Test fail on qm-centos5-moz2-01

RESOLVED INVALID

Status

()

RESOLVED INVALID
10 years ago
10 years ago

People

(Reporter: hello, Unassigned)

Tracking

Trunk
x86
Linux
Points:
---
Dependency tree / graph

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

(URL)

(Reporter)

Description

10 years ago
Build Error Summary

*** 24750 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/docshell/test/navigation/test_opener.html | Test timed out.
*** 24753 INFO Error: Unable to restore focus, expect failures and timeouts.
*** 24760 INFO Error: Unable to restore focus, expect failures and timeouts.
*** 24771 INFO Error: Unable to restore focus, expect failures and timeouts.
*** 24778 INFO Error: Unable to restore focus, expect failures and timeouts.
*** 24785 INFO Error: Unable to restore focus, expect failures and timeouts.
*** 24790 INFO Error: Unable to restore focus, expect failures and timeouts.
*** 33835 ERROR TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | /tests/dom/tests/mochitest/geolocation/test_manyWindows.html | Error thrown during test: windows[i] is null - got 0, expected 1
*** 504 INFO Error: Unable to restore focus, expect failures and timeouts.
*** 507 INFO Error: Unable to restore focus, expect failures and timeouts.
The next cycle went green, and Serge starred the orange build as a known intermittent failure.

Can we resolve this bug and re-open the tree, Sheriff Dan?
What is the point of this bug ?

R.Invalid
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 10 years ago
Depends on: 451090, 451949
Resolution: --- → INVALID

Comment 3

10 years ago
How can this be invalid?  If it's a "known intermittent failure", it could be a duplicate, but not invalid.
(In reply to comment #3)
> How can this be invalid?  If it's a "known intermittent failure", it could be a
> duplicate, but not invalid.

I couldn't duplicate it to 2 bugs ... I chose a "less bad" resolution.
Feel free to duplicate it to the first one if you prefer.

(And I have started to tag the waterfall with "known intermittent failure" because I got bored of pointing out the exact bug (numbers) which have been reported for weeks.)

Please, don't re-add me a third time, unless you answer comment 2 and tell me what you expect of me !

Comment 5

10 years ago
Sorry, Serge.  I didn't see the dependencies, which you added the first time you resolved this as INVALID.
NoProblem...

I wish Dan would have bothered to file bug 456651 instead !
(Reporter)

Comment 7

10 years ago
qm-win2k3-moz2-01 was green when this bug was filed.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.