Closed Bug 350753 Opened 20 years ago Closed 20 years ago

mail account manager tree subbranch order broken

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: MailNews: Account Configuration, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: mnyromyr, Assigned: neil)

References

Details

(Keywords: regression)

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

Up to SM 2006-07-12-09 (Windows), subbranches of an account entry in the mail account manager were sorted like this: Server Settings Copies & Folders Composition & Addressing Disk Space Junk Settings Return Receipts Security Since SM 2006-07-13-09 (Windows), the (dis)order is: Disk Space Copies & Folders Composition & Addressing Server Settings Junk Settings Return Receipts Security The IMO most likely check-in causing this in the regression window seems to be for bug 335122: <http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=all&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=&file=&filetype=regexp&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=explicit&mindate=2006-07-12+00%3A00%3A00&maxdate=2006-07-13+10%3A00%3A00&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot>.
Attached patch Proposed patch (obsolete) — — Splinter Review
It looks like Enn changed all trees to use sort instead of sortResource (but the good news is that we don't have to manually sort the tree any more).
Assignee: mail → neil
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #236207 - Flags: superreview?(mscott)
Attachment #236207 - Flags: review?(mnyromyr)
Attachment #236207 - Flags: review?(enndeakin)
Comment on attachment 236207 [details] [diff] [review] Proposed patch OK, but it should still work with sortResource though, does it not?
Attachment #236207 - Flags: review?(enndeakin) → review+
(In reply to comment #2) >but it should still work with sortResource though, does it not? Err.. no, it does not, otherwise this bug wouldn't have been filed etc?
I meant, does it work with sortResource without the manual sorting? If not, then there's still an compatibility issue with the sort service.
OK, so as Enn says, it's only the manual sorting that's confusing it.
Attachment #236207 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #236212 - Flags: superreview?(mscott)
Attachment #236212 - Flags: review?(mnyromyr)
Attachment #236207 - Flags: superreview?(mscott)
Attachment #236207 - Flags: review?(mnyromyr)
Attachment #236212 - Flags: superreview?(mscott) → superreview+
Attachment #236212 - Flags: review?(mnyromyr) → review+
Fix checked in.
Blocks: 335122
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
*** Bug 350945 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: