Closed
Bug 364195
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
No way to search for private comments
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Query/Bug List, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 3.0
People
(Reporter: reed, Assigned: reed)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
1.97 KB,
patch
|
justdave
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
There's an "Attachment is private" option, but there's no "Comment is private" option, meaning there's no way to search for private comments. :(
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
This works for me on prodpatches, but I'm not sure if I added it to everything I was supposed to.
Assignee: query-and-buglist → reed
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #248968 -
Flags: review?(justdave)
Assignee | ||
Updated•18 years ago
|
Flags: blocking3.0?
Updated•18 years ago
|
Attachment #248968 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #248968 -
Flags: review?(justdave)
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
This one actually has checks to make sure only the people that can see the comments can search for them. :P
I don't like this logic, but I don't know of any other way to do it.
Attachment #249009 -
Flags: review?(justdave)
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 249009 [details] [diff] [review]
patch - v2
Logic looks sound, but I don't like using "isprivate" as the field name, as from the context it's being used it, that makes it look like we're searching for whether the bug is private or not.
longdesc and commenter are the only other things in that table we can search right now, but those are obvious from the context. I believe we have comment types now (to distinguish duplicate and attachment added and so forth) and that might be worth searching on eventually, so doing a group with longdescs.foo might not be so bad.
So let's make this one longdescs.isprivate
Attachment #249009 -
Flags: review?(justdave) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
s/isprivate/longdescs.isprivate/... is that all I needed to do?
Attachment #249009 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #249082 -
Flags: review?(justdave)
Updated•18 years ago
|
Attachment #249082 -
Flags: review?(justdave) → review+
Updated•18 years ago
|
Attachment #249082 -
Flags: review+ → review?(justdave)
Updated•18 years ago
|
Attachment #249082 -
Flags: review?(justdave) → review+
Updated•18 years ago
|
Flags: blocking3.0? → blocking3.0+
Updated•18 years ago
|
Flags: approval+
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
Checking in Bugzilla/Field.pm;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Field.pm,v <-- Field.pm
new revision: 1.24; previous revision: 1.23
done
Checking in Bugzilla/Search.pm;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Search.pm,v <-- Search.pm
new revision: 1.143; previous revision: 1.142
done
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 7•18 years ago
|
||
The correct bug number for those release notes is actually bug 349423.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•