Closed Bug 483797 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

Move the pkcs11 headers from softoken to utils

Categories

(mozilla.org :: CVS: Copy, task, P1, major)

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: elio.maldonado.batiz, Assigned: reed)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: FIPS)

Attachments

(2 files, 2 obsolete files)

Attached file move script (obsolete) —
See bug 482742, moving these headers will break the circular dependency of softoken and utils and allows us to build utils as a stand-alone package.
Attachment #367775 - Flags: review?(nelson)
It seems we're still deciding if we really want to do this, or some 
alternative plan.  If & when we decide to do this, I will give the 
attachment to this bug an r+ and then reassign this bug to 
product: mozilla.org
component: CVS:Copy
Bob, your decision will determine if the contents of the "move script" 
attached to this bug is correct & desired, or not.
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Whiteboard: FIPS [Waiting for input/decision from Bob Relyea]
Comment on attachment 367775 [details]
move script

It seems we've decided not to move the *i.h files.  So, please make another move script that doesn't move those.
Attachment #367775 - Flags: review?(nelson) → review-
Attached file move only public pkcs11 headers (obsolete) —
Attachment #367775 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #369021 - Flags: review?(nelson)
Attachment #369021 - Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
Assignee: nobody → server-ops
Severity: normal → critical
Component: Libraries → CVS: Copy
Priority: -- → P1
Product: NSS → mozilla.org
QA Contact: libraries → mrz
Whiteboard: FIPS [Waiting for input/decision from Bob Relyea] → FIPS
Target Milestone: 3.12.3 → ---
Version: 3.12.3 → other
Attachment #369021 - Flags: review?(nelson) → review+
Comment on attachment 369021 [details]
move only public pkcs11 headers

Moz ops:
Please run this copy script ASAP, this week. 
Thanks.
Assignee: server-ops → dmoore
critical == within 8 hours and pages people.  This isn't blocking anything to the point where it's pagable.  Thanks.
Severity: critical → major
Dave, Are the meanings of the severities for the mozilla.org "product"
posted anywhere?  

This bug is a blocker for the NSS 3.12.3 release which is presently slipping
(was to have released last week).  But it's not yet a panic.
Assignee: dmoore → reed
[root@dm-cvs01 mozilla]# /opt/cvsmgmt/verify-bulk-copy.pl < /opt/cvsmgmt/483797 
destination directory security/nss/lib/utils does not exist, will be created
destination directory security/nss/lib/utils does not exist, will be created
destination directory security/nss/lib/utils does not exist, will be created
destination directory security/nss/lib/utils does not exist, will be created
destination directory security/nss/lib/utils does not exist, will be created
destination directory security/nss/lib/utils does not exist, will be created

Do you really mean security/nss/lib/util/ instead? If so, please attach a new cvscopy file.
(In reply to comment #7)
> Dave, Are the meanings of the severities for the mozilla.org "product"
> posted anywhere?  

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=mozilla.org&format=itrequest
toggle the Urgency popup around and descriptions will show up on the right for the ones that page people.  They're not the same names, but it's a 1:1 mapping to severity and they're in the same order.
Attachment #369143 - Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
Attached file copy transcript
Remember, it's up to you to remove the old files.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Thanks, Reed.  In this bug, I learned about a new way to file mozilla.org
bugs (which I never saw before: is that page findable?  Is there a link to
it from the normal new bug page?) and I learned about a script that can be
used to test copy scripts, which is a useful thing for review!

Thanks again.
(In reply to comment #13)
> In this bug, I learned about a new way to file mozilla.org
> bugs (which I never saw before: is that page findable?  Is there a link to
> it from the normal new bug page?)

That form is mostly for MoCo employees needing to file confidential IT requests, as it's not meant for the public (and, therefore, isn't listed anywhere). It allows a user to file a bug that only IT can see (unless you uncheck the box at the bottom). I don't like the form, personally, as I can do everything it can do just with normal Bugzilla. :)

(In reply to comment #13)
> and I learned about a script that can be
> used to test copy scripts, which is a useful thing for review!

Yeah, we've had it for years... always good to verify stuff before playing with the actual CVS ,v files. ;)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.