Closed
Bug 29693
Opened 26 years ago
Closed 26 years ago
Asa and Lisa need (new) glasses
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: MailNews: Message Display, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: alan-lists, Assigned: BenB)
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
|
49.17 KB,
image/jpeg
|
Details |
In text messages sent/received _underline_ is not converted.
If I remember the html right it would be conveted to something like this.
<em class=txt_underline>underline</em>
Also it is not clear |code| is converted correctly
<code class=txt_verticalline>code</code>
In the origianl bug i saw comments saying that |code| was not implemented or
commented out then later it looked like it was implemented.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
QA Contact: lchiang → asj
Summary: TEXT -> HTML Conversion of _underline_ → TEXT -> HTML Conversion of _underline_
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•26 years ago
|
||
worksforme. Do you have the corresponding prefs in Mailnews/Messages enabled?
Code should work just like any other struct now.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•26 years ago
|
||
*bold* works along with (c) ect..
it is just _underline_ shows just the _ underline _ (no space)
I am not the only one seeing this. lchiang@netscape.com is seeing this also.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•26 years ago
|
||
I view the bugzilla mail of the previous comment in my debug build from some hs
ago and everything works fine.
Maybe try other fonts for x-unicode or tomorrow's build. Or it's a pp (platform
parity) issue?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•26 years ago
|
||
Interesting... very confusing.
Lisa, you were also seeing this can you comment?
I am on Win95, ben what platform are you on?
I am on WinNT. On the same email I sent out, I can see italics, but not
underline. Ben, I'll send an email to you and see what you get. What is your
primary platform?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•26 years ago
|
||
My platform is Linux and your mail displays fine.
Lisa, "underline" in the screenshot you attached *is* italic...
| Reporter | ||
Comment 11•26 years ago
|
||
Ben, that is sorta what we are seeing. For some reason on my computer I was not
seeing quite as Italics at first. Lisa saw the Italics before I did.
Comment 12•26 years ago
|
||
ben - it shouldn't be italic, right?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•26 years ago
|
||
Lisa, it is expected to be displayed italic, because "<em
class=txt_underline>underline</em>" is inserted, which is usually displayed
italic (em = emphasis). I included examples for that as well in my description
<http://www.bucksch.org/1/projects/mozilla/16507>. See also bug #24703.
I think, you're kidding me here, right? If yes, it worked :-). Changing SUMMARY
from "TEXT -> HTML Conversion of _underline_" to "Asa and Lisa need (new)
glasses" and marking WONTFIX. Adding this bug to me Mozilla fun collection
<http://www.bucksch.org/1/projects/mozilla>.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 26 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Summary: TEXT -> HTML Conversion of _underline_ → Asa and Lisa need (new) glasses
| Assignee | ||
Comment 14•26 years ago
|
||
BTW: Change in the prefs your x-unicode fonts to something better, if you want
the italics to be better/more visible (I had my problems with Courier italics,
too). You can also enable variable width fonts for plain text msgs, which gives
you much nicer fonts.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 15•26 years ago
|
||
> On the same email I sent out, I can see italics, but not underline
OK, I missed this sentence, sorry. Anyway, this bug was a good laugh :-).
Comment 16•26 years ago
|
||
Bug 24703 is basically what we're saying here. The bug report didn't stick in
my mind for some reason when I read it before. I'll mark this won't fix then.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•21 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Comment 17•12 years ago
|
||
lol
| Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #5923 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•