Allow edit of unsent message (Outbox folder messages should open to a compose window when double click)
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Composition, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: esther, Unassigned)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
855 bytes,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Using build 2000-05-25, if user double clicks on a message in unsent folder it should open up to a compose window (similiar to draft) like in 4.7x.
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
re-assign to putterman, cc ducarroz, rhp. one of them got this to work for drafts / templates. not a nsbeta2 bug.
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
I'm going to suggest we can live without this and move to future milestone.
Add mail3 keyword. If we are going to work on offline, this is important.
Comment 10•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 88717 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11•23 years ago
|
||
1. The behavior is incosistent compared with 4.x Messenger 2. The behavior is also inconsistent compared with MS products such as Outlook. Not sure why we decided to change this behavior. The inconsistency, from a user perspective, looked like a bug which is why I reported it. BTW, the 'Edit as New Msg' on unsent mail is also inconsistent with 4.x. I also reported this one too as a bug. So, if this is not considered a bug, that would be acceptable. But I think it would be important to be consistent with 2 most widely used mail products, 4.x Messenger and MS Outlook.
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
I had been looking this bug, but for some reason I didn't find it. I had almost decided to report it, but now I see more persons think like me. For me, this is an annoying bug and I think there is no need to worry about consistency with other mail clients. I think double click should always allow to edit an unsent message, because many times happens that we read our message before delivery and often we want to change something. "Edit As New" feature is not very useful also because if we edit the message and we send it immediately, a copy of the sent message is saved, and a copy of the old message remains also on "Unsent Messages". I really can't figure out why this behavior has not been changed already! I will vote for the bug.
Comment 13•23 years ago
|
||
I agree 100% with comment #12 from knocte. We need to be able to edit the original message. The main reason I want to see this feature is that I make extensive use of address lists and if I Forward a message using a list and the original sender is also in the list then they get a copy as well. Some people get rather stressed about this, especially if the mail has a large attachment and they have a slow connection, so I have to Send Later, Edit As New to remove the sender.
Comment 14•22 years ago
|
||
when will the mail app can have this enhanced function. It is an important part. Hope to modify it soon.
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
adding self to cc list
Comment 17•22 years ago
|
||
Double Clicking on Messages in UnsentMessagess folder will open compose window with that message.
Comment 18•22 years ago
|
||
This Patch seems to be not complete. It works like "Edit As New". When I click "send later" again it should overwrite the old message and not as a new message. I think the Bug description not complete.
Comment 19•22 years ago
|
||
You are right and I have asked varada to resolve that already.
Comment 20•22 years ago
|
||
Shouldn't a doubleclick consistently do the same thing in *all* folders - namely just preview the mail in a new window? I think it would be more consistent and correct to add an *EDIT MSG* button in the header bar of messages in the "Unsent Messages" folder, similar to how messages are treated in the "Drafts" folder. (BTW. I wished there were an *EDIT* button in the "Templates" folder's messages too.) This would, in addition to being consistent, have the added benefit of providing the user a *visual clue* that he _can_ edit the unsent message. If the user edits such a message and presses either "Save", or "Send Later", then the previous copy should be overwritten (OK, save normally creates a copy in the "Drafts" folder - what to do?). Perhaps "Save" could do both - copy in Drafts- and Unsent folders. Then when sent, delete from both Drafts and Unsent folders. If the user presses "Send" then the original copy of the msg should be deleted from the Unsent folder. I know my suggestions would technically make this bug a WONTFIX, but perhaps we could just agree to rename the summary and move forward.
Comment 21•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 158268 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22•22 years ago
|
||
Why would you ever want to look at a message in a new window? I can't think of a reason that reading your message in a new window would offer anything that you didn't get reading it in the original window. It has already been noted that NN users and OE users are already trained to use this functionality. Why break it unless there is something to be gained in doing so?
Comment 23•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 165764 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Updated•20 years ago
|
Comment 25•18 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 254738 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26•18 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 362059 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 27•18 years ago
|
||
If you want to compare with other mail clients, Eudora opens unsent message as editable. Thunderbirds behavior is quite annoying if you are used to Eudora.
Comment 28•17 years ago
|
||
sorry for the spam. making bugzilla reflect reality as I'm not working on these bugs. filter on FOOBARCHEESE to remove these in bulk.
Comment 30•17 years ago
|
||
Possible idea for an solution, allow edit message for unsent message and make that move the message to the drafts folder before opening it. With that we would prevent sending an old version of a mail, while it's edited.
Updated•17 years ago
|
Comment 31•17 years ago
|
||
This bug (it's such a basic feature it should hardly be considered an enhancement) almost completely defeats the purpose of having an unsent folder (with the only exception being offline message composition). For years, I've had my email client queue messages to be sent a bit later so that if I noticed an error upon or shortly after hitting "send," I could correct it. Having to "edit as new" and then fix all of the line wrapping that Thunderbird induces upon re-edit, and then having to delete the pseudo-duplicate message is simply ridiculous. Also, shouldn't this bug be under "Thunderbird" and not "Core"?
Comment 32•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #31) > This bug (it's such a basic feature it should hardly be considered an > enhancement) almost completely defeats the purpose of having an unsent folder > (with the only exception being offline message composition). For years, I've > had my email client queue messages to be sent a bit later so that if I noticed > an error upon or shortly after hitting "send," I could correct it. Having to > "edit as new" and then fix all of the line wrapping that Thunderbird induces > upon re-edit, and then having to delete the pseudo-duplicate message is simply > ridiculous. I agree completely with this feeling, and BTW I think it's a reason to change it again from enhancement to major, because I also think it's a regression (some time in the past, I could edit an unsent message with Mozilla Application Suite). > Also, shouldn't this bug be under "Thunderbird" and not "Core"? I guess it's in Core because we are heading a common component between Seamonkey and Thunderbird, but I'm not sure.
Comment 33•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #32) > I agree completely with this feeling, and BTW I think it's a reason to change > it again from enhancement to major, because I also think it's a regression > (some time in the past, I could edit an unsent message with Mozilla Application Suite). my apologies, double click opens to edit in netscape 4.x (tested 4.79), so this is 4xp. Thanks for pointing that out. see bug 254738 for netscape behavior and other good info which parallels some of the discussion here. however, not major (even if regression) as this has an easy workaround in "edit as new". see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity "minor=minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present" If you can cite a suite version where this worked feel free to mark regression, but given the age of the bug I doubt it ever worked in suite. > > Also, shouldn't this bug be under "Thunderbird" and not "Core"? > > I guess it's in Core because we are heading a common component between > Seamonkey and Thunderbird, but I'm not sure. Magnus, Phil? As this is "pane centric" I'm guessing it's a UI decision best left to the respective products. If so perhaps bug 254738 should be reopened for Thunderbird.
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Comment 35•16 years ago
|
||
The logic is in ThreadPaneDoubleClick() which is shared: http://mxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/source/mailnews/base/resources/content/threadPane.js#203 Getting it to open for editing is easy, but there's probably a lot of caveats after that... when to remove the original etc.
Comment 36•16 years ago
|
||
re.
> there's probably a lot of caveats after that... when to remove the original etc.
From an end-user's point of view, NS 4.7's method seemed to work fine. I.e. the user double clicks the message, the message opens, the user makes his/her changes to the message, and then upon 'Send Later', the original mesage is replaced.
I.e. from a technical point of view, I don't know, but from an end-user's point fo view, the original should get removed (i.e. replaced with the editted message) when the user selects 'Send Later'. (My opinion.)
Comment 37•16 years ago
|
||
I think it should probably open for reading only by double click, but have a button to open for editing, the same way it is for drafts if you open one in new window from the context menu.
Comment 38•16 years ago
|
||
re.
> I think it should probably open for reading only by double click, but have a
button to open for editing, the same way it is for drafts if you open one in
new window from the context menu.
I don't really agree with the double click opening for reading only. Double click on an email in the 'drafts' window pane opens the message for editting, so why not the same for 'send later'? However I agree with an 'Edit' button in the 'Send Later' pane, it would make it consistent with the 'Drafts' folder operation.
Comment 39•12 years ago
|
||
I composed an invitation, then rethought the date, and saved it in UNSENT MESSAGES. Once I decided on the new date, I EDITed AS NEW and SENT UNSENT MESSAGES. Both versions went out. Now, I'm getting acceptances for both dates. THIS BUG SHOULD HAVE BEEN FIXED A DECADE AGO.
Comment hidden (metoo) |
Comment hidden (metoo) |
Comment 42•5 years ago
|
||
I cannot find a bug that fixed this, but I believe this is WFM. Do you agree?
Comment 43•5 years ago
|
||
When I double-click on an unsent message in my Outbox it is opened in a new tab.
But maybe this was the original feature and this is the expected behavior?
Why should it behave like a message saved in the Drafts folder?
Comment 44•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Eckard Berberich from comment #43)
Why should it behave like a message saved in the Drafts folder?
Because that is the desired behavior of this bug report.
When I double-click on an unsent message in my Outbox it is opened in a new tab.
But maybe this was the original feature and this is the expected behavior?
Yes, original behavior is to just open in display mode. But for me, using current beta, it opens in compose. Now that I think of it, it's worked this way for quite a long time. I didn't test safe mode, but I don't think there's a hidden prefernce for this.
Comment 45•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #44)
Yes, original behavior is to just open in display mode. But for me, using current beta, it opens in compose. Now that I think of it, it's worked this way for quite a long time. I didn't test safe mode, but I don't think there's a hidden prefernce for this.
In my tests there is no difference between the actual version 68.2.2 and 71.0b3. In both versions double-click opens the Outbox message in a new tab and not in a compose window.
Comment 46•5 years ago
|
||
Strange that we don't see the same thing.
Also works for me in safe mode.
Comment 47•5 years ago
|
||
It just opens as a normal message for me (not into compose).
I think it should open like a normal message, but like a draft have the button to start editing. Only with different text in the notification.
Comment 48•5 years ago
|
||
I vote for the comment number 30
A little OT: there's something strange about the fonts on this bug page: they are normal at the beginning , and become too smooth(the style that make almost the entire Web hard to read for me) since comment 42!
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment hidden (spam) |
Updated•2 months ago
|
Description
•