Closed
Bug 429200
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
mac.com (MobileMe) - Firefox 3 beta 5 does not work with iDisk web interface
Categories
(Web Compatibility :: Site Reports, defect)
Web Compatibility
Site Reports
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: csj, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: regression, relnote)
Attachments
(1 file)
205.78 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9b5) Gecko/2008032620 Firefox/3.0b5
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9b5) Gecko/2008032620 Firefox/3.0b5
Going to a public folder (e.g. the URL I supplied above) or the private space (http://idisk.mac.com/sam247) results in a completely blank page.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Visit http://idisk.mac.com/sam247-Public
Actual Results:
Blank page comes up.
Expected Results:
Expected content to be displayed.
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
Its a screenshot of Firefox Release Candidate 2(left) and Safari 3.1.1(right). Safari display's the page as it should, Firefox doesnt. Url: http://idisk.mac.com/pj.bos-Public?view=web or any other iDisk
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
As far as I'm concerned, this is a critical bug that needs to be addressed before final release. If Firefox 3 is released this way, NO one will be able to access iDisk, period. Unless, of course, until Apple rereleases .Mac as "MobileMe" and changes the interface. But who's to say MobileMe will show up properly, either?
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
Marking as critical. Also modified OS's this bug exists on, fails on Windows, Mac, & Linux.
Severity: normal → critical
Flags: blocking-firefox3?
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: PC → All
Version: unspecified → 3.0 Branch
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
Confirming and adding regression keyword: this worked in Firefox 2. Ria: can you help us find a regression range?
It's a little too late in the game for us to block the final release on this issue at this time. We'll want to consider it for a branch release, though.
I want to suspect that this is a dupe or similar to bug 405903, but I don't see anything in the error console when I load this page. As long as I'm using an RC, I can see that I'm getting the HTML content sent to me (nightlies get bounced to a page that tells them to use Firefox 1.0.4 or later) but it's not rendering.
Severity: critical → major
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Flags: blocking1.9.0.1?
Flags: blocking-firefox3?
Flags: blocking-firefox3.1?
Flags: blocking-firefox3-
Keywords: regression,
relnote
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
Thanks for confirming this, Mike. Hope it's ironed out.
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
Regression range is
http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?module=PhoenixTinderbox&date=explicit&mindate=2006-01-31+12%3A00&maxdate=2006-01-31+23%3A00
When I switch off JavaScript I see the same incomplete screen on all builds, so maybe there is something wrong with the script (Bug 305873).
Comment 7•17 years ago
|
||
If bug 305873 broke this, it's likely because the site is using unclosed script tags in HTML (e.g. <script src="..." />). It shouldn't do that - I don't think we're going to revert that change (it's compatible with IE, fwiw).
Assignee: nobody → english-us
Component: General → English US
Flags: blocking1.9.0.1?
Flags: blocking-firefox3.1?
Flags: blocking-firefox3-
Product: Firefox → Tech Evangelism
QA Contact: general → english-us
Version: 3.0 Branch → unspecified
Comment 8•17 years ago
|
||
Indeed:
var isIE = (document.all);
if (isIE) {
...
} else {
...
'<script src="/js/web/DavUtil.js" TYPE="text/javascript" />' +
...
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•17 years ago
|
||
Thanks guys. I reported this to Apple, let's just hope I don't get some silly canned response asking me to check my Internet connection. :P I was very specific as to what the problem is.
Strange, though, that even in XHTML, <script> is the only tag that breaks the rules and doesn't like being called as <script />.
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•17 years ago
|
||
Sorry guys, but I'm going to have to retract my agreement that Apple is at fault here.
Look here:
http://www.samhulick.com/script_test.html
I have a proper DOCTYPE header and everything. It's XHTML 1.0 strict. W3C says it's A-OK:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.samhulick.com%2Fscript_test.html
So, is W3C wrong?
Comment 13•15 years ago
|
||
When I tried to use iDisk right now using Minefield, it redirected me to this page: http://idisk.mac.com/js/web/browser_req.html.
Do we have any Apple contacts whom we can notify of this issue?
Blocks: geckoisgecko
(In reply to comment #13)
> Do we have any Apple contacts whom we can notify of this issue?
When we had this problem before (e.g. bug 325962), I think we just had dotMac users complain about the UA sniffing via whatever channels are exposed to them :(
Summary: Firefox 3 beta 5 does not work with iDisk web interface → mac.com - Firefox 3 beta 5 does not work with iDisk web interface
Comment 15•14 years ago
|
||
Is this still a problem? I don't have a MobileMe subscription, so I can't test it, but I'd be mildly surprised if the Web interface is still broken after all this time.
Comment 13 really ought to be filed as its own TE bug.
cl
Updated•14 years ago
|
Summary: mac.com - Firefox 3 beta 5 does not work with iDisk web interface → mac.com (MobileMe) - Firefox 3 beta 5 does not work with iDisk web interface
Comment 16•10 years ago
|
||
> Http/1.1 Service Unavailable
The service is long gone.
Assignee: english-us → nobody
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Component: English US → Desktop
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Tech Evangelism → Web Compatibility
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•