See bug 418543. That bug removed a bunch of in-tree references, this bug is about removing support for it entirely.
I think this'd be best before beta builds are released. It should also be possible to combine this with Bug 413141. Anyway, my last comment on this.
Created attachment 340635 [details] [diff] [review] trying to remove -moz-pre-wrap This patch should remove all remnants of -moz-pre-wrap, I hope it is correct. Sorry for my spam earlier. I think I finally got it.
10 years ago
Comment on attachment 340635 [details] [diff] [review] trying to remove -moz-pre-wrap This looks ok, but there are some nsIDocumentEncoder.idl comments that could use fixing too, and this probably needs moa from dbaron.
Created attachment 340707 [details] [diff] [review] v2 (In reply to comment #3) > (From update of attachment 340635 [details] [diff] [review]) > This looks ok, but there are some nsIDocumentEncoder.idl comments that could > use fixing too There was only one line to be changed. However, I did a more careful search and found some appearances of moz-pre-wrap in htmlparser/tests and nsPlainTextSerializer.css - nothing special, though. Should I ask for another sr here?
Created attachment 340722 [details] [diff] [review] v3 Of course we want -moz-pre-wrap to go away...
Attachment #340722 - Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky) → superreview+
Attachment #340722 - Flags: review?(dbaron) → review+
Assignee: nobody → crazy-daniel
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 9 years ago
Keywords: checkin-needed → dev-doc-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9.1b1
So, this breaks three non-Firefox consumers...
Actually I counted that as one "consumer"; my other two were: http://mxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/source/mozilla/extensions/venkman/resources/content/venkman-output-base.css#58 http://mxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/source/mozilla/extensions/irc/xul/content/output-base.css#506
My apologies, I didn't realise that bug 418543 had converted all consumers (at least, all the ones that were includeded in comm-central mxr at the time).
The two in comment 10 are fine, and should stay as they are, I think, since those extensions try to be compatible with old versions of Mozilla as well as current ones. Somebody should patch calendar-views.css, though.
Ah, looks like it was done in bug 458404.
Does this mean that -moz-pre-wrap no longer works at all, or just that we don't use it internally? It's currently documented as deprecated.
(In reply to comment #14) > Does this mean that -moz-pre-wrap no longer works at all Yep. People can still use it in order to support gecko 1.8.*, but for 1.9.1 they need to add pre-wrap, if it's not already there -- which it should, for other browsers.
Docs have removed this from the list of supported values now, although notes are in place suggesting including it when using pre-wrap for backward compatibility purposes.
Keywords: dev-doc-needed → dev-doc-complete
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.