Closed
Bug 30659
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
No scrollbars when information not visible
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Preferences, enhancement, P3)
SeaMonkey
Preferences
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: u12624, Assigned: matt)
References
Details
(Keywords: helpwanted, Whiteboard: relnote-user)
Attachments
(1 file)
15.68 KB,
image/gif
|
Details |
M14 does not have any scrollbars, horizontal or vertical, when the preferences window is too small to show all the information on the right panel.
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
Confirmed in 2000050208, Linux i686. Poor low-resolution users.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Updated•24 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → M20
Poor low-resolution users?!? I've got a big screen, and the preferences window looks great, but it turns out there's more data on the preference window than is shown, and not a single clue that the data is there.
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
this would be a useful feature to have. right now, the user needs to resize the prefs dialog to see all the info in it. (at least it's resizable on mac, win32 and linux.)
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
Scrollbars for dialog chrome? Noooooooo! We'd get laughed out of town. Making the user resize, or scroll, anything in order to see controls is not acceptable. Dialogs should only be resizable in extremely rare cases -- and the prefs dialog is not one of these cases. The only respectable way to fix this problem is to ensure that the prefs window is large enough to show all the controls in any panel. Given that UI fonts may, on Windows and Linux at least, be of any size, there are two ways to do this. The first is to do a trial layout of every panel when the dialog is first opened, in order to calculate the overall minimum size needed. Given the number of panels in the prefs dialog currently (and the time each of them take to lay out by themselves), that would probably take a very long time indeed. The second possibility is to allow the prefs dialog as a whole to resize itself as the user switches panels (like some of Apple's tabbed dialogs do). This would be much faster, but would make the interface look rather unstable. relnoteRTM this: `In some panels of the Preferences dialog, there may be more options available than are visible in the dialog. To see all the options, resize the dialog.'
Keywords: relnoteRTM
Whiteboard: relnote-user
I think that it would be useful to allow the Preferences dialog to be resized, but I absolutely agree with mpt that the dialog box should be designed so that resizing is NOT required. (And scrollbars attached to dialog boxes are definitely WRONG.)
Comment 8•24 years ago
|
||
The behaviour of this bug has changed somewhat; now to get scrollbars in the preferences dialog, you must expand the tree, close it, and expand it again - at which time the scrollbars appear. Annoying at best.
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
Comments to previously uploaded GIF: I'm using build 2001030715 under Mac OS 9.1. Resizeable window is a nice idea but not implemented like this - buttons are truncated even when prefs window is very large already (Navigator > History). They are even off screen when reducing its size! Also, when I try to change the default search engine (Navigator > Internet search) by accessing the popupmenu (also truncated BTW), scrolling goes beserk if you move the mouse above the top of the popupmenu. It keeps on scrolling! Using standard mouse on stardard Apple extended keyboard.
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
am thinking of resolving this as wfm or even invalid at this point because: the prefs dialog is now resizeable for all platforms [not ideal, but...], and there are already bugs for cases when (1) the content doesn't fit or wrap properly [eg, bug 70296], and (2) when resizing doesn't work to display the content [eg, bug 67120].
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
mass verification of WorksForMe bugs: to find all bugspam pertaining to this, set your search string to "IfItWorksForSlappyTheSquirrelThenItWFM". if you think this particular bug is *still* an open issue, please make sure of the following before reopening: a. that it's still a problem with ***recent trunk builds*** on the all appropriate platform[s] b. provide clear steps to reproduce (unless a good test case is already in the bug report), making sure it pertains to the original problem (avoid morphing as much as possible :)
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•