Closed
Bug 350753
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
mail account manager tree subbranch order broken
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: MailNews: Account Configuration, defect)
SeaMonkey
MailNews: Account Configuration
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: mnyromyr, Assigned: neil)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
|
1.02 KB,
patch
|
mnyromyr
:
review+
mscott
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Up to SM 2006-07-12-09 (Windows), subbranches of an account entry in the mail account manager were sorted like this:
Server Settings
Copies & Folders
Composition & Addressing
Disk Space
Junk Settings
Return Receipts
Security
Since SM 2006-07-13-09 (Windows), the (dis)order is:
Disk Space
Copies & Folders
Composition & Addressing
Server Settings
Junk Settings
Return Receipts
Security
The IMO most likely check-in causing this in the regression window seems to be for bug 335122:
<http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=all&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=&file=&filetype=regexp&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=explicit&mindate=2006-07-12+00%3A00%3A00&maxdate=2006-07-13+10%3A00%3A00&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot>.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
It looks like Enn changed all trees to use sort instead of sortResource (but the good news is that we don't have to manually sort the tree any more).
Assignee: mail → neil
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #236207 -
Flags: superreview?(mscott)
Attachment #236207 -
Flags: review?(mnyromyr)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #236207 -
Flags: review?(enndeakin)
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 236207 [details] [diff] [review]
Proposed patch
OK, but it should still work with sortResource though, does it not?
Attachment #236207 -
Flags: review?(enndeakin) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
>but it should still work with sortResource though, does it not?
Err.. no, it does not, otherwise this bug wouldn't have been filed etc?
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
I meant, does it work with sortResource without the manual sorting? If not, then there's still an compatibility issue with the sort service.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
OK, so as Enn says, it's only the manual sorting that's confusing it.
Attachment #236207 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #236212 -
Flags: superreview?(mscott)
Attachment #236212 -
Flags: review?(mnyromyr)
Attachment #236207 -
Flags: superreview?(mscott)
Attachment #236207 -
Flags: review?(mnyromyr)
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #236212 -
Flags: superreview?(mscott) → superreview+
| Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #236212 -
Flags: review?(mnyromyr) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Fix checked in.
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 350945 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•