property("conformance-level") should return "full"

RESOLVED WONTFIX

Status

Core Graveyard
XForms
RESOLVED WONTFIX
11 years ago
10 months ago

People

(Reporter: Allan Beaufour, Unassigned)

Tracking

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

(URL)

Attachments

(1 attachment)

1.04 KB, application/xhtml+xml
Details
(Reporter)

Description

11 years ago
We return "basic", which sort of degrades Doron's schema work :)
(Reporter)

Comment 1

11 years ago
Created attachment 218678 [details]
Testcase

Comment 2

11 years ago
Perhaps the complex type schema stuff should be conditionally built and support both basic and full, say: -DXFORMS=10_BASIC ...or something.  Is there plans to support both profiles?  Would be nice to only build basic support for Minimo.

Comment 3

11 years ago
Maybe this is something that you can bring up with the XForms WG to see what they would recommend as a minimum for 'full' being returned here.  We don't support the full schema spec, so I'd be hesitant to change us to 'full' unless other implementors thought that we were close enough.

Comment 4

11 years ago
(In reply to comment #2)
> Perhaps the complex type schema stuff should be conditionally built and support
> both basic and full, say: -DXFORMS=10_BASIC ...or something.  Is there plans to
> support both profiles?  Would be nice to only build basic support for Minimo.
> 

We could look into it.  I don't think that the code bloat is that bad between the two (as of now, at least), so it would be more or less a performance decision.  Maybe open an 'enhancement' bug (or lower priority bug) on us to consider this?  Might be a post 1.0 thing to do, too.
(Reporter)

Comment 5

11 years ago
(In reply to comment #3)
> Maybe this is something that you can bring up with the XForms WG to see what
> they would recommend as a minimum for 'full' being returned here.

Feel free to mail www-forms :)

> We don't support the full schema spec, so I'd be hesitant to change us to
> 'full' unless other implementors thought that we were close enough.

It's not terribly important to me what we return right now, but we are aiming for a "full" implementation, so imho that's what we should return. We support much more schema stuff than Basic anyways.

Comment 6

11 years ago
(In reply to comment #4)
> Maybe open an 'enhancement' bug (or lower priority bug) on us to
> consider this?  Might be a post 1.0 thing to do, too.

See enhancement bug 335728
(Reporter)

Updated

11 years ago
Assignee: aaronr → xforms
RIP xforms
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: a year ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.