Closed Bug 334333 Opened 15 years ago Closed 5 years ago

property("conformance-level") should return "full"

Categories

(Core Graveyard :: XForms, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: allan, Unassigned)

References

()

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

1.04 KB, application/xhtml+xml
Details
We return "basic", which sort of degrades Doron's schema work :)
Attached file Testcase
Perhaps the complex type schema stuff should be conditionally built and support both basic and full, say: -DXFORMS=10_BASIC ...or something.  Is there plans to support both profiles?  Would be nice to only build basic support for Minimo.
Maybe this is something that you can bring up with the XForms WG to see what they would recommend as a minimum for 'full' being returned here.  We don't support the full schema spec, so I'd be hesitant to change us to 'full' unless other implementors thought that we were close enough.
(In reply to comment #2)
> Perhaps the complex type schema stuff should be conditionally built and support
> both basic and full, say: -DXFORMS=10_BASIC ...or something.  Is there plans to
> support both profiles?  Would be nice to only build basic support for Minimo.
> 

We could look into it.  I don't think that the code bloat is that bad between the two (as of now, at least), so it would be more or less a performance decision.  Maybe open an 'enhancement' bug (or lower priority bug) on us to consider this?  Might be a post 1.0 thing to do, too.
(In reply to comment #3)
> Maybe this is something that you can bring up with the XForms WG to see what
> they would recommend as a minimum for 'full' being returned here.

Feel free to mail www-forms :)

> We don't support the full schema spec, so I'd be hesitant to change us to
> 'full' unless other implementors thought that we were close enough.

It's not terribly important to me what we return right now, but we are aiming for a "full" implementation, so imho that's what we should return. We support much more schema stuff than Basic anyways.
(In reply to comment #4)
> Maybe open an 'enhancement' bug (or lower priority bug) on us to
> consider this?  Might be a post 1.0 thing to do, too.

See enhancement bug 335728
Assignee: aaronr → xforms
RIP xforms
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.