Closed
Bug 492477
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
mochitest-plain: toolkit/components/alerts/test/test_alerts.html needs to report success
Categories
(Firefox :: Shell Integration, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Firefox 3.7a5
People
(Reporter: sgautherie, Assigned: MatsPalmgren_bugz)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug, )
Details
(Whiteboard: [fixed by bug 567931])
{ http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=Firefox/1242092605.1242096280.17513.gz&fulltext=1 OS X 10.5.2 mozilla-central unit test on 2009/05/11 18:43:25 *** 75247 INFO Running /tests/toolkit/components/alerts/test/test_alerts.html... *** 75248 INFO TEST-KNOWN-FAIL | /tests/toolkit/components/alerts/test/test_alerts.html | [SimpleTest.report()] No checks actually run. }
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
This is simple, the test boxes don't have Growl installed so there is no alerts system to test. The solution would to a) install Growl and make sure it is always running, b) insert a tautology into the test or c) just ignore it.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
b- An ok(true, "No installed Growl to test") (or a todo(false, ...)) would be fine.
Summary: mochitest-plain: toolkit/components/alerts/test/test_alerts.html needs to report success/failure → mochitest-plain: toolkit/components/alerts/test/test_alerts.html needs to report success
Reporter | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Comment 3•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1) > This is simple, the test boxes don't have Growl installed so there is no alerts > system to test. Do you know why we're not falling back to the custom implementation?
Reporter | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → matspal
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Depends on: 567931
Flags: in-testsuite-
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [fixed by bug 567931]
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 3.7a5
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3) > Do you know why we're not falling back to the custom implementation? No answer in 5.5 months: question copied to (related!?) bug 611540 comment 7.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Do you know why we're not falling back to the custom implementation? > > question copied to (related!?) bug 611540 comment 7. I eventually filed bug 612411.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•