Open
Bug 452801
Opened 16 years ago
Updated 11 years ago
workflow editor should let people *view* the workflow
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Administration, task, P4)
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: timeless, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
workflows should not be confidential. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html#status isn't confidential. any time you make workflow confidential you confuse everyone and get questions like "how do i get X from A to B".
Blocks: bmo-regressions-0808
Updated•16 years ago
|
Severity: normal → enhancement
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: PC → All
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
Not a regression, simply an enhancement request.
No longer blocks: bmo-regressions-0808
Priority: -- → P5
that's not true, before workflow existed the workflow was public as part of field status now it's a secret.
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
An idea comes to mind. We could use webdot to generate a graph automatically, as we do with showdependencygraph.cgi, and have it in page.cgi?id=fields.html#status.
Priority: P5 → P4
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) > An idea comes to mind. We could use webdot to generate a graph automatically, > as we do with showdependencygraph.cgi, and have it in > page.cgi?id=fields.html#status. Oh, that's a great idea, yeah. Let's do that, if we implement this. We should probably put it in an iframe or something though so that generating it doesn't stop the rest of the page from loading. Or cache the image for a while, or something.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•