Closed
Bug 448168
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
Apply |s/entires/entries/g|
Categories
(Core :: General, defect)
Core
General
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla8
People
(Reporter: sgautherie, Assigned: rsesek)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: [inbound])
Attachments
(1 file, 3 obsolete files)
9.46 KB,
patch
|
emorley
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Reporter | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [good first bug]
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
This patch only touches comments, not any code.
Attachment #355148 -
Flags: review?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 355148 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch
This patch is missing
/security/nss/lib/ssl/ssl.h
You need to choose a reviewer:
either a "global" one, or it may be easier to separate the patch per code areas.
Reporter | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → rsesek
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #355148 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #355148 -
Flags: review?
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
> (From update of attachment 355148 [details] [diff] [review])
> This patch is missing
> /security/nss/lib/ssl/ssl.h
>
> You need to choose a reviewer:
> either a "global" one, or it may be easier to separate the patch per code
> areas.
Thanks. I've fixed that one. Where can I find a global reviewer (don't see them listed in the owners list)? If I were to separate this out into the individual modules, that'd be 8 different patches, which seems a little excessive for such a simple change.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> Where can I find a global reviewer (don't see them listed in the owners list)?
Sure, the closest are super-reviewers...
> If I were to separate this out into the individual modules, that'd be 8
> different patches, which seems a little excessive for such a simple change.
No trivial answer: see what is easier to get review(s)...
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
Attachment #355314 -
Flags: review?(dveditz)
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #355314 -
Attachment is patch: true
Attachment #355314 -
Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 355314 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v2
r/sr=dveditz for everything except the two security/nss files. You'll have to get the NSS team to review those.
Attachment #355314 -
Flags: review?(dveditz) → review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
Robert, ping for progress status.
Flags: in-testsuite-
Whiteboard: [good first bug] → [patchlove] [good first bug]
Target Milestone: mozilla1.9.1a2 → ---
Comment 8•14 years ago
|
||
Updated patch on behalf of Robert, so we can get this into the tree. Some of the instances of "entires" no longer exist, but new ones have cropped up. Patch format corrected + author set to Robert.
Re-requesting review due to changes now being made to files not included in the Robert's previous patch.
Attachment #355314 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #543664 -
Flags: review?(dveditz)
Comment 9•14 years ago
|
||
Meant to say that there is now only one instance of "entires" in NSS (http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/security/nss/lib/ssl/ssl.h#386), so have just missed out NSS changes for now.
Whiteboard: [patchlove] [good first bug] → [good first bug]
Updated•14 years ago
|
Assignee: rsesek → bmo
Whiteboard: [good first bug]
Comment 10•14 years ago
|
||
Ping for review (comment only changes). Thanks :-)
Comment 11•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 543664 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v3
Adding alternative reviewer for this comment-only typo fix patch, so we can get a new contributor's first patch into the tree. Thanks :-)
Attachment #543664 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Attachment #543664 -
Flags: review?(roc) → review+
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #543664 -
Flags: review?(dveditz)
Comment 12•14 years ago
|
||
Updated commit message for r=roc, no other changes; carrying forwards r+.
Attachment #543664 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #549967 -
Flags: review+
Updated•14 years ago
|
Assignee: bmo → rsesek
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 13•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #12)
> carrying forwards r+.
This isn't helpful, just adds confusion. You didn't review the patch, dveditz did -- and the patch incorrectly says roc.
Comment 14•14 years ago
|
||
Roc reviewed the newer version, see comment 11.
Point taken about clarity, the feedback is appreciated :-)
Updated•14 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Whiteboard: [inbound]
Comment 15•14 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla8
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•