Closed
Bug 437276
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
Update langGroups with data from the IANA registry
Categories
(Core :: Internationalization, defect)
Core
Internationalization
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: 320055323028-0001, Assigned: smontagu)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
8.00 KB,
patch
|
emk
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Opera/9.27 (Windows NT 5.1; U; ru)
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9) Gecko/2008051206 Firefox/3.0
When the text language is set to Oromo (code: om) on any web page, Firefox defaults to the Ethiopic font if one is selected in the font dialog. However, Oromo is written in Latin script since 1991.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. If not already done, download and install any Ethiopic font on your computer.
2. Start Firefox and select your Ethiopic font in the Font dialog under the Ethiopic tab for Serif, Sans and Mono.
3. Visit any website that has lang="om" set in the source code (or write one yourself)
Actual Results:
Firefox uses the Ethiopic font to display the text, which depending on the font can result in hard-to-read text.
Expected Results:
Firefox should default to the Western font and use it to display the text.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
I'm broadening the scope of this bug a bit: I think that any language that has a Suppress-Script value in http://www.iana.org/assignments/language-subtag-registry should have a corresponding definition in langGroups.properties, and can safely have .accept=true defined in languages.properties. I don't include languages where we don't already have a langGroup (e.g. Tibetan, see bug 441110)
It also doesn't make sense to me that there are languages in which we ship a localized version that don't appear in the "preferred language" dialog, so I'm adding a couple of those as well.
Languages affected by the patch:
Code Language Script
ab Abkhazian Cyrillic
ay Aymara Latin
gn Guarani Latin
gv Manx Latin
ht Haitian Latin
kk Kazakh Cyrillic
kl Greenlandic Latin
kok Konkani Devanagari
ku Kurdish Latin (Arabic script is also used; our l10n is Latin)
ln Lingala Latin
mg Malagasy Latin
mh Marshallese Latin
mn Mongolian Cyrillic (Mongolian script is also used; our l10n is Cyrillic)
na Nauru Latin
nd Ndebele, Latin
North
nr Ndebele, Latin
South
nso Sotho, Latin
Northern
ny Chichewa Latin
om Oromo Latin
ps Pashto Arabic
rn Kirundi Latin
rw Kinyarwanda Latin
sm Samoan Latin
ss Siswati Latin
st Sotho, Latin
Southern
ti Tigrinya Ethiopic
tl Tagalog Latin
tn Tswana Latin
to Tonga Latin
ts Tsonga Latin
ur Urdu Arabic
ve Venda Latin
wo Wolof Latin
xh Xhosa Latin
Assignee: nobody → smontagu
Status: UNCONFIRMED → ASSIGNED
Component: General → Internationalization
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows XP → All
Product: Firefox → Core
QA Contact: general → i18n
Hardware: x86 → All
Summary: Firefox uses wrong font for Oromo text → Update langGroups with data from the IANA registry
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
Attachment #368921 -
Flags: review?(VYV03354)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
Attachment #368921 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #368924 -
Flags: review?(VYV03354)
Attachment #368921 -
Flags: review?(VYV03354)
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> Correct patch
I haven't see the patch yet, but what's the difference between two patches?
Interdiff didn't show any differences.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4)
I thought that the first patch didn't have the line
+tl=x-western
but it looks as if hg diff misled me. Sorry about that.
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #368924 -
Flags: review?(VYV03354) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 368924 [details] [diff] [review]
Correct patch
> ht=x-western
> hr=x-central-euro
> # XXX Latin Ext. A is also used for hsb.
> hsb=x-western
>+ht=x-western
Bah, doesn't anyone read their debug spew any more?
I guess the existing one is incorrect, due to alphabetical ordering fail.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
Removed the duplicate entry in http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/1a6d30255368 (rs=Neil on IRC)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•