Closed
Bug 493560
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Upgrade to SQLite 3.6.14.2
Categories
(Toolkit :: Storage, defect)
Toolkit
Storage
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.9.2a1
People
(Reporter: sdwilsh, Assigned: sdwilsh)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
625 bytes,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #489442 +++ We'll be taking a special branch containing two fixes - one we need, and one recommended by the SQLite folks. Fixes this will contain on top of 3.6.14: http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/tktview?tn=3841 (we need this one for places) http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/tktview?tn=3844 (suggested that we take this)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
I've pushed this to the try server to verify that there are no performance regressions or unit test regressions.
Attachment #378071 -
Flags: review?(bugmail)
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [needs review asuth]
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Are the SQLite folks going to officially release 3.6.14.1? It is not public/visible on their site currently. If not, how are distributions that build using system SQLite supposed to meet the configure requirement?
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
It's still in QA on their end - we are working in parallel (and I obviously won't land this until they give me the all clear).
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #378071 -
Flags: review?(bugmail) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [needs review asuth] → [can land when all clear]
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Looks OK on the try server (one known random orange did happen on windows, so I'm running it again). Still waiting for the SQLite folks to sign off.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Got the all clear last night, and it's been released on the SQLite website.
Whiteboard: [can land when all clear] → [can land]
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/dd3d70e5849e http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/4480c18255f2
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [can land]
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9.2a1
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #378071 -
Flags: approval1.9.1?
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 378071 [details] [diff] [review] v1.0 I'd really like to get this on 1.9.1 so that we can bumb the min-version of SQLite so folks don't try to ship with a known-bad system SQLite. It'll also fix the two bugs this blocks on branch, as well as get us some minor performance and stability wins (we were previously on 3.6.10).
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
Needs more baking before we'd take it on 191
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #8) > Needs more baking before we'd take it on 191 Right, I don't expect approval today.
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
This was backed out with changeset: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/cc61db43d445 Shouldn't this be re-opened ?
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #10) > Shouldn't this be re-opened ? Yes, this was backed out because it was thought to have caused orange on the tree. It turns out it wasn't the culprit. I was going to land this this morning, but now the tree is closed and only accepting blockers, so it looks like this won't make 1.9.1 :(
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #378071 -
Flags: approval1.9.1?
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 378071 [details] [diff] [review] v1.0 Needs to bake on trunk before we would consider it.
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #378071 -
Flags: approval1.9.1?
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 378071 [details] [diff] [review] v1.0 So, this can't land on 1.9.1 because it hasn't landed on mozilla-central and baked. I can't land it on mozilla-central unless I get approval for 1.9.1. I'm requesting approval in order to get it on mozilla-central, where we can then evaluate if we want it for 1.9.1.
Comment 14•15 years ago
|
||
Shawn, can you push the new SQLite into mozilla-central without approval for 1.9.1? This upgrade fixes bug 489589 anyway. If new other bugs will be introduced by upgrading, I will try fix it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #14) > Shawn, can you push the new SQLite into mozilla-central without approval for > 1.9.1? > > This upgrade fixes bug 489589 anyway. If new other bugs will be introduced by > upgrading, I will try fix it. Not per tree rules right now, unless those have changed without my knowledge.
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•15 years ago
|
||
SQLite just released a new version for a bug fix that we are highly unlikely to hit. This is version 3.6.14.2, so I'm updating the patches for this bug. I pushed this to the try server to make sure all is good (things look good locally). The change in question is http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/tktview?tn=3879
Status: REOPENED → NEW
Summary: Upgrade to SQLite 3.6.14.1 → Upgrade to SQLite 3.6.14.2
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•15 years ago
|
||
This shouldn't need a new review.
Attachment #378071 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #378071 -
Flags: approval1.9.1?
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [baking on tryserver]
Comment 18•15 years ago
|
||
I confirmed version 3.6.14.2 fixed bug 489589.
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•15 years ago
|
||
I am sufficient convinced that this isn't going to cause any problems based on a few try server runs.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Whiteboard: [baking on tryserver]
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [can land]
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•15 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/77f92242f164 http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/11e357b100c0
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago → 15 years ago
Flags: wanted1.9.1.x?
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [can land]
Comment 21•15 years ago
|
||
Taking this on 1.9.1 would fix the #20 topcrash (bug 503770).
Comment 22•15 years ago
|
||
Bug 508104 is the one Shawn is trying to land on 1.9.1.
Updated•15 years ago
|
Flags: wanted1.9.1.x?
Assignee | ||
Comment 23•15 years ago
|
||
In fact, I'd rather take bug 508104 because we've at least shipped an alpha with it. We didn't ship anything but nightlies with this release.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•