Remove nsHTMLImageMapAccessible, no longer needed

RESOLVED FIXED

Status

()

Core
Disability Access APIs
RESOLVED FIXED
11 years ago
11 years ago

People

(Reporter: Aaron Leventhal, Assigned: Aaron Leventhal)

Tracking

({access})

Trunk
x86
Linux
access
Points:
---
Dependency tree / graph

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

(URL)

Attachments

(1 attachment)

(Assignee)

Description

11 years ago
An image map with 2 areas should be exposed something like this:

{parent AtkImage, AtkHypertext, text="***", AtkHyperlink, role=ATK_ROLE_IMAGE,
   attr="html:tag=map", ImageBounds=[entire map area] 
   AccName and ImageDescription="Site map"}
    {child AtkHyperlink, AtkAction, 
     action-names="click", role=ATK_ROLE_LINK, 
     attr="html:tag=area", hyperlink-URI="1.html", name="Bar"}
    {child AtkHyperlink, AtkAction, 
     action-names="click", role=ATK_ROLE_LINK,
     attr="html:tag=area", hyperlink-URI="2.html", name="Baz"}
(Assignee)

Comment 1

11 years ago
Test case: http://www.mozilla.org/access/qa/map_area.html
(Assignee)

Updated

11 years ago
No longer blocks: 333492
Depends on: 333492
(Assignee)

Updated

11 years ago
Blocks: 333492
No longer depends on: 333492
Summary: Treat image map areas as children of the image, similar to MSAA approach → New ATK: Treat image map areas as children of the image, similar to MSAA approach
(In reply to comment #1)
> Test case: http://www.mozilla.org/access/qa/map_area.html
> 

the link is corruptted
(Assignee)

Comment 3

11 years ago
Sorry it's really here: http://www.mozilla.org/access/qa/tiny/map_area.html
(Assignee)

Comment 4

11 years ago
I have a fix for this in bug 340829.
Depends on: 340829
(Assignee)

Comment 5

11 years ago
Created attachment 226499 [details] [diff] [review]
This already worked but we needed to remove files
Attachment #226499 - Flags: review?(ginn.chen)
(Assignee)

Updated

11 years ago
Summary: New ATK: Treat image map areas as children of the image, similar to MSAA approach → Remove nsHTMLImageMapAccessible, no longer needed
(Assignee)

Updated

11 years ago
Attachment #226499 - Flags: review?(ginn.chen) → review?(pilgrim)
Comment on attachment 226499 [details] [diff] [review]
This already worked but we needed to remove files

r=me
Attachment #226499 - Flags: review?(pilgrim) → review+
(Assignee)

Updated

11 years ago
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.