Closed
Bug 412209
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Support full screen mode in prism webapps
Categories
(Mozilla Labs :: Prism, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: luis, Assigned: tonikitoo)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 5 obsolete files)
3.32 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Would be nice if prism respected the keyboard command for view->full screen so that prism apps could be used in a full screen mode.
Updated•16 years ago
|
Summary: full screen → Support full screen mode
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → tonikitoo
Attachment #338557 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Summary: Support full screen mode → Support full screen mode in prism webapps
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #338557 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle) → review?(matthew.gertner)
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 338557 [details] [diff] [review]
add fullscreen support in webapps
Couldn't we store the fullscreen setting in the JSON file too? We could just use a different value and treat it as a window state.
Also, I think the sidebar block should be outside the "else" block. The sidebar should be respected regardless of fullscreen, right?
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
> Couldn't we store the fullscreen setting in the JSON file too? We could just
> use a different value and treat it as a window state.
done.
> Also, I think the sidebar block should be outside the "else" block. The sidebar
> should be respected regardless of fullscreen, right?
no need after step above.
Attachment #338557 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #338856 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Attachment #338557 -
Flags: review?(matthew.gertner)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
indentation changed accidentally.
see comment #3 for description
Attachment #338856 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #338858 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Attachment #338856 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 338858 [details] [diff] [review]
v0.3
Why do we need the ui.fullscreen pref? Won't the normal load/saveSettings methods remember the fullscreen state and restore it if necessary (with a bit of additional code in those methods).
Also, I think that the full screen constant should be a global const value, not a member variable:
const FULL_SCREEN_STATE_MASK = 0x4;
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
addressed comments from matthew and mark.
Attachment #338858 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #338951 -
Flags: review?
Attachment #338858 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #338951 -
Attachment description: v3 → v0.4
Attachment #338951 -
Flags: review? → review?(mark.finkle)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
Attachment #338951 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #338971 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Attachment #338951 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 338971 [details] [diff] [review]
simpler approach
nice
Attachment #338971 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
un-bitrotted patch.
checking re-ping.
Attachment #338971 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
Completed: At revision: 19012
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 342709 [details] [diff] [review]
simpler approach - (unbitrotted)
[Checkin: Comment 10]
(In reply to comment #10)
http://viewvc.svn.mozilla.org/vc?view=rev&revision=19012
Attachment #342709 -
Attachment description: simpler approach - (unbitrotted) → simpler approach - (unbitrotted)
[Checkin: Comment 10]
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 13•16 years ago
|
||
How about a --fullscreen command-line option?
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•