Closed Bug 359632 Opened 18 years ago Closed 18 years ago

Font Preferences + Large Fonts: size dropdowns too small

Categories

(Thunderbird :: Preferences, defect)

x86
Windows 2000
defect
Not set
trivial

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Thunderbird2.0

People

(Reporter: mcow, Assigned: mscott)

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

TB 2b1-1026

I'm not 100% sure about the Large Fonts issue, since I haven't switched back to a small fonts configuration to test (because switching is a big pain).

I think we just need a pixel or two more of width, altho the Min Font Size should be wide enough for the word "None" and I think there's more than two pixels needed for that.  Screenshot follows.
Attached image screenshot
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird2.0
I'm seeing a similar size issue on several other pages:
 * Display | Formatting: the Style dropdown isn't wide enough to display "Bold Italic" without an ellipsis; and the Size dropdown isn't wide enough for either "Regular" or "Smaller".
 * Composition | General: 'Forward message' isn't wide enough to show "As Attachment" without an ellipsis.
 * Composition | Spelling: 'Language' isn't wide enough for "English/United States".

I noticed that Firefox 2.0's Font setting -- both the simple one on the Content tab and the Advanced box -- have the same issue as TB with the Size dropdowns.
One more: Composition | HTML Options:  Size is too narrow for "medium" and 
"xx-large".
Mike, what's the difference between the two screen shots? they both use large fonts, but the one is at a different resolution which makes it fit?

I'm running large fonts at 1024x768 and everything fits FWIW.
(In reply to comment #5)
> Mike, what's the difference between the two screen shots? they both use large
> fonts, but the one is at a different resolution which makes it fit?
> 
> I'm running large fonts at 1024x768 and everything fits FWIW.

I don't know the difference.  I'm running on Windows 2000.  My fonts under TB are Palatino Linotype for serif, Trebuchet MS for sans-serif -- could that be a cause?

Bug 234774 is about a very similar problem, and Doug Wright reports seeing it with normal fonts on his XP setup.
Fixed by the patch to bug 359632.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Scott says that patch didn't change anything.  Re-resolving to WFM; I'll reopen if this problem re-emerges.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago18 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: