Closed
Bug 341369
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Label/Tag colors are not working
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Mail Window Front End, defect)
Thunderbird
Mail Window Front End
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: mstockman, Assigned: Bienvenu)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(1 file)
26.01 KB,
patch
|
moco
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060612 Minefield/3.0a1
Build Identifier: version 3 alpha 1 (20060612)
Mail that I have already marked with different labels (Important, for example) is no longer showing any color in any mail views.
This happened at the same time that Label disappeared from the Message menu and was replaced by Tag, so perhaps it's related.
(Incidentally, why tag instead of label? Seems like a random change that doesn't add anything.)
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Select a message
2. Right-click and choose a label from the Tag submenu.
3. Notice that the color doesn't change.
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
Tags are like labels, just more of them than five. ;-) See bug 114656.
The current CSS is still based on the label properties, which doesn't work yet for keywords/tags. (Fixing this might need backend changes, so probably moving to Core:MailNews backend?)
This bug is visible in SeaMonkey trunk builds also.
Severity: normal → critical
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: General → Mail Window Front End
Depends on: 114656
Ever confirmed: true
Keywords: regression
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: PC → All
Version: unspecified → Trunk
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
Changes/fixes here should also update the shortcut keys (0-5) which still work and do labels stuff, and the label preference panel!
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
Mike Stockman, is your problem that mails labelled with a previous version aren't displaying with the expected colors, or that it's no longer possible to label a message? If the former: When you show the Label column in the 3-pane, do you also not see the old label appear in the column for messages you know
were labelled?
With TB 3a1-0613, Win2K, I see previously labelled messages in the expected colors. xref bug 114656 comment 122.
Severity: critical → major
Summary: Label colors are not working → Label/Tag colors are not working
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
When I display the Labels column, I can see the following:
1) Any message that I labeled "Important" before installing the recent nightly is still labeled Important
2) Anything that I *tag* as Important with current nightlies is also labeled Important
Neither of those messages displays the color that was all-too-recently assigned to the label "Important," and is currently assigned to the tag "Important," which is red.
Is there some set of older files I should delete/recreate in my profile that might be stepping on the color display?
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
convert the view backend code to use tag colors, not label colors - but we do migrate the label colors to the corresponding tags, so the user shouldn't be able to tell any difference. I ripped out almost all the label stuff in nsMsgDBView.cpp but I left the pref change observer since I'm not sure if we'll need that going forward...
Assignee: mscott → bienvenu
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #225947 -
Flags: superreview?(sspitzer)
Comment 6•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 225947 [details] [diff] [review]
proposed fix
sr=sspitzer, acting mailnews superreviewer for mailnews while mscott is away.
one question: for "rv = aHdr->GetLabel(&label);" should you check the rv?
the exiting nsMsgTagService::GetColorForKey() , zoinks!
Attachment #225947 -
Flags: superreview?(sspitzer) → superreview+
Assignee | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•19 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 341879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8•19 years ago
|
||
David, (or some QA)
I'm running 2006-06-22-04-trunk for Linux.
This is still broken. Please re-open.
Comment 9•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #8)
> I'm running 2006-06-22-04-trunk for Linux.
> This is still broken. Please re-open.
It's working fine for me with 3a1-0629, Win2K -- if you're still seeing a
problem under Linux, that's a different bug; please open a new one.
Reporter | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•