Closed
Bug 362478
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
Thunderbird (WINNT 5.2 tb-win32-tbox Depend) compiled with winver 0x400
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Build Config, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: smaug, Assigned: Gijs)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
|
785 bytes,
patch
|
rhelmer
:
review+
mscott
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
According to logs -DWINVER=0x400 -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x400 are used.
Is there any reason for this?
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
I think these build flags can be removed now that the trunk Thunderbird build machine is using VS8.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
This was one of the reasons my checkin for bug 366337 broke. I would really appreciate it if this could be fixed, as it will cause problems for that checkin otherwise. :-)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
Per:
[23:58:15] <sayrer> looks like it makes for -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x400
[23:58:38] <sayrer> but you need _WIN32_WINNT=0x0500
Assignee: mscott → gijskruitbosch+bugs
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #251971 -
Flags: review?(rhelmer)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 251971 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch
<rhelmer> Hannibal: can you r? mscott as well?
Attachment #251971 -
Flags: review?(mscott)
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 251971 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch
can't we just remove this winver string altogether? Do we list it in the firefox trunk win32 build?
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5)
> (From update of attachment 251971 [details] [diff] [review])
> can't we just remove this winver string altogether? Do we list it in the
> firefox trunk win32 build?
This patch is for trunk; we do not list this on the 1.8 or 1.8.0 branches though.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•18 years ago
|
||
Fx trunk doesn't have it either. So then perhaps this is better.
Attachment #251971 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #251978 -
Flags: superreview?(mscott)
Attachment #251978 -
Flags: review?(rhelmer)
Attachment #251971 -
Flags: review?(rhelmer)
Attachment #251971 -
Flags: review?(mscott)
Comment 8•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 251978 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch: Remove line entirely
Rob's review is the one that really matters though :)
Attachment #251978 -
Flags: superreview?(mscott) → superreview+
Updated•18 years ago
|
Attachment #251978 -
Flags: review?(rhelmer) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•18 years ago
|
||
Cool! Rob, can I check this in myself (at some time when there are build people around) and will that automagically update the tinderbox? Or are things more complicated than that?
Comment 10•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #9)
> Cool! Rob, can I check this in myself (at some time when there are build people
> around) and will that automagically update the tinderbox? Or are things more
> complicated than that?
Go ahead and check in, it will be automatically pulled by tinderbox.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 11•18 years ago
|
||
Checking in mozilla/tools/tinderbox-configs/thunderbird/win32/mozconfig;
/cvsroot/mozilla/tools/tinderbox-configs/thunderbird/win32/mozconfig,v <-- mozconfig
new revision: 1.4; previous revision: 1.3
done
The build has since cycled succesfully with the new mozconfig.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•