User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 Firefox/1.0.7 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 Firefox/1.0.7 Hello, I am trying to use the Acrobat 7 "Upload for browser-based review option..." wizard for PDF reviews of drafts by multiple reviewers - don't ask why! :-) I used a shared UNC path that all out sites acn see, this all works well, sent a test to myself from the wizard (i.e., it "hijacks" the Thunderbird 1.5 beta 2 mail client), and I get a nice email back with an FDF attachment - doubleclicking opens the review draft on the shared UNC path, etc, etc as expected. THE ISSUE: reviewers using Outlook who I send invitations to review too get a DAT attachment insteasd, which is unopenable (no, not a WINMAIL.DAT, more a A34567.DAT style attachment...) ASIDE: Firefox (erronooulsy) wants to get involved as well when I 'submit for review;, trying to open / save the PDF in disk Help! TIA! Greg... Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1) open a PDF in Acrobat 7.0, 'Sed for Review', 'Upload For Browser Based Review', proceed through Wizard (using a shared UNC) 2)annoyingly (aside), default browser Firefox tries to open PDF, need to open 3)add email address of desired reviewer in address box, and 'send invitation' 4) Thunderbird - OK to "Another application is attempting to send email..." 5a) Reviewers using a Thunderbird email client get an email with an (openable)FDF attachment 5B) *** Reviwers using an Outlook email client get an email with an (unopenable) DAT attachment *** Actual Results: see above Expected Results: Reviewers using Outlook as their email client should get an email with a (useable) FDF attachment - *not* a DAT attachment.. cheers!
see Bug 309566 I think your problem also is triggered by long filenames, or "special characters" in it...
Greg Cocks, I believe comment 1 is correct -- this is likely a duplicate of that other bug; if so, the problem would be seen for filenames containing non-ASCII characters (accented, umlauted, or non-Roman alphabets). If you agree this is the issue, please mark this bug as a duplicate of that bug.
I forgot to mention: there's a workaround for this problem cited at that bug.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 309566 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.