Closed Bug 387403 Opened 17 years ago Closed 17 years ago

Thunderbird eat memory until crash when opening e-mail with broken vcard

Categories

(Thunderbird :: Mail Window Front End, defect)

x86
All
defect
Not set
critical

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: tometzky, Assigned: Bienvenu)

Details

(Keywords: verified1.8.0.13, verified1.8.1.5, Whiteboard: [sg:low dos])

Attachments

(3 files, 1 obsolete file)

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070603 Fedora/2.0.0.4-2.fc7 Firefox/2.0.0.4 Build Identifier: 2.0.0.4 (20070604) When opening e-mail with broken vcard that looks like this: ========================================================================== begin:vcard fn;quoted-printable:Xxxx=C5=82xx Xxx n;quoted-printable:Xxx;Xxxx=C5=82xx adr;quoted-printable;quoted-printable;dom:;;xx. Xxxxxxxxxxxx X;Lubacz=C3=3 ========================================================================== Thunderbird eats all available memory. This is an actual vcard received from another Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 user (personal details changed to X-es). I don't know how this user has managed to create a vcard that broken (a city name ends with a half of a letter "ó" (oacute), it should be "Lubaczów"), but it seems it is somehow possible. Thunderbird should not crash on an e-mail anyway - does not matter how terribly broken one. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open the message I'll attach. Actual Results: Thunderbird eats all available memory, slows a computer to a crawl and then crashes. Expected Results: Message is displayed, possibly with an information that attached vcard is broken. I've tested Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 on Windows and Linux and Seamonkey 1.1.2 on Windows - all affected. I think this could be used as some kind of DOS.
yeah, this is a simple DOS - marking security sensitive for now, though the work around is not to click on the message. The bug looks to be in mailnews/addrbook/src/nsvcard.cpp
Group: security
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Attached patch possible fixSplinter Review
this fixes the infinite allocating loop. We won't display any of the v-card because basically the v-card parser seems to ignore the whole thing in case of errors. I'm not sure if this is going to break a v-card where we have an empty field at the end, but I don't think that would be valid anyway, since the vcard should end with "end:vcard".
Assignee: nobody → bienvenu
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #271530 - Flags: superreview?(mscott)
Attachment #271530 - Flags: superreview?(mscott) → superreview+
fixed on trunk - requesting 1.8.1.5 approval, after some bake time on the trunk.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Attachment #271530 - Flags: approval1.8.1.5?
Does this affect Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 as well?
good question, yes, from looking at the code, I think it does (i.e., it's not a regression)
Comment on attachment 271530 [details] [diff] [review] possible fix approved for 1.8.1.5 and 1.8.0.13, a=dveditz for release-drivers. Please land within ~30 hours or it'll have to go next time.
Attachment #271530 - Flags: approval1.8.1.5?
Attachment #271530 - Flags: approval1.8.1.5+
Attachment #271530 - Flags: approval1.8.0.13+
fix landed on 1.8.1.5 branch
Keywords: fixed1.8.1.5
verified fixed 1.8.1.5 using the test email message from comment #1 with Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.5pre) Gecko/20070711 Thunderbird/2.0.0.5pre ID:2007071104 on Fedora F7 and Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.8.1.5pre) Gecko/20070710 Thunderbird/2.0.0.5pre Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 ID:2007071100 - Thunderbird don`t crash or eat all memory. Thunderbird stays here with 44 MB Memory Usage. -> adding verified keyword
Whiteboard: [sg:low dos]
This still needs landing on the 1.8.0 branch for an eventual Thunderbird 1.5.0.13
Flags: wanted1.8.1.x+
Flags: wanted1.8.0.x+
Flags: blocking1.8.1.5+
Flags: blocking1.8.0.13+
Checked in to 1.8.0 branch
Keywords: fixed1.8.0.13
verified fixed Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; zh-CN; rv:1.8.0.13) Gecko/20070809 Thunderbird/1.5.0.13 ID:2007080918 Thunderbird does not crash and also not eat all memory
Group: security
Flags: in-testsuite?
This FIXED bug is flagged with in‑testsuite? It would be great if assignee or someone else can clear the flag if a test is not appropriate. And if appropriate, create a test and plus the flag to finish off the bug.
Attached patch Testcase (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Testcase for this bug. With the "possible fix" patch backed out, this test hangs and eats memory. Note that I've downgraded an assertion in nsAbManager to a warning - if the vcard parsing failed, then it is potentially not us (a lot of vcards come from outside). I didn't want to change the return result as looking at the callers they don't handle an error situation, so just picking up a blank card is best (and I doubt we'd have got this far anyway because we'd be attempting to parse a vcard displayed on a message).
Attachment #367848 - Flags: superreview?(bienvenu)
Attachment #367848 - Flags: review?(bienvenu)
Sorry, here's the correct version.
Attachment #367848 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #367858 - Flags: superreview?(bienvenu)
Attachment #367858 - Flags: review?(bienvenu)
Attachment #367848 - Flags: superreview?(bienvenu)
Attachment #367848 - Flags: review?(bienvenu)
Attachment #367858 - Flags: superreview?(bienvenu)
Attachment #367858 - Flags: superreview+
Attachment #367858 - Flags: review?(bienvenu)
Attachment #367858 - Flags: review+
Comment on attachment 367858 [details] [diff] [review] [checked in] Testcase v2 Checked in testcase: http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/5cb4e78cb271
Attachment #367858 - Attachment description: Testcase v2 → [checked in] Testcase v2
Flags: in-testsuite? → in-testsuite+

Hi,

Thanks to a better checking and reporting in the lower-level code, I see the following error message in xpcshell test log of FULL DEBUG version of C-C TB when I used "--verbose" && "--serialize" (to avoid the mixing of logs from different tests executed by different processes)
coming from this test for about a month or so now.:

 3:43.05 pid:319990 JavaScript error: /NEW-SSD/moz-obj-dir/objdir-tb3/_tests/xpcshell/comm/mailnews/addrbook/test/unit/test_bug387403.js, line 12: uncaught exception: ParserError: Missing parameter value in 'fn;quoted-printable:Xxxx=C5=82xx  Xxx'

For long-term maintenance purposes., it would be insanely great to have the test to print out something like the following on start up:
"This test produces 'ParserError: Missing parameter value.'
This is intentional and can safely be ignored."

Maybe we can add
dump(""This test produces 'ParserError: Missing parameter value.'
This is intentional and can safely be ignored.")
to
comm/mailnews/addrbook/test/unit/test_bug387403.js.

But come to think of it, the lower-level code no longer tries to catch and do something sensible about the ParseError(???).

You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: