305293 - Bfcache-related crash when going back [@nsNavigator::SetDocShell]

Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 305166

(Camino Graveyard :: History, defect)

Description

[Wevah (Nate Weaver)]

Go to the above URL, and click the "wet_journey" link, then go back. Witness crash.

This doesn't occur in the latest DP nightly.

Comment 1

[Wevah (Nate Weaver)]

Attachment: Crash log.

Comment 2

[Smokey Ardisson (offline for a while; not following bugs - do not email)]

WFM Camino 2005081904 (v0.9a2+) branch.

Comment 3

[Wevah (Nate Weaver)]

Yeah, but this is on the trunk (thanks for testing the branch, though). It also
doesn't happen in the August 18th trunk build, so it regressed within the last
day or so.

Comment 4

[Wevah (Nate Weaver)]

(In reply to comment #3)
> Yeah, but this is on the trunk (thanks for testing the branch, though).

Er, should be "Yeah, this is on the trunk[...] so I don't sound annoyed. ;)

Comment 5

[OstGote!]

Hmm I crashed with Seamonkey 1.9a1 trunk build 2005081906 on WinXP with the IMO
same crash stack, see Talkback TB8548989W. Seems to be Core and All/All and not
only Camino/Mac.

Comment 6

[Wevah (Nate Weaver)]

(In reply to comment #5)
> Hmm I crashed with Seamonkey 1.9a1 trunk build 2005081906 on WinXP with the IMO
> same crash stack, see Talkback TB8548989W. Seems to be Core and All/All and not
> only Camino/Mac.

The stack seems slightly different; I'd do some further investigating but I need
to not edit bugs on a lack of sleep. If it's determined that it's the same (as
it may very well be), go ahead and change it.

Was it my example that caused the crash for you? I guess if that's the case then
it's almost certainly this bug and so it should be edited.

Comment 7

[Radek 'sysKin' Czyz]

If examples are needed:
Using Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20050819
Firefox/1.6a1

Go to http://www.ausitalianclub.com.au/
Do This Frame -> Show Only This Frame
Go Back.

Actual results: TB8548498Y, TB8548497E

Comment 8

[Torben]

Probably bug 305166, which were fixed through bug 304896 yesterday (not sure if
it made it into the nightlies yet).

Comment 9

[Wevah (Nate Weaver)]

Looks like it; the stack is virtually identical.

I'll check it with today's nightly to be sure.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 305166 ***

Comment 10

[Wevah (Nate Weaver)]

Dupe for sure; it's fine in today's nightly.