Closed
Bug 510062
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
buildbot masters should prioritize stable branches above projects branches
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect, P2)
Release Engineering
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: bhearsum, Assigned: coop)
References
Details
(Keywords: student-project, Whiteboard: [buildmasters][automation][simple][oldbugs])
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
1.75 KB,
patch
|
catlee
:
review+
coop
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
...but still prioritize all release work above everything else. So, that means: releases > mozilla-{central,1.9.1,1.9.2} > tracemonkey,places,electrolysis
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Futuring as an enhancement.
Component: Release Engineering → Release Engineering: Future
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•14 years ago
|
||
Mass move of bugs from Release Engineering:Future -> Release Engineering. See http://coop.deadsquid.com/2010/02/kiss-the-future-goodbye/ for more details.
Component: Release Engineering: Future → Release Engineering
Priority: -- → P3
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [buildmasters][automation]
Updated•14 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → armenzg
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: P3 → P4
Updated•14 years ago
|
Keywords: student-project
Whiteboard: [buildmasters][automation] → [buildmasters][automation][simple]
Updated•14 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [buildmasters][automation][simple] → [buildmasters][automation][simple][oldbugs]
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Assignee: armenzg → coop
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
OS: Mac OS X → All
Priority: P4 → P3
Hardware: x86 → All
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: P3 → P2
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
catlee just touched this code today, so he wins the review request.
Attachment #495932 -
Flags: review?(catlee)
Comment 5•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 495932 [details] [diff] [review] Prioritize m-c, 1.9.2, and 1.9.2 ahead of other branches config.py is reloaded after master_common in builder_master.cfg, so changes to PRIORITY_BRANCHES wouldn't take effect at the first reconfig. Also, the mozilla-tests/ masters also use master_common.py, so config.py (or wherever the list ends up) will have to be updated there as well.
Attachment #495932 -
Flags: review?(catlee) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5) > config.py is reloaded after master_common in builder_master.cfg, so changes to > PRIORITY_BRANCHES wouldn't take effect at the first reconfig. What's the recommended way to make this reconfig-safe then? Move PRIORITY_BRANCHES into master_common?
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•14 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 496798 [details] [diff] [review] Prioritize m-c, 1.9.2, and 1.9.2 ahead of other branches, v2 Moves the PRIORITY_BRANCHES list into master_common to facilitate reconfigs, as discussed in IRC.
Attachment #496798 -
Attachment is patch: true
Attachment #496798 -
Attachment mime type: application/octet-stream → text/plain
Attachment #496798 -
Flags: review?(catlee)
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Attachment #495932 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 9•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 496798 [details] [diff] [review] Prioritize m-c, 1.9.2, and 1.9.2 ahead of other branches, v2 I think instead of "and builder.properties['branch']" we should be doing "and 'branch' in builder.properties", or whatever the properties equivalent is. The code as it is risks raising a KeyError of the builder doesn't have 'branch'. r+ with that change.
Attachment #496798 -
Flags: review?(catlee) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #9) > I think instead of "and builder.properties['branch']" we should be doing "and > 'branch' in builder.properties", or whatever the properties equivalent is. The > code as it is risks raising a KeyError of the builder doesn't have 'branch'. builder.properties.has_key('branch') is what we want here. Fixed.
Flags: needs-reconfig?
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 496798 [details] [diff] [review] Prioritize m-c, 1.9.2, and 1.9.2 ahead of other branches, v2 Landed so it run in preproduction: http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/2947e16e6502
Attachment #496798 -
Flags: checked-in+
Comment 12•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 495932 [details] [diff] [review] Prioritize m-c, 1.9.2, and 1.9.2 ahead of other branches i just want all these bugs out of my computer. please help!!!
Comment 13•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 495932 [details] [diff] [review] Prioritize m-c, 1.9.2, and 1.9.2 ahead of other branches i just want all these bugs out of my computer. please help!!! and how can i write in here before if this is my first time ever being here?? i would even be here if my computer wasn't **** up!! so please help me fix all the bugs on my computer. PLEASE
Comment 14•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > I think instead of "and builder.properties['branch']" we should be doing "and > > 'branch' in builder.properties", or whatever the properties equivalent is. The > > code as it is risks raising a KeyError of the builder doesn't have 'branch'. > > builder.properties.has_key('branch') is what we want here. Fixed. HOW CAN I COMMENT ON SOMETHING IF I WAS NEVER HERE BEFORE!!!!!!!!!
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•14 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #14) > HOW CAN I COMMENT ON SOMETHING IF I WAS NEVER HERE BEFORE!!!!!!!!! Please stop. If you need help with Mozilla products, please start here: http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/home/
Reporter | ||
Comment 16•14 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 496798 [details] [diff] [review] Prioritize m-c, 1.9.2, and 1.9.2 ahead of other branches, v2 Landed on production branch
Assignee | ||
Updated•14 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•