Closed
Bug 279908
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
XUL canvas doesn't build with cairo 0.3.0
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: Canvas2D, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: levertond, Unassigned)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
|
895 bytes,
patch
|
roc
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050126 MultiZilla/1.7.0.0f
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050126 MultiZilla/1.7.0.0f
Cairo 0.3.0 (required for Mozilla SVG with Cairo since the checkin in
http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=SeaMonkeyAll&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=mozilla%2Flayout%2Fsvg%2Frenderer%2Fsrc%2Fcairo&file=&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=72&date=explicit&mindate=2005-01-24+09-00-00&maxdate=2005-01-24+10-00-00&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot,
and will be required for every use of Cairo in Mozilla when bug 279785 is fixed)
places its header files in a subdirectory called "cairo", requiring the app to
add that directory to its include path. Mozilla's configure script detects the
directory properly, but it doesn't get added to the include path when building
the XUL canvas tag.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install Cairo 0.3.0.
2. Attempt to configure and build Mozilla with --enable-cairo
Actual Results:
The compiler can't find cairo.h when building nsCanvasRenderingContext2D.cpp
Expected Results:
Shiny new Mozilla build.
Patch coming....
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
OK, that last one didn't work so well, apologies. Let's try again....
Attachment #172455 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 280100 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Vlad, Pav, would one of you be the right reviwer for this?
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Resolved by bug 289994 ?
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 172456 [details] [diff] [review]
2nd attempt
Vlad, is this the right change here?
Attachment #172456 -
Flags: superreview?(roc)
Attachment #172456 -
Flags: review?(vladimir)
Comment on attachment 172456 [details] [diff] [review]
2nd attempt
Probably, but I've rewritten all the canvas stuffs in bug 288714, which is just
waiting for some reviews to get checked in.
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
Well, note that it's been two months since you were first asked about the
changes in this bug.... Good to finally have a response, though. :(
Hmm, oops :( Redid my bug mail setup a month or two ago to try to make sure I
didn't miss important stuff, sorry 'bout that!
When this gets fixed, you should back out the change in bug 289994.
Attachment #172456 -
Flags: superreview?(roc) → superreview+
Updated•20 years ago
|
Component: Layout: Misc Code → Layout: Canvas
QA Contact: layout.misc-code → layout.canvas
Obsoleted by HTML Canvas
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Attachment #172456 -
Flags: review?(vladimir)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•