crash, fixed22.214.171.124, testcase, verified126.96.36.199
3.58 KB, text/plain
8.67 KB, text/plain
25.59 KB, text/html
3.61 KB, patch
|Details | Diff | Splinter Review|
1.34 KB, patch
|Details | Diff | Splinter Review|
2.86 KB, patch
|Details | Diff | Splinter Review|
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050122 Camino/0.8+ Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050122 Camino/0.8+ Pop-up window has nested body tags. Inner tag has an onLoad handler set to parent.close(). When this fires, a double free is reported followed by a segfault. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Visit URL shown above. 2. Click link to popup window. 3. When it loads, browser crashes. Actual Results: Double free log followed immediately by segfault. Expected Results: Just close the pop-up window. Here's the log message from the console: *** malloc: error for object 0x606a4d0: Double free Segmentation fault Camino nightly from 2005-01-19 was not affected. Camino nightly from 2005-01-20 crashes. 2005-01-21 Firefox Mac nightly also crashes (from http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2005-01-21-07-trunk/firefox-1.0+.en-US.mac.dmg.gz ) Note, removing the nested body tags (so that there's just a single body tag with parent.close()), seems to avoid bug. This is a test case that I derived from a crash in the login dialog that is part of the popular PHP-based photo gallery software distributed at gallery.menalto.com. I don't know what component this would be, but someone else grabbed a stack trace and indicated this crashed in the gecko code, so setting product to core.
Set component to DOM: Events due to onLoad. (Not sure this is right.)
Component: Disability Access APIs → DOM: Events
I also get a crash on Linux. Talkback ID is TB3249472W and my version is Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050120 Firefox/1.0+. Clicking just once didn't cause the crash; I had to do it several times.
Assignee: aaronleventhal → events
QA Contact: accessibility-apis → ian
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Keywords: crash, testcase
OS: MacOS X → All
Hardware: Macintosh → All
Summary: Crash in pop-up window on parent.close() due to double free. → Crash in pop-up window on parent.close() due to double free. [@ nsCSSFrameConstructor::RestyleEvent::HandleEvent]
Hmm... I can't seem to reproduce this. Are people seeing this in builds in which bug 279205 is fixed?
Boris, I can crash a debug build with bug 279205 fixed. I have to click the link quite fast, before the previous popup have disappeared.
Oh, ok. If I click the link at least 3 times in a row before the first window comes up, I see the crash. Dan, the frame constructor is getting events that it explicitly revoked... They're being dispatched when ~nsEventQueueStack in nsXULWindow::CreateNewContentWindow pops the thread event queue. If I click _more_ than three times, I actually end up with multiple nested calls to nsXULWindow::CreateNewContentWindow on the stack. dmose suggested that maybe there is a locking issue in revokeEvents. Note also that David recently ran into a similar problem (see http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/view/src/nsViewManager.cpp#361). I don't see anything obviously wrong in revokeEvents or the NSPR code it calls, but I don't quite follow the intricacies of all that code...
Despite my clicking madness (4 clicks before first window comes up), am unable to reproduce on Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050328.
I can't reproduce the crash either (in a debug build). But I do see: WARNING: event queue chain length is 6. this is almost certainly a leak., file nsEventQueue.cpp, line 549 so we should keep this bug open for further analysis, see comment 7.
Severity: critical → normal
Yeah, I can't reproduce the crash either, anymore... I'd file a separate bug on the event queue length issue (that's caused by new window.open calls before the previous window has finished opening). Note also bug 284389, though... That could still cause crashes here in some circumstances, I bet.
should we close this out now. bug 284389 is fixed, test url no longer available...
don't know that this is the same problem, or that it's more than a fluke (as I've never had FF crash like this clicking a link) TB16957942 Stack Signature nsCSSFrameConstructor::RestyleEvent::HandleEvent 7d740223 Product ID Firefox15 Build ID 2005111116 Trigger Time 2006-03-28 08:42:01.0 Platform Win32 Operating System Windows NT 5.0 build 2195 Module firefox.exe + (00186106) URL visited http://www.dft.nl User Comments right click followed by copy URL location (in Bug 39573) s/vseerror Since Last Crash 2795954 sec Total Uptime 8198774 sec Trigger Reason Access violation Source File, Line No. c:/builds/tinderbox/Fx-Mozilla1.8/WINNT_5.2_Depend/mozilla/layout/base/nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp, line 13907 Stack Trace nsCSSFrameConstructor::RestyleEvent::HandleEvent [c:/builds/tinderbox/Fx-Mozilla1.8/WINNT_5.2_Depend/mozilla/layout/base/nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp, line 13907] SETUPAPI.DLL + 0x30c24 (0x778b0c24)
I exactly get this crash with the latest Thunderbird 188.8.131.52 nightly build and the extension "Minimize To Tray" installed. Yesterday I hadn't any problem with this fresh combination but today it always crashes while trying to read a specific message with attachment. Is it the same like this bug or should I file a new bug? The stack only consists of 3 frames... Stack Signature nsCSSFrameConstructor::RestyleEvent::HandleEvent c30de5df Product ID Thunderbird2 Build ID 2008011503 Trigger Time 2008-01-16 06:43:28.0 Platform Win32 Operating System Windows NT 5.1 build 2600 Module thunderbird.exe + (0022acc2) URL visited User Comments Edit recipient while forwarding a message crashes Thunderbird Since Last Crash 53 sec Total Uptime 53 sec Trigger Reason Access violation Source File, Line No. e:/builds/tinderbox/Tb-Mozilla1.8/WINNT_5.0_Depend/mozilla/layout/base/nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp, line 14256 Stack Trace nsCSSFrameConstructor::RestyleEvent::HandleEvent [mozilla/layout/base/nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp, line 14256] HandleRestyleEvent [mozilla/layout/base/nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp, line 14281] 0x778b0c24 nsScriptLoader::ProcessRequest [mozilla/content/base/src/nsScriptLoader.cpp, line 694] 0x8a084689
I'm also getting this (it looks like) very frequently with both latest branch of Thunderbird and Firefox. For Firefox, it happens whenever I have a wysiwyg editor on a page and close that tab, then open another tab with another wysiwyg editor. For Thunderbird, happens when shutting down the program (no where near as annoying, assuming my data is safe.) TB40260872K TB40286768K TB40286699E TB40262025W Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:184.108.40.206pre) Gecko/20080116 BonEcho/220.127.116.11pre Thunderbird version 18.104.22.168pre (20080115) -[Unknown]
Do you know the build ID of the build before that didn't crash so we have an exact regression range? If you don't know, maybe you can try a few builds from http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/ (folders ending in "-mozilla1.8/"), that would help a lot. Thanks.
Guessing a tentative regression range 2008011403 -- 2008011503: http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=all&branch=MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH&branchtype=match&dir=&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=explicit&mindate=2008-01-14+02%3A00&maxdate=2008-01-15+04%3A00&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot Boris, bug 396613 seems the most likely culprit in that range. This should block 22.214.171.124 until we can explain the sudden regressions.
Severity: normal → critical
(In reply to comment #16) > Guessing a tentative regression range 2008011403 -- 2008011503: > http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=all&branch=MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH&branchtype=match&dir=&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=explicit&mindate=2008-01-14+02%3A00&maxdate=2008-01-15+04%3A00&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot > > Boris, bug 396613 seems the most likely culprit in that range. > > This should block 126.96.36.199 until we can explain the sudden regressions. > I use Thunderbird on a daily basis (and update nightlies on a daily basis), as do I deal with content management systems which use midas/etc. nearly every day. I can confirm that that is the regression range - at least for my problem. -[Unknown]
Sure. That bug could cause more restyle events. The basic problem remains what I said in comment 7, as far as I could tell at the time...
Created attachment 297469 [details] stacks Editor calls ReconstructStyleData() on a shell that has been Destroy()'ed.
Yeah, I was going to ask. That does seem like the right thing to do. Does trunk need that too?
This bug is really nasty for my Thunderbird 2 branch build. It crashes or doesn't correctly respond to any events afterwards I've sent a special message. I could click e.g. on Tools - Error Console and nothing happens for a while. After a minute or so the window is shown. Same applies to any context menu or other windows.
(In reply to comment #23) > After a minute or so the window is shown. Same applies to any context menu or That wasn't correct. The Error Console window and each other one is shown after I close the main window. Seems that the events hanging around and aren't processed until the target is closed.
(In reply to comment #21) > Does trunk need that too? It was already fixed on trunk in bug 315453. However, I still found one trunk crash that looks suspicious: bp-3877f0ba-c2d9-11dc-8592-001a4bd43ef6 PostRestyleEvent() is called in just a few more places: http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/search?string=PostRestyleEvent mostly from ContentStatesChanged/AttributeChanged methods, but those are called from several hundred places... nsCSSFrameConstructor has 'mIsDestroyingFrameTree' that basically signals that the shell is destroyed, I think it might be worth adding an early return in PostRestyleEvent() if it's true - at least on branch where we have less mileage on doing async restyle events.
Assignee: events → mats.palmgren
Doing an early return in PostRestyleEvent if 'mIsDestroyingFrameTree' makes total sense. Let's do that!
Created attachment 297724 [details] [diff] [review] Branch patch, rev. 1
Created attachment 297725 [details] [diff] [review] Trunk patch, rev. 1 I added the assertion because I think it's worth investigating should it occur. Mochitest and reftest suites on Linux didn't trigger it.
MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH: mozilla/layout/base/nsPresShell.cpp 3.852.2.30 mozilla/layout/base/nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp 1.1110.6.93 Trunk: mozilla/layout/base/nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp 1.1455 FWIW, I tried to make a testcase from the description in comment 0 but without success. (URL is 404 and I didn't have a local copy :-( ) -> FIXED
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9 M11
This was checked in on branch without approval. Trunk and branch rules are different. "blocking" might be good enough on trunk which is in a beta development period but the branch is essentially in final release-candidate lockdown all the time. Explicit approval is always required.
Comment on attachment 297724 [details] [diff] [review] Branch patch, rev. 1 Oops, sorry.
Attachment #297724 - Flags: approval188.8.131.52?
I get a 403 permission error when I try to go to http://aoeu.mine.nu/~zan/crash.html to verify this fix. I need a test case or working url to verify this fix in branch for the release.
(In reply to comment #32) > I need a test case or working url to verify this fix in branch for the release. You can verify this with Thunderbird branch. See bug 412701 for steps. Marcia, Tomcat, or stephend can also verify it.
Comment on attachment 297724 [details] [diff] [review] Branch patch, rev. 1 approved for 184.108.40.206, a=dveditz for release-drivers
Attachment #297724 - Flags: approval220.127.116.11? → approval18.104.22.168+
I could reproduce this 100% with earlier Thunderbird branch builds, but can longer, with: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:22.214.171.124pre) Gecko/2008012804 Thunderbird/126.96.36.199pre. Also, from the duped bug 412693 (which has a separate testcase), the reporter there reports that the update fixed it for him, too. Verified FIXED, so replacing fixed188.8.131.52 keyword with verified184.108.40.206.
Keywords: fixed220.127.116.11 → verified18.104.22.168
Comment on attachment 297724 [details] [diff] [review] Branch patch, rev. 1 a=asac for 22.214.171.124
Attachment #297724 - Flags: approval126.96.36.199+
Any chance to get a testcase for this bug? The given URL isn't available anymore. I would like to verify this on trunk.
MOZILLA_1_8_0_BRANCH: Checking in layout/base/nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/layout/base/nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp,v <-- nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp new revision: 1.1188.8.131.52.69; previous revision: 1.1184.108.40.206.68 done Checking in layout/base/nsPresShell.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/layout/base/nsPresShell.cpp,v <-- nsPresShell.cpp new revision: 3.8220.127.116.11.14; previous revision: 3.818.104.22.168.13 done
Crash Signature: [@ nsCSSFrameConstructor::RestyleEvent::HandleEvent]
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.