Closed
Bug 272835
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Unable to enter two different email accounts on Thunderbird using the same ISP account name.
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Account Manager, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: info, Assigned: mscott)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Build Identifier: version 0.9 (20041103) On MS Outlook we had several email addressess that all referenced the same ISP mailbox. (i.e., info@xxxx.org volunteer@xxxx.org officemanager@xxxx.org) We are a small non-profit and did this to save the cost of purchasing seperate mailboxes from our ISP. Obviously each Outlook account would have the same ISP login information. The end result is that all incoming mail was dumped in to the same inbox but we were able to select the appropriate address for outgoing mail for "branding" our communications. Thunderbird will not allow similar configuration. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Add email account with first name using ISP account and password 2. Set up secong email account with same ISP account and password. 3. Error will appear before you can complete second set-up Actual Results: The error message reads: "A mail or newsgroup account with the same user name and server name already exists. Click Back and enter a differenct server name, or click Cancel." Expected Results: The software should have allowed the second account to use the same user name and server name.
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
See Thunderbird FAQ. http://kb.mozillazine.org/index.phtml?title=Thunderbird_:_FAQs_:_Multiple_Identities
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
DUP of Bug 44863 > Bug 44863 UI for multiple identities per account *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 44863 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
As I understand, it has been decided that this bug is the duplicate of another resolved bug. That bug was resolved through the implementation of an enhancement that allows multiple identities to exist on a single email account. Whilst I agree that this addresses the user requirements the reporter had (which multiple identities could address), I dispute that it solves all the problems associated with the Actual Result section: The error message reads: "A mail or newsgroup account with the same user name and server name already exists. Click Back and enter a differenct server name, or click Cancel." As I understand, Account Wizard and Manager attempt to prevent the creation of duplicate accounts by design (indeed, I have viewed the source (looking for a workaround) in AccountWizard.js and AccountManager.js at the repository path mozilla/mailnews/base/prefs/resources/content). An account is considered to be a duplicate of a pre-existing account if it has the same server type and name, and user name settings. When creating a new account in Account Wizard, the detection of this condition pop's-up an alert that informs: A mail or newsgroup account with the same user name and server name already exists. Click Back and enter a different server name, or click Cancel. When modifying an existing account in Account Maanger, the detection of this condition pop's up an alert that informs: An account with that user name and server name already exists. Please enter a different user name and/or server name. Presumably, the denial of duplicate account creation feature (let's call it that for the moment) is a safeguard against simulatenous download and deletion of messages over POP3. I cannot think of another reason, although suspect that there might be one. A rationale for the feature would be very helpful. However, the feature also denies creation of accounts that aren't exactly duplicates, and that I believe have valid justification for existing. My home ISP account provides me an SMTP service, that is only accessible from the ISP network(a common practise to limit spamming). Externally, I cannot send mail via the ISP SMTP server. Similarly, my workplace has a SMTP server that is also only accessible from my workplace network. So, for convinience, I would seek to have two accounts, that are configured something like this: My ISP Server Type: IMAP Server Host: imap.MyISP.com User Name: me Smtp Host: smtp.MyISP.com My ISP (from workplace) Server Type: IMAP Server Host: imap.MyISP.com User Name: me Smtp Host: smtp.MyWorkplace.com I could then reasonable use the compose mail drop down to select which account to send with, switching between the two accounts when at home or at work. In fact, I can achieve this anyway, because the duplicate detection code is not case sensitive, and I can change the case on the Server Host. And in fact, in a broader sense, I could use an alias to the server host to avoid the duplication. There would be little that the Thunderbird code could do to detect that the alias points to the same server host. So, whilst it is a nicety for the detection code to be there, I question the rationale behind denying the creation or update of a duplicate account. Surely, since it can be by-passed, and there is no sure fire way of detecting all duplicate cases, it could play nice and just issue a warning instead?
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) After re-reviewing the Manage Identities feature that is claimed to resolve this bug, I must apologise. It is an adequate solution for the duplicate account scenario I describe. What I am able to do instead of creating a duplicate account is to have an account for my workplace and my ISP, and then create a secondary identity on my workplace acocunt, for my ISP identity. In this way, I can use the workplace email delivery to send my private mail. It is also a neater solution to the one I put forward. However, I still stand-by my view that denial of the creation of such duplicate accounts is a step too far, because the detection of the duplicates is by-passible. A warning should be sufficient. I can come up with a patch if it helps (I will try it anyway at some future stage).
Updated•18 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•