Closed
Bug 358870
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
attachments included with replies
Categories
(Thunderbird :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 161775
People
(Reporter: robin, Assigned: mscott)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7
When replying to a message which contains an attachment the attachment is included with the reply message and ther seems no way of preventing this. I am used to turnpike and outlook which hold a reference but do not keep sending the attachemnt back and forth
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open email with attachemnt
2.Reply
3.The replt will contain the attachemnt
A reference to the file attachemnt should be included as text but the attachment should not be resent as part of the reply
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 161775 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
presumably, these are text or html attachments...I recently checked in a change on the trunk so that we won't quote text attachments at all - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358124
Not sure what happens with html attachments. I don't leave a reference at all since that doesn't seem so useful...
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
> presumably, these are text or html attachments...I recently checked in a
> change on the trunk so that we won't quote text attachments at all [...]
>
> Not sure what happens with html attachments.
The problem occurs with all attachments that display inline, including images (if you're doing an HTML reply), .eml files, and HTML. I've done some testing; it appears that only the text/plain case is covered. Unfortunately, my testing is hindered by bug 358938; but I've got at least one message with a text/html attachment that doesn't get included on reply, I don't know what the difference is.
> I don't leave a reference at all since that doesn't seem so useful...
I don't understand this comment. What kind of reference?
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
By reference, I was referring to the original comment in this bug - I assume it's something like the title/name of the attachment that was stripped...
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•