Closed
Bug 26067
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
pref-colors.dtd: positioning is l10n incompatible
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Preferences, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: kairo, Unassigned)
Details
(Whiteboard: [2012 Fall Equinox])
Doing l10n work (M13 de-AT), I encountered the following problems with chrome/pref/.../pref-colors.dtd: Try those values from my German Language Pack: <!ENTITY useWinColorsCheck.label "Windows-Farben verwenden"> <!ENTITY underLinksCheck.label "Links unterstreichen"> <!ENTITY links "Links"> <!ENTITY unvisit "Nicht besuchte Links:"> <!ENTITY visit "Besuchte Links:"> Looks awful. OTOH, the same options are in chrome/pref/.../pref-composer.dtd are are l10n compatible and better-looking there. Shouldn't panles showing the same kind of options be similar? Would also solve this problem if you take the Composer Panel's version...
Updated•24 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
Mozilla.org localizer points out that the browser's color prefrences and composer's color preferences should look more alike. Currently the UI of each is very different to the other. He uses the German example, but it's equally true for English. He suggests that pref-composer.dtd is the better-designed of the two. Assigning to matt as he seems to be the owner of the preferences dialogs (unless it's brade or rgoodger/ben?) Changing component to PrefUI.
Assignee: fergus → matt
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Component: Localization → Pref UI
We can change the UI. The UI was duplicated from the UI of 4.0.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: M15
Bulk move of all Pref UI component bugs to new Preferences component. Pref UI component will be deleted.
Component: Pref UI → Preferences
M18 ...
Assignee: matt → mcafee
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Target Milestone: M16 → M18
Updated•23 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.0
Comment 11•23 years ago
|
||
I dont really understand this bug. Is this still a problem? Why can't the German l10n team just set whatever colors they want? Please reply, otherwise we shd mark this bug as wfm now.
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
i think the question amounts to why the composer and navigator color pref panels are so different when they expose the same number of choices.
Comment 13•23 years ago
|
||
Concerning browser dialog layout: it looks like navigator's could be improved by putting the "Link colors" group box under the "Text and Background" to accomodate longer German words. Concerning differences with Composer: We needed more features in our primary color picker than the simple Navigator version, so we also used that picker in our preference panel for consistency within Composer. I will be working on making Composer color picker more like a menupopup (bug 90670), so we should try to unify navigator and composer versions in the process. There's already a bug on that as well: bug 39784.
![]() |
Reporter | |
Comment 14•23 years ago
|
||
vishy: This was originally reported about M13, and the L12y situation got much better until now (who wonders?) as pref dialog generally got wider, and dialog width is now localizeable. But, as timeless states, the dialog layout differences between the Navigator and Composer color pref settings are hard to understand, and make pref panels inconsistent. IMO, the composer panel, which also has a preview area, is much easier to understand for users. cmanske: I think the color picker problem is an additional problem to the dialog layout problem here (the layout can be made more consitent though it may still use the current colorpicker) - though it's also important to get addressed. I know that both layouts are somehow inherited from 4.x but I still think we can get better in consistency than 4.x was.
Comment 15•23 years ago
|
||
mass change, switching qa contact from jonrubin to ruixu.
QA Contact: jonrubin → ruixu
Comment 17•22 years ago
|
||
Reassigning to a real person.
Assignee: vishy → ben
QA Contact: ruixu → sairuh
Updated•19 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Updated•17 years ago
|
Assignee: bugs → prefs
QA Contact: bugzilla
Comment 18•16 years ago
|
||
(Filter "spam" on 'prefs-nobody-20080612'.)
Assignee: prefs → nobody
QA Contact: prefs
Updated•16 years ago
|
Priority: P3 → --
Target Milestone: Future → ---
Comment 19•11 years ago
|
||
Is this problem still actual?
Whiteboard: [2012 Fall Equinox][CLOSEME 2012-11-01 INVA/WONT?]
Comment 20•11 years ago
|
||
Resolved per whiteboard
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
Whiteboard: [2012 Fall Equinox][CLOSEME 2012-11-01 INVA/WONT?] → [2012 Fall Equinox]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•