Closed Bug 29693 Opened 26 years ago Closed 26 years ago

Asa and Lisa need (new) glasses

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: MailNews: Message Display, defect, P3)

x86
Windows 95
defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: alan-lists, Assigned: BenB)

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

49.17 KB, image/jpeg
Details
In text messages sent/received _underline_ is not converted. If I remember the html right it would be conveted to something like this. <em class=txt_underline>underline</em> Also it is not clear |code| is converted correctly <code class=txt_verticalline>code</code> In the origianl bug i saw comments saying that |code| was not implemented or commented out then later it looked like it was implemented.
QA Contact: lchiang → asj
Summary: TEXT -> HTML Conversion of _underline_ → TEXT -> HTML Conversion of _underline_
worksforme. Do you have the corresponding prefs in Mailnews/Messages enabled? Code should work just like any other struct now.
*bold* works along with (c) ect.. it is just _underline_ shows just the _ underline _ (no space) I am not the only one seeing this. lchiang@netscape.com is seeing this also.
I view the bugzilla mail of the previous comment in my debug build from some hs ago and everything works fine. Maybe try other fonts for x-unicode or tomorrow's build. Or it's a pp (platform parity) issue?
Interesting... very confusing. Lisa, you were also seeing this can you comment? I am on Win95, ben what platform are you on?
I am on WinNT. On the same email I sent out, I can see italics, but not underline. Ben, I'll send an email to you and see what you get. What is your primary platform?
I'm attaching a screenshot of what I see.
Attached file screenshot (obsolete) —
darn - attachment did not work.
Attached image .jpg file
My platform is Linux and your mail displays fine. Lisa, "underline" in the screenshot you attached *is* italic...
Ben, that is sorta what we are seeing. For some reason on my computer I was not seeing quite as Italics at first. Lisa saw the Italics before I did.
ben - it shouldn't be italic, right?
Lisa, it is expected to be displayed italic, because "<em class=txt_underline>underline</em>" is inserted, which is usually displayed italic (em = emphasis). I included examples for that as well in my description <http://www.bucksch.org/1/projects/mozilla/16507>. See also bug #24703. I think, you're kidding me here, right? If yes, it worked :-). Changing SUMMARY from "TEXT -> HTML Conversion of _underline_" to "Asa and Lisa need (new) glasses" and marking WONTFIX. Adding this bug to me Mozilla fun collection <http://www.bucksch.org/1/projects/mozilla>.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 26 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Summary: TEXT -> HTML Conversion of _underline_ → Asa and Lisa need (new) glasses
BTW: Change in the prefs your x-unicode fonts to something better, if you want the italics to be better/more visible (I had my problems with Courier italics, too). You can also enable variable width fonts for plain text msgs, which gives you much nicer fonts.
> On the same email I sent out, I can see italics, but not underline OK, I missed this sentence, sorry. Anyway, this bug was a good laugh :-).
Bug 24703 is basically what we're saying here. The bug report didn't stick in my mind for some reason when I read it before. I'll mark this won't fix then.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Depends on: 1036022
lol
Attachment #5923 - Attachment is obsolete: true
No longer depends on: 1036022
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: