Closed
Bug 264868
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Use .login and .email correctly when 'emailsuffix' is used
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Creating/Changing Bugs, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 2.18
People
(Reporter: andreas.beckmann, Assigned: Wurblzap)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
2.97 KB,
patch
|
goobix
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
3.10 KB,
patch
|
goobix
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040917 Firefox/0.9.3
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040917 Firefox/0.9.3
I'm running an installation of bugzilla which uses the 'emailsuffix' parameter
to add '@doma.in' to the logins.
After a recent bugzilla upgrade (2.18rc1/CVS (?) to 2.18rc2/CVS) Bugzilla
started to reassign bugs on commenting and complained about failed matches.
This happens because the 'Reassign To' field contains the complete email
address, not just the login part.
RFE: if matching fails, try stripping 'emailsuffix' from the failed login.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #162460 -
Attachment description: use 'bug.assigned_to.login' instead of 'bug.assigned_to.login' in template/en/default/bug/knob.html.tmpl → use 'bug.assigned_to.login' instead of 'bug.assigned_to.email' in template/en/default/bug/knob.html.tmpl
Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Version: unspecified → 2.18
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
This is a regression of bug 255913.
Flags: blocking2.20?
Flags: blocking2.18?
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 162460 [details] [diff] [review]
use 'bug.assigned_to.login' instead of 'bug.assigned_to.email' in template/en/default/bug/knob.html.tmpl
> use 'bug.assigned_to.login' instead of 'bug.assigned_to.login' in
This should be: Use .login rather than .email
Looks sensible.
r=burnus
Attachment #162460 -
Flags: review+
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Flags: approval?
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Bug 255913 went into 2.18, too.
Flags: blocking2.20?
Flags: blocking2.18?
Flags: approval2.18?
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: approval?
Flags: approval2.18?
Flags: approval2.18+
Flags: approval+
Keywords: regression
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: myk → andreas.beckmann
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Previous patch, plus two more places.
I obviously missed this class of e-mail occurrences in bug 255913. Now Andreas'
bug made me aware of it, I re-checked with it in mind. I identified two similar
places I should have fixed in bug 255913.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #162563 -
Flags: review?
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
clearing approvals until we get new reviews
Flags: approval2.18+
Flags: approval+
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #162564 -
Flags: review?
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
These look correct but I am currently unable to test, please request testing
from someone more active.
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: blocking2.20?
Flags: blocking2.18?
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
This bug blocks bug 157567. A quick review would be fine! :)
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 162563 [details] [diff] [review]
Fixing other places, too [head patch]
vladd, kiko told me you were the right person to ask. :)
Attachment #162563 -
Flags: review? → review?(vladd)
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #162460 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: blocking2.18? → blocking2.18+
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: blocking2.18+ → blocking2.18?
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: andreas.beckmann → wurblzap
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
the branch patch fixed the issue for me on 2.18rc3.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: blocking2.20?
Flags: blocking2.20+
Flags: blocking2.18?
Flags: blocking2.18+
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 162563 [details] [diff] [review]
Fixing other places, too [head patch]
r=vladd assuming someone tested this.
Attachment #162563 -
Flags: review?(vladd) → review+
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 162564 [details] [diff] [review]
Fixing other places, too [branch patch]
r=vladd assuming someone tested this.
Attachment #162564 -
Flags: review? → review+
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: approval2.18+
Flags: approval+
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
Checking in template/en/default/bug/edit.html.tmpl;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/bug/edit.html.tmpl,v <--
edit.html.tmpl
new revision: 1.45; previous revision: 1.44
done
Checking in template/en/default/bug/knob.html.tmpl;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/bug/knob.html.tmpl,v <--
knob.html.tmpl
new revision: 1.8; previous revision: 1.7
done
Checking in template/en/default/global/confirm-user-match.html.tmpl;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/global/confirm-user-match.html.tmpl,v
<-- confirm-user-match.html.tmpl
new revision: 1.8; previous revision: 1.7
done
Checking in template/en/default/bug/edit.html.tmpl;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/bug/edit.html.tmpl,v <--
edit.html.tmpl
new revision: 1.40.2.3; previous revision: 1.40.2.2
done
Checking in template/en/default/bug/knob.html.tmpl;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/bug/knob.html.tmpl,v <--
knob.html.tmpl
new revision: 1.6.2.1; previous revision: 1.6
done
Checking in template/en/default/global/confirm-user-match.html.tmpl;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/global/confirm-user-match.html.tmpl,v
<-- confirm-user-match.html.tmpl
new revision: 1.7.2.1; previous revision: 1.7
done
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Summary: show_bug.cgi should honour 'emailsuffix' in 'Reassign bug to' field → Use .login and .email correctly when 'emailsuffix' is used
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 276839 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 278473 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Updated•12 years ago
|
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•