Closed Bug 315391 Opened 19 years ago Closed 19 years ago

CSS content bug

Categories

(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect)

1.0 Branch
x86
Windows XP
defect
Not set
minor

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 215083

People

(Reporter: margus.sipria, Assigned: dbaron)

Details

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fi; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051025 Firefox/1.5
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fi; rv:1.8) Gecko/20051025 Firefox/1.5

#profemail a {content: 'secret@email.com'}

won't overwite a tag, but if i use :after or :before it will...

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
<a href="mailto:secret@email.com" style="content: 'secret@email.com'">secret@email....</a>
Actual Results:  
secret@email....

Expected Results:  
secret@email.com

a {
 font-size: 0pt !important;
 font-size: 9pt;
}

a:after {
 content: "secret@email.com";
 font-size: 9pt;
}

css that i where using to work around woun't work in opera... and it is bad work around.
True, the content property correctly only applies inside a :before/:after
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-content/#inserting3

Applies To: all elements, ::before, ::after, ::alternate, ::marker, ::line-marker, margin areas, and @footnote areas


Does it always have to **** the dot? I creat web pages and i support Firefox, is so bad to do this?
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: INVALID → ---
Assignee: nobody → dbaron
Component: General → Style System (CSS)
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: general → ian
Version: unspecified → 1.0 Branch
In CSS2, 'content' only applies to :before and :after.  You seem to be requesting that we implement the CSS3 version, where it applies to all elements, so marking duplicate.  Please don't add comments to the duplicate bug unless they help in fixing that bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 215803 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago19 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Er, typo in bug number
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 215083 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago19 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.