Closed
Bug 40950
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Need xptcall port for linux/ia64
Categories
(Core :: XPCOM, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: jim_nance, Assigned: shaver)
Details
(Keywords: fixed1.4, helpwanted)
Attachments
(2 files)
21.38 KB,
patch
|
brendan
:
approval1.4+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.07 KB,
patch
|
shaver
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
I am attempting to get mozilla going on linux/ia64. So far its been fairly simple to get everything working except the xptcall stuff. This requires someone who knows both ia64 assembler and the internals of g++. There are probably about 10 people in the world who fit that description. I figure half of them work at cygnus. I am hoping that Chris knows who they are and can convince them they want to port this code, which is why I assigned this bug to him.
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
The rumor is that there is a lot left to be desired with C++ support on ia64. I'll ask around though. Maybe someone at Intel already has one done.
Assignee: blizzard → blizzard
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
Sorry, I forgot that it is possible to assign a bug to the owner of the selected component.
Assignee: nobody → jband
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
Assigning this to me is pretty much pointless. We rely on volunteers who are interested and capable of porting to a give platform to provide these platform ports. I'll add this platform to the list on the xptcall status page - http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/status.html - but other than that I don't have a plan for action on this. Anyone who wants to see this port happen should spread the word and find the person to do it.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Keywords: helpwanted
Yes, please add it to the status page. Having it up there may help us find someone to do this port.
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
I continue my quest to concentrate 'nix xptcall bugs in the shaver camp.
Assignee: jband → shaver
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Component: XPConnect → XPCOM
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
I have a "volunteer" for this, and we might get it in time for 0.8.1.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•23 years ago
|
||
My volunteer bailed. Sometime I'll try and use the simulator environment to hack it up myself.
Comment 10•23 years ago
|
||
David Mosberger got something working using libffi. Once I actually get a build that starts, I'll post the patch.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•23 years ago
|
||
Hey Bill, did you get it working? We could use the libffi port to ease our gcc3 woes on other platforms as well...
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
Might be interested in bug 82286 I'll cross post this to that bug. May encounter similar issues.
Comment 13•23 years ago
|
||
Not yet. I can dig up the patch and post it. Basically, the behavior I'm seeing is that mozilla on startup grinds for about 20 seconds or so, and then silently exits 1.
Comment 14•22 years ago
|
||
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146722 Bug 146722 addresses this issue for HPUX on ia64.
Comment 15•21 years ago
|
||
This is a patch that Ulrich sent me and seems to work on Linux. It's derived from the HPUX code, so the copyrights are intact in the file. I already have an rs=shaver on this, so I'll check it in shortly.
Comment 16•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 125960 [details] [diff] [review] patch for linux Just for the record. /be
Attachment #125960 -
Flags: approval1.4+
Comment 17•21 years ago
|
||
Checked in on the tip and the 1.4 branch. Yay!
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•21 years ago
|
Keywords: fixed1.4.1
Updated•21 years ago
|
Keywords: fixed1.4.1 → fixed1.4
Comment 18•19 years ago
|
||
Someone should have updated http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/status.html
Comment 19•19 years ago
|
||
Update status.html with the Linux ia64 status. I determined the contributors of the Linux ia64 xptcall patch based on comment 15 and comment 14.
Attachment #207430 -
Flags: review?(shaver)
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 207430 [details] [diff] [review] Patch for status.html Approved (and implicitly in the future, Wan-Teh, should you want to make further updates).
Attachment #207430 -
Flags: review?(shaver) → review+
Comment 21•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 207430 [details] [diff] [review] Patch for status.html I updated status.html on the Mozilla trunk (1.9 alpha). Checking in status.html; /cvsroot/mozilla/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/status.html,v <-- status.html new revision: 1.29; previous revision: 1.28 done
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•