Error: GetSelectedMessages is not defined Source File: chrome://messenger/content/messengerdnd.js Line: 452 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1pre) Gecko/20090621 Shredder/3.0b3pre
<http://mxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/source/mail/base/content/SearchDialog.js#567> says we don't support drag and drop in the thread pane. Is there a reason to keep messengerdnd.js? I'd also like to either move messengerdnd.js to suite or get rid of it completely, but this is what I quickly came up with.
Assignee: nobody → sid.bugzilla
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #386129 - Flags: review?(mkmelin+mozilla)
That's odd. I'm pretty sure d'n'd from search worked at least in tb3beta2... Yeah thunderbird should get rid of messengerdnd.js.
(In reply to comment #1) > Created an attachment (id=386129) [details] > possible fix "possible", as in it's not clear this fixes it?
(In reply to comment #2) > That's odd. I'm pretty sure d'n'd from search worked at least in tb3beta2... > Yeah thunderbird should get rid of messengerdnd.js. so then we won't need to care about bug 456156, bug 446292 and bug 446288?
(In reply to comment #3) > "possible", as in it's not clear this fixes it? As in get's rid of the exception, but dragging doesn't work.
Attachment #386129 - Flags: review?(mkmelin+mozilla) → review-
Straightforward, and works nicely here.
Comment on attachment 399094 [details] [diff] [review] proper fix yay! r=mkmelin
Attachment #399094 - Flags: review?(mkmelin+mozilla) → review+
Flags: blocking-thunderbird3? → blocking-thunderbird3+
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 3.0b4
http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/9b7f6edb75fa Setting in-testsuite? since I hope we'll cover drag/drop in our test suite at some point in the future.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Filed bug 515397 about not shipping messengerdnd.js with Thunderbird.
v.fixed 20090909 build. yay! again. Thanks sid.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
(In reply to comment #0) Are you sure this is related to (bug 497199 ->) bug 474701? (In reply to comment #2) > That's odd. I'm pretty sure d'n'd from search worked at least in tb3beta2... You sure? It looks like this occurrence was simply missed in bug 414038 comment 116?!
I never verified which bug it's related to, but yeah iirc i verified it worked with beta2
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.