Closed
Bug 461542
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
consolidate the (unix) start scripts for our applications
Categories
(Toolkit :: Startup and Profile System, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.9.1b3
People
(Reporter: mpk, Assigned: mpk)
References
Details
(Keywords: fixed1.9.1)
Attachments
(2 files, 3 obsolete files)
17.50 KB,
patch
|
standard8
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
17.98 KB,
patch
|
benjamin
:
review+
beltzner
:
approval1.9.1+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
While discussing bug 363173 on IRC this week we discovered that some of our start scripts (the ones usually generated from mozilla.in) are actually a bit out of date. The ones for XULRunner and Sunbird are quite affected, but the ones for SeaMonkey, Firefox and Thunderbird could also benefit from small tweaks, which found their way into one or several of the others. I'll attach the patches shortly. They were inspired by the fixes for the following bugs: - bug 280725 - bug 384714 - bug 386582 - bug 389673
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
Does this patch require sr as well, since it touches several files? If so, who would be a good requestee?
Attachment #344639 -
Flags: review?(benjamin)
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
Attachment #344641 -
Flags: review?(benjamin)
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #344639 -
Flags: review?(benjamin)
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 344639 [details] [diff] [review] consolidation patches for firefox and xulrunner (mozilla-central) Is there any difference at all between browser/app/mozilla.in and xulrunner/app/mozilla.in? If not, can we just share the file rather than having two copies of it? Please re-request review if this is won't work for some reason.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
Yeah, that might actually work. No, mozilla.in would be absolutely identical across all applications. Not only for browser and xulrunner, but for suite, mail and calendar as well. Now I just have to find out how to achieve this without breaking anything else... ;-) I'll post some new patches as soon as I find a clean solution.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
Attachment #344639 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #346739 -
Flags: review?
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #346739 -
Flags: review? → review?(benjamin)
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #346739 -
Flags: review?(benjamin) → review+
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #344641 -
Flags: review?(benjamin)
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
Attachment #344641 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #346956 -
Flags: review?(bugzilla)
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #346739 -
Flags: approval1.9.1b2?
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 7•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 346956 [details] [diff] [review] comm-central patch (needs the m-c patch checked in first!) [Checkin: Comment 15] Looks good. Just for the record, the big set of differences between Sunbird's mozilla.in and the others are mainly due to bug 280725 not being applied there. r=me.
Attachment #346956 -
Flags: review?(bugzilla) → review+
Comment 8•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 346739 [details] [diff] [review] mozilla-central patch, with one central mozilla.in file Let's wait until after the beta.
Attachment #346739 -
Flags: approval1.9.1b2?
Attachment #346739 -
Flags: approval1.9.1b2-
Attachment #346739 -
Flags: approval1.9.1+
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
The introduction of GLOBAL_DEPS last week (see bug 463824) broke my m-c patch, impacting Firefox, XULRunner and Fennec (on *nix). This updated version fixes this and also removes the execute flag from the mozilla.in since it gets set on the actual startup script upon its' creation anyway (through the Makefile). Please note that this patch still is a prerequisite for my c-c patch.
Attachment #346739 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #350755 -
Flags: review?(benjamin)
Attachment #350755 -
Flags: approval1.9.1?
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #346739 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #346739 -
Flags: approval1.9.1b2-
Attachment #346739 -
Flags: approval1.9.1+
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #350755 -
Flags: review?(benjamin) → review+
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 350755 [details] [diff] [review] mozilla-central patch v3 [Checkin: Comment 11 & 14] a191=beltzner
Attachment #350755 -
Flags: approval1.9.1? → approval1.9.1+
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 350755 [details] [diff] [review] mozilla-central patch v3 [Checkin: Comment 11 & 14] http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/72a4c2b4e160
Attachment #350755 -
Attachment description: mozilla-central patch v3 → mozilla-central patch v3
[Checkin: Comment 11]
Updated•16 years ago
|
Flags: in-testsuite-
Whiteboard: [c-n: m-c is baking for 1.9.1, c-c depends on it]
Comment 12•16 years ago
|
||
there was a significant Ts hit on Linux around the time this was checked in: http://graphs.mozilla.org/graph.html#show=1431030,395123,395133,395164&sel=1228763058,1229025120 could this have been responsible?
Comment 13•16 years ago
|
||
never mind, it's this: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464995#c20
Comment 14•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 350755 [details] [diff] [review] mozilla-central patch v3 [Checkin: Comment 11 & 14] http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-1.9.1/rev/09ea61756b7a
Attachment #350755 -
Attachment description: mozilla-central patch v3
[Checkin: Comment 11] → mozilla-central patch v3
[Checkin: Comment 11 & 14]
Updated•16 years ago
|
Keywords: fixed1.9.1
Whiteboard: [c-n: m-c is baking for 1.9.1, c-c depends on it] → [c-n: m-c part is baking on 1.9.1, before c-c part]
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9.1b3
Comment 15•16 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 346956 [details] [diff] [review] comm-central patch (needs the m-c patch checked in first!) [Checkin: Comment 15] http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/1818c8fa024f
Attachment #346956 -
Attachment description: comm-central patch (needs the m-c patch checked in first!) → comm-central patch (needs the m-c patch checked in first!)
[Checkin: Comment 15]
Updated•16 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Keywords: checkin-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [c-n: m-c part is baking on 1.9.1, before c-c part]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•