Closed
Bug 353252
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Some Unicode glyphs displayed incorrectly in Lucida Grande and other fonts.
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Text and Fonts, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: jesse, Unassigned)
References
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7
Using Lucida Grande on MacOS X, some Unicode glyphs display incorrectly. In particular, 0x21E6-0x21E9 appear as logical symbols rather than the arrows that they should be.
MacOS X defines 0x21E7 as the glyph for representing the shift key. Firefox incorrectly renders 0x0005 as this arrow. This behavior is inconsistent with both the MacOS X system Character Palette and the behavior in Safari.
I was able to get the correct character glyphs using monospace instead of Lucida Grande though many other fonts behave like Lucida Grande.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
<div style="font-family: 'Lucida Grande';">
0x0005:  (<span style="font-family:monospace;"></span>)<br/>
0x21E6: ⇦ (<span style="font-family:monospace;">⇦</span>)<br/>
0x21E7: ⇧ (<span style="font-family:monospace;">⇧</span>)<br/>
0x21E8: ⇨ (<span style="font-family:monospace;">⇨</span>)<br/>
0x21E9: ⇩ (<span style="font-family:monospace;">⇩</span>)<br/>
</div>
Actual Results:
Lucida Grande glyphs are incorrect and don't match the monospace glyphs.
Expected Results:
Glyphs should render as blank/empty, left arrow, up arrow, right arrow, down arrow and match the monospace glyphs.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
And unfortunately  is reported as an invalid character in an XHTML page so there is no work around in this case.
Updated•19 years ago
|
Component: General → Layout: Fonts and Text
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: general → layout.fonts-and-text
Version: unspecified → 1.8 Branch
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
This is fixed in 3a7
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
marking wfm based on comment #2
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•