Closed
Bug 371779
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Reevaluate required fields for user profiles
Categories
(addons.mozilla.org Graveyard :: Administration, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
4.0.3
People
(Reporter: clouserw, Assigned: wenzel)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
2.88 KB,
patch
|
clouserw
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
I've had people ask me on IRC to remove the "Last name must not be empty" requirement (and I agree it should go). We used to require nicknames - maybe we could bring that back and remove lastname, or..? Our current requirements are: 'email' => VALID_EMAIL, 'password' => VALID_NOT_EMPTY, 'firstname' => VALID_NOT_EMPTY, 'lastname' => VALID_NOT_EMPTY, 'homepage' => VALID_URL_OPT
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
I do not use nicknames and I think I am not alone with it. Would it be possible to require at least one of firstname/lastname/nickname to be filled in?
Why do we even have more than one name field? Maybe "Nickname" and "Real name" (real name being optional and used for stuff like official communication or sending tshirts...)
Component: Add-ons → Administration
QA Contact: add-ons → administration
Target Milestone: --- → 3.x (triaged)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
We'll change this requirement to Nickname OR First+Last.
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → fwenzel
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
This patch enforces our new "required fields" policy (that is, first and last OR nick) on a model level, and add a little explanation to the register and edit views as well.
Attachment #345234 -
Flags: review?(clouserw)
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
The patch works fine, but why are we requiring both first name and last name? Why can't it just be first or last or nickname?
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #6) > The patch works fine, but why are we requiring both first name and last name? Hm, dunno, wasn't that what we decided on? I guess it makes sense though. We just don't want the entire thing to be empty. I'll make a new patch.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
On the other hand: We require the nickname to be unique, but not the other fields. So if someone's nickname was "clouserw", everybody else could fill that into the firstname box and imitate him. What do you say?
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #8) > On the other hand: We require the nickname to be unique, but not the other > fields. So if someone's nickname was "clouserw", everybody else could fill that > into the firstname box and imitate him. What do you say? I don't think that's a problem we're going to solve here. Whether someone makes their name ". clouserw" or "c1ouserw" (that's a one right thar) there are just too many combinations of similar looking names.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
This patch just enforces one of the three fields not to be empty.
Attachment #345234 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #345298 -
Flags: review?(clouserw)
Attachment #345234 -
Flags: review?(clouserw)
Reporter | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #345298 -
Flags: review?(clouserw) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
Thanks: Committed to r19440, l10n in r19441.
Verified FIXED on https://preview.addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/users/register
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Reporter | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: push-needed
Updated•8 years ago
|
Product: addons.mozilla.org → addons.mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•