Closed
Bug 506041
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
Part 2: Correct misspellings in source code
Categories
(Core :: General, defect)
Core
General
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: mkohler, Assigned: mkohler)
References
Details
Attachments
(8 files, 35 obsolete files)
5.52 KB,
patch
|
timeless
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
46.18 KB,
patch
|
nelson
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
13.39 KB,
patch
|
nelson
:
review-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
4.37 KB,
patch
|
timeless
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
2.08 KB,
patch
|
nelson
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
183.54 KB,
patch
|
mkohler
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
4.78 KB,
patch
|
mkohler
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
10.84 KB,
patch
|
mkohler
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Since bug 106386 gets bigger and bigger I decided to open a new bug for newer misspellings.
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=differnet
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
to do by someone who knows how to do cvs patches:
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=loose&find=%2Fsecurity
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=mutliple&find=%2Fsecurity
Updated•15 years ago
|
Alias: spelling
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla1.9.1/search?string=ouput
Note a patch fixing this is not just comments-only - nsIAccessibleProvider.idl requires a change in a property name, so the UUID must be updated at the same time.
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=+teh+&case=on&find=%2F&findi=&filter=^[^\0]*%24&hitlimit=&tree=mozilla-central
This gives the result of "teh" without the Arabic letter of the same name.
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
This is probably where you say, "I'm sorry I asked!"
I went through the list of 100 most misspelled words to see what I could come up with. (I apologize if there are duplicates from the other comments.)
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=threshhold&find=%2F&findi=&filter=^[^\0]*%24&hitlimit=&tree=mozilla-central
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=supercede&find=%2F&findi=&filter=^[^\0]*%24&hitlimit=&tree=mozilla-central
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=seperate&find=%2F&findi=&filter=^[^\0]*%24&hitlimit=&tree=mozilla-central
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=+refrence&find=%2F&findi=&filter=^[^\0]*%24&hitlimit=&tree=mozilla-central
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=refered&find=%2F&findi=&filter=^[^\0]*%24&hitlimit=&tree=mozilla-central
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=recieve&find=%2F&findi=&filter=^[^\0]*%24&hitlimit=&tree=mozilla-central
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=priviledge&find=%2F&findi=&filter=^[^\0]*%24&hitlimit=&tree=mozilla-central
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=preceed&find=%2F&findi=&filter=^[^\0]*%24&hitlimit=&tree=mozilla-central
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=occurrance&find=%2F&findi=&filter=^[^\0]*%24&hitlimit=&tree=mozilla-central
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=noticable&find=%2F&findi=&filter=^[^\0]*%24&hitlimit=&tree=mozilla-central
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=judgement&find=%2F&findi=&filter=^[^\0]*%24&hitlimit=&tree=mozilla-central
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=independant&find=%2F&findi=&filter=^[^\0]*%24&hitlimit=&tree=mozilla-central
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=existance&find=%2F&findi=&filter=^[^\0]*%24&hitlimit=&tree=mozilla-central
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=changable&find=%2F&findi=&filter=^[^\0]*%24&hitlimit=&tree=mozilla-central
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 13•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 14•15 years ago
|
||
57 * Initialize the reader with the edia stream.
s/edia/media/
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/content/media/ogg/nsChannelReader.h#57
Comment 15•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 16•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 17•15 years ago
|
||
Depends on: 241181
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•15 years ago
|
||
I will create a first patch tomorrow.
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•15 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•15 years ago
|
||
This and the following patches are splitted up per component (or a few components together). These patches change the following misspellings:
differnet -> different
loose -> lose
ouput -> output
implment -> implement
occured -> occurred
mainted -> maintained
teh -> the
untill -> until
seperated -> separated
refrence -> reference
refered -> referred
prefered -> preferred
priviledge -> privilege
preceeding -> preceding
preceeds -> preceds
occurrance -> occurrence
noticable -> noticeable
independant -> independent
changable -> changeable
existance -> existence
existant -> existent
elipse -> ellipse
bahaviour -> behaviour
supress -> suppress
supercede -> supersede
recieve -> receive
Attachment #441369 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441370 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441371 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 23•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441372 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441373 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 25•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441374 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 26•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441375 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 27•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441376 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441377 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Attachment #441369 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Attachment #441370 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 29•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441378 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 30•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441379 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 31•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441382 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 32•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441383 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Attachment #441371 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
(In reply to comment #20)
> supercede -> supersede
What's wrong with supercede?
(In reply to comment #33)
> (In reply to comment #20)
> > supercede -> supersede
>
> What's wrong with supercede?
Meh, ignore that. I suppose it's technically an error, and it's certainly just bikeshedding :-)
Attachment #441372 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Comment 35•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441373 [details] [diff] [review]
db / dom - misspellings
please exclude sqlite, they have their own bug tracker. i've been meaning to send them a patch for spelling stuff (based on work i did on Symbian).
+ this.assertNull(transport.getHeader('X-Inexistent'));
this should be nonexistent
(the word shouldn't be hyphentated.)
otherwise everything else is ok.
Attachment #441373 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review-
Comment 36•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441374 [details] [diff] [review]
intl / ipc - misspellings
chromium has an upstream, please send this patch to them.
Attachment #441374 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review-
Comment 37•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441375 [details] [diff] [review]
js - misspellings
drop js/src/ctypes/libffi/ChangeLog
libffi should have an upstream, so a patch should be sent to it.
otherwise this looks fine.
Attachment #441375 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review-
Comment 38•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441376 [details] [diff] [review]
layout/media - misspellings
libfishsound/liboggz/libtheora/libvorbis have upstreams, please file bugs to them - i think it's all the same upstream.
Attachment #441376 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review-
Comment 39•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441377 [details] [diff] [review]
modules/netwerk - misspellings
freetype should have an upstream (although it's possibly defunct)
Attachment #441377 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review-
Comment 40•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441378 [details] [diff] [review]
nsprpub/parser - misspellings
split nspr from parser, nspr requires a distinct committer.
occuring(sp)
Attachment #441378 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review-
Attachment #441379 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review?(nelson)
Comment 41•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441379 [details] [diff] [review]
security - misspellings
this looks good to me, but nelson has to do the commit (he can probably do the nspr commit too).
Comment 42•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441382 [details] [diff] [review]
testing/toolkit - misspellings
google-breakpad has an upstream. please file it and then exclude. otherwise it looks good to me.
Attachment #441382 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review-
Attachment #441383 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Comment 43•15 years ago
|
||
The above "security" patch includes patches to files in two Mozilla modules,
which are: PSM and NSS. I have separated out the PSM part into this file.
Timeless, I'll let you review and/or commit this, if you wish.
I will convert the NSS part of the above security patch to a CVS diff and
attach it to this bug, and then review it.
Attachment #441401 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Comment 44•15 years ago
|
||
This is the NSS part of the above (now obsoleted) "security" patch.
I will review this.
Attachment #441379 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441404 -
Flags: review?(nelson)
Attachment #441379 -
Flags: review?(nelson)
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #441404 -
Attachment description: NSS part of the above "security" patch, coverted to CVS diff → NSS part of the above "security" patch, converted to CVS diff
Comment 45•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441404 [details] [diff] [review]
NSS part of the above "security" patch, converted to CVS diff (partially committed)
This patch is not "atomic". It need not be accepted or rejected
as a whole. Parts of it can be accepted, and other parts rejected.
That's what I'm going to do. I have accepted and committed parts
of this patch (as noted below) and so will mark this r+. But I will
soon attach another patch which is the remnant of this patch that
I did not accept, and I will explain why.
Bug 506041: Correct misspellings in source code comments
Patch contributed by Michael Kohler <michaelkohler@live.com>, r=nelson
coreconf/jniregen.pl; new: 1.5; previous: 1.4
coreconf/outofdate.pl; new: 1.3; previous: 1.2
coreconf/rules.mk; new: 1.83; previous: 1.82
nss/cmd/bltest/blapitest.c; new: 1.59; previous: 1.58
nss/cmd/crlutil/crlutil.c; new: 1.33; previous: 1.32
nss/cmd/lib/SECerrs.h; new: 1.20; previous: 1.19
nss/cmd/pk11mode/pk11mode.c; new: 1.28; previous: 1.27
nss/lib/certdb/alg1485.c; new: 1.40; previous: 1.39
nss/lib/ckfw/capi/crsa.c; new: 1.4; previous: 1.3
nss/lib/ckfw/nssmkey/mobject.c; new: 1.5; previous: 1.4
nss/lib/crmf/crmf.h; new: 1.4; previous: 1.3
nss/lib/libpkix/pkix_pl_nss/system/pkix_pl_mutex.c; new: 1.7; previous: 1.6
nss/lib/libpkix/pkix/top/pkix_build.c new: 1.58; previous: 1.57
nss/lib/nss/nss.h; new: 1.80; previous: 1.79
nss/lib/pk11wrap/pk11merge.c; new: 1.7; previous: 1.6
nss/lib/pk11wrap/pk11nobj.c; new: 1.12; previous: 1.11
nss/lib/pk11wrap/pk11pub.h; new: 1.32; previous: 1.31
nss/lib/pk11wrap/pk11util.c; new: 1.58; previous: 1.57
nss/lib/pkcs12/p12d.c; new: 1.46; previous: 1.45
nss/lib/pkcs12/p12dec.c; new: 1.7; previous: 1.6
nss/lib/pki/nsspkit.h; new: 1.7; previous: 1.6
nss/lib/smime/cms.h; new: 1.23; previous: 1.22
nss/lib/smime/cmssiginfo.c; new: 1.32; previous: 1.31
nss/lib/ssl/sslcon.c; new: 1.40; previous: 1.39
nss/lib/ssl/sslgathr.c; new: 1.12; previous: 1.11
nss/lib/ssl/sslsock.c; new: 1.67; previous: 1.66
nss/lib/util/portreg.c; new: 1.7; previous: 1.6
nss/lib/util/secdig.h; new: 1.9; previous: 1.8
nss/lib/zlib/deflate.h; new: 1.6; previous: 1.5
nss/tests/cert/cert.sh; new: 1.57; previous: 1.56
nss/tests/dbtests/dbtests.sh; new: 1.23; previous: 1.22
nss/tests/pkcs11/netscape/trivial/trivial.c; new: 1.5; previous: 1.4
Attachment #441404 -
Attachment description: NSS part of the above "security" patch, converted to CVS diff → NSS part of the above "security" patch, converted to CVS diff (partially committed)
Attachment #441404 -
Flags: review?(nelson) → review+
Comment 46•15 years ago
|
||
This patch serves to document the part of the above NSS patch that cannot be
checked into the NSS trunk in its present form. There are three different
reasons:
1) We cannot change the names of members of structures declared in public
header files once those have been released. So, we cannot rename the members
from "priviledge" to "privilege", much as we might wish. What we CAN do is
add a #define to add a synonym with the correct spelling.
2) Some of the files patched here are part of a body of code that has been
certified by the US government as cryptographically sound, and *ANY* changes
to those files (even to comments) invalidate that certification, necessitating
a new certification. So, we make those changes on a branch which we hold
until the next time we plan to go through a certification. We JUST finished
a certification earlier this month, so it will be some time before we do
another. This applies to the files in "softoken".
3. The sqlite3 file is a file we take from an upstream source. We strongly
prefer to make only the absolutely necessary changes to the source as received from that upstream, and keep all changes out unless they are absolutely necessary for the correct execution of the code, which clearly comments do
not affect. I'd suggest you send your corrections for the sqlite3 code to
the upstream source. If they're part of the next release we take from that
upstream source, then we'll get those changes that way.
I suggest you do as follows:
1) submit a new patch attached to this bug, to address the "priviledge" issue with a synonym, and ask me to review it.
2) File a new bug against product NSS about the proposed changes for the
files in softoken. We'll get that into the review process for that code.
3) send your sqlite3 changes to the sqlite3 upstream, whereever that is.
Attachment #441408 -
Flags: review-
Comment 47•15 years ago
|
||
This is the alternative I proposed above to fix the misspelled priviledge
members without actually changing the names of the members in the struct.
Michael, does this satisfy you?
If so, Timeless, please review & I'll give credit for this patch to Michael.
Attachment #441423 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Attachment #441401 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Comment 48•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441423 [details] [diff] [review]
NSS patch for the alternative priviledge->privilege fix (committed)
you should probably add a comment to keythi.h explaining the defines.
Attachment #441423 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 49•15 years ago
|
||
Nelson, sure it satisfies me, well done! And please feel free to take credits for yourself.
I will update the other patches in a few hours.
Assignee | ||
Comment 50•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441373 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441571 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #441571 -
Attachment description: dom v2 (without ipc now) → dom v2 (without db now)
Assignee | ||
Comment 51•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441374 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441572 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 52•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441375 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441574 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 53•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441376 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441576 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 54•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441378 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441578 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 55•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441579 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 56•15 years ago
|
||
uploaded too early, I'm sorry for bugspam.
Attachment #441578 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441582 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Attachment #441578 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 57•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441377 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441584 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 58•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441382 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441585 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 59•15 years ago
|
||
Found another patch which you've not yet seen. Did I upload every updated patch of the r- patches? I think I didn't forget something.
Attachment #441588 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 60•15 years ago
|
||
to do in a future patch:
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=judgement -> judgment
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=threshhold -> threshold?
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=sepcify -> specifiy
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?find=/&string=non-existent -> nonexistent
Comment 61•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441571 [details] [diff] [review]
dom v2 (without db now)
didn't we agree on nonexistent instead of non-existent? :(
X-nonexistent
should be
X-Nonexistent
to match the style.
Attachment #441571 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review-
Attachment #441572 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Comment 62•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441574 [details] [diff] [review]
js v2
inexistent => nonexistent
non-existent => nonexistent
Attachment #441574 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review-
Comment 63•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441576 [details] [diff] [review]
layout/media v2
:(, exclude libogg
Non-existent => Nonexistent
Attachment #441576 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review-
Comment 64•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441579 [details] [diff] [review]
nsprpub v2
nonexistence
nelson: can you commit this?
Attachment #441579 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Attachment #441579 -
Flags: review?(nelson)
Attachment #441579 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #441582 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Comment 65•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441584 [details] [diff] [review]
modules/netwerk v2
sorry
libimg/png is a third party library http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=105624&group_id=5624&func=browse
modules/zlib is http://www.gzip.org/zlib/zlib_faq.html#faq08
everything else is fine.
Attachment #441584 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review-
Attachment #441585 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Comment 66•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441588 [details] [diff] [review]
other-licenses - misspellings
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=373085&group_id=22049&func=browse
Attachment #441588 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review-
Comment 67•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441579 [details] [diff] [review]
nsprpub v2
I'm giving this an r+ in principle. But the master source repository for NSPR is CVS, so I'll know for sure if this applies cleanly when I convert this patch to a CVS patch.
Attachment #441579 -
Flags: review?(nelson) → review+
Comment 68•15 years ago
|
||
"judgement" actually is a valid, if less-common, spelling, just so you know. I don't mind the change, but quite strictly speaking it's unnecessary.
Assignee | ||
Comment 69•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #61)
> (From update of attachment 441571 [details] [diff] [review])
> didn't we agree on nonexistent instead of non-existent? :(
>
> X-nonexistent
> should be
> X-Nonexistent
> to match the style.
missed that, sorry.
(In reply to comment #65)
> (From update of attachment 441584 [details] [diff] [review])
> sorry
>
> libimg/png is a third party library
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=105624&group_id=5624&func=browse
>
> modules/zlib is http://www.gzip.org/zlib/zlib_faq.html#faq08
>
> everything else is fine.
I'll file bugs when I get home this evening (CET). Also I'll update the other patches. I thought I'd do the change from non-existent to nonexistent in a future patch since this is used over all components. But I'll update these patches to nonexistent, sorry for this misunderstanding.
Thanks for using that much time to review, timeless. :)
Nelson, could you please change the nit from comment 64 when converting to a CVS patch?
Assignee | ||
Comment 70•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441574 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441708 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 71•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441576 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441710 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Comment 72•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441708 [details] [diff] [review]
js v3
for components which are hard to change (nss, nspr), it makes sense to roll non-existent => nonexistent changes together. for this patch, it's ok to get it later.
Attachment #441708 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Attachment #441710 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review-
Comment 73•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441710 [details] [diff] [review]
layout/media v3
sorry... liboggplay is part of the same xiph stuff
https://trac.xiph.org/
Assignee | ||
Comment 74•15 years ago
|
||
I will file bugs with patches in the upstreams' tracker. Right now I can't do it because I'm heading to school.
BTW, is there any list of third-party-libraries I could use for future patches to save time for you, timeless?
Comment 75•15 years ago
|
||
Do you have a list of misspelled words that you're planning to correct but
have not yet corrected? If so, would you put it in a comment here?
I'd rather fix the entire list all at once for NSS and NSPR, using the
CVS trunk as the basis.
Assignee | ||
Comment 76•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #75)
> Do you have a list of misspelled words that you're planning to correct but
> have not yet corrected? If so, would you put it in a comment here?
> I'd rather fix the entire list all at once for NSS and NSPR, using the
> CVS trunk as the basis.
see comment 60. Is it easier for you to convert a hg patch to a cvs patch or do you do the patch yourself?
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #441588 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 77•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441571 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441842 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 78•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #441584 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441843 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 79•15 years ago
|
||
This patch was "layout/media v3" before the update, now there is no code from media in there any more.
Attachment #441710 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441844 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Comment 80•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441842 [details] [diff] [review]
dom v3
-* Seperated internal stuff from get() into set()
+* separated internal stuff from get() into set()
You case folded :(
Sorry, but i believe this is the last round of minuses :)
Attachment #441842 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review-
Attachment #441843 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Attachment #441844 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 81•15 years ago
|
||
oh, missed that.
Attachment #441842 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441938 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Attachment #441938 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 82•15 years ago
|
||
Final review. I really hope I didn't screw up doing this patch (at least it applies).
The part from /content/media/ogg/nsOggDecoder.h I corrected has been moved to /content/media/ogg/nsOggPlayStateMachine.h in bug 560708. I have fixed it in the nsOggPlayStateMachine.h file.
For all the fixes please see comment 20.
Attachment #441369 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441370 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441371 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441372 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441383 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441572 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441579 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441582 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441585 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441708 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441843 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441844 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #441938 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #442554 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Comment 83•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 442554 [details] [diff] [review]
final misspellings patch [fixes described in comment 20]
i was hoping you'd fold in the nonexistent collapsing change too, but oh well.
+ this.assertElementsMatch(Selector.matchElements($('fixtures').descendants(), '.inexistent, a.internal'), '#link_1', '#link_2');
should be nonexistent
dom/tests/mochitest/dom-level2-core
this somehow came from something in w3. We should be sending it upstream. konigsberg has some w3 stuff, i'm not sure if it has an index of the right thing for this.
http://mxr-test.konigsberg.mozilla.org/dev-w3/source/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/tests/level2/html/
seems close. Sorry for not spotting it earlier. Can you split the mochitest changes that seem to be w3 derived into its own patch and try to offer it to w3.org? hsivonen should be able to help.
+ // Check that annotation to a not existent page has been removed
an annotation/non-existing
+ // Add a bookmark using a not existent keyword
non-existing
actually for that whole file that's generally the right replacement.
sorry about this. you might as well make the full set of changes here.
i'm stuck reading the whole thing start to finish anyway (and it's my fault, since i should have caught all of this much earlier)
Attachment #442554 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review-
Comment 84•15 years ago
|
||
regarding comment 83,
surely "nonexistent" is preferable to "non-existing", no?
Comment 85•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 441423 [details] [diff] [review]
NSS patch for the alternative priviledge->privilege fix (committed)
Checking in certhigh/certvfy.c; new revision: 1.70; previous revision: 1.69
Checking in cryptohi/keythi.h; new revision: 1.12; previous revision: 1.11
Checking in cryptohi/seckey.c; new revision: 1.53; previous revision: 1.52
Attachment #441423 -
Attachment description: NSS patch for the alternative priviledge->privilege fix → NSS patch for the alternative priviledge->privilege fix (committed)
Comment 86•15 years ago
|
||
In comment 69, Timeless wrote:
> Nelson, could you please change the nit from comment 64 when converting
> to a CVS patch?
That comment (64) was too terse for me. Please tell me
- what file
- old string
- new string
and I'll do it
Assignee | ||
Comment 87•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #83)
> (From update of attachment 442554 [details] [diff] [review])
> i was hoping you'd fold in the nonexistent collapsing change too, but oh well.
>
> +
> this.assertElementsMatch(Selector.matchElements($('fixtures').descendants(),
> '.inexistent, a.internal'), '#link_1', '#link_2');
>
> should be nonexistent
oh, yes. And I will change all non-existent to nonexistent in this patch if they are in a line that is edited anyway. The other cases I'll replace in another patch next week.You wrote in this comment "nonexistent" and "non-existent", which should I use? I'd like to use one in every file and not component-specific.
> dom/tests/mochitest/dom-level2-core
>
> this somehow came from something in w3. We should be sending it upstream.
> konigsberg has some w3 stuff, i'm not sure if it has an index of the right
> thing for this.
>
> http://mxr-test.konigsberg.mozilla.org/dev-w3/source/2001/DOM-Test-Suite/tests/level2/html/
>
> seems close. Sorry for not spotting it earlier. Can you split the mochitest
> changes that seem to be w3 derived into its own patch and try to offer it to
> w3.org? hsivonen should be able to help.
I will check with him and make a new patch on Monday.
Assignee | ||
Comment 88•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #86)
> In comment 69, Timeless wrote:
> > Nelson, could you please change the nit from comment 64 when converting
> > to a CVS patch?
>
> That comment (64) was too terse for me. Please tell me
> - what file
> - old string
> - new string
> and I'll do it
nevermind ;) I thought the "occuring" was in NSPR, but it was in the parser, so it was my assignment. Thanks anyway.
Comment 89•15 years ago
|
||
Comment 90•15 years ago
|
||
philor: Why aren't your changesets part of this bug?
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/a7cbd999c2f5
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/67b93e5e8f5d
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/6ffa228a5897
Perhaps you should coordinate with Michael so you don't bitrot him.
Comment 91•15 years ago
|
||
I don't think we should be messing with the third-party-imported mochitests at all. That includes all of the w3c test suites, the jquery stuff, etc, etc.
Assignee | ||
Comment 92•15 years ago
|
||
* changed to nits from comment 83
* deleted already checked in changes (see comment 90)
* deleted all changes to dom/tests/mochitest/ (see comment 91)
Attachment #442554 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #443704 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 93•15 years ago
|
||
this changes:
* judgement -> judgment
* associtation -> association
* sepcify/sepcifying -> specify/specifying
Attachment #443782 -
Flags: review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 94•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #443783 -
Flags: review?(nelson)
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #443783 -
Flags: review?(nelson) → review+
Comment 95•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 443782 [details] [diff] [review]
misspellings part 2
drop:
toolkit/components/feeds/test/xml/rss1/full_feed_not_bozo.xml
it's based on a real blog, we can't really revise history.
Attachment #443782 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Attachment #443704 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Comment 96•15 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 97•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #443704 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #444690 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 98•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #443782 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #444691 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Whiteboard: [please do not mark this bug as fixed after checkin]
Assignee | ||
Comment 99•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 444690 [details] [diff] [review]
misspellings part 1 [checked in]
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/7ef2a4732afe
Attachment #444690 -
Attachment description: misspellings part 1 [for checking] → misspellings part 1 [checked in]
Assignee | ||
Comment 100•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 444691 [details] [diff] [review]
misspellings part 2 [checked in]
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/11ef0c724251
Attachment #444691 -
Attachment description: misspellings part 2 [for checking] → misspellings part 2 [checked in]
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Whiteboard: [please do not mark this bug as fixed after checkin]
Assignee | ||
Comment 102•15 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 103•14 years ago
|
||
shoud -> should
paltform -> platform
paramter -> parameter
exlude -> exclude
Attachment #452291 -
Flags: review?
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #452291 -
Flags: review? → review?(timeless)
Assignee | ||
Comment 104•14 years ago
|
||
Changes see comment above.
Attachment #452292 -
Flags: review?(nelson)
Attachment #452291 -
Flags: review?(timeless) → review+
Comment 105•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 452291 [details] [diff] [review]
Misspellings Part 3
>+++ b/uriloader/exthandler/win/nsOSHelperAppService.cpp Fri >+// Strip a handler command string of it's quotes and parameters.
s/it's/its/
Assignee | ||
Comment 106•14 years ago
|
||
Corrected: s/it's/its
Also pushed to try server as http://hg.mozilla.org/try/rev/f57476abee09 to be sure I don't break anything with this. BTW, is this try-checkin correct or should I do something different next time? (was my first push)
Attachment #452291 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #456000 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 107•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 456000 [details] [diff] [review]
Misspellings Part 3 v2
sorry, please exclude libvpx. I'm not sure where the upstream is, but i'm sure there is one. you can split out a bug to video/audio and get one of the video/audio people to deal w/ it, or find the upstream directly.
Attachment #456000 -
Flags: review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 108•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #107)
> (From update of attachment 456000 [details] [diff] [review])
> sorry, please exclude libvpx. I'm not sure where the upstream is, but i'm sure
> there is one. you can split out a bug to video/audio and get one of the
> video/audio people to deal w/ it, or find the upstream directly.
As far as I see the upstream lives at http://www.webmproject.org/code/ . Filed a bug there with the patch attached.
Attachment #456000 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #456267 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Alias: spelling
Assignee | ||
Comment 109•14 years ago
|
||
Please report new misspellings in bug 577266 . If they are only in nspr or nss present, please report them to bug 577267 or bug 577268. Thanks.
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #452292 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #452292 -
Flags: review?(nelson)
Assignee | ||
Comment 110•14 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 111•14 years ago
|
||
libvpx fixed: http://review.webmproject.org/#change,316
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•