516946 - Image 10 new mac minis for production build/unittest pool

Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE

(mozilla.org Graveyard :: Server Operations, task)

Description

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

they should be:
moz2-darwin9-slave19
moz2-darwin9-slave20
moz2-darwin9-slave21
moz2-darwin9-slave22
moz2-darwin9-slave23
moz2-darwin9-slave24
moz2-darwin9-slave25
moz2-darwin9-slave26
moz2-darwin9-slave27
moz2-darwin9-slave28

Comment 1

[Phong Tran [:phong]]

We don't have 10 spare mac minis for this.  We also have to find a spot for them once we find the spare minis.

Comment 2

[Justin Fitzhugh]

how are we blocked on hardware?  we reclaimed 13 from the office, shouldn't that get this going?

Comment 3

[Phong Tran [:phong]]

Those are accounted and used already.
bug 524911
bug 524843

Comment 4

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

(In reply to comment #3)
> Those are accounted and used already.
> bug 524911
> bug 524843

From a quick scan of the pile of returned 1.83ghz minis last night, there's still 11 returned and waiting to be reimaged. And more coming back today. I'll file separate bug to image those as Talos machines, because they are Talos-grade machines.

For this bug, we're going to try using 10 of the newer spec minis as builders, and compare with the xserve-with-parallels experiment. Dep.bugs adjusted.

Comment 5

[Phong Tran [:phong]]

I don't see any minis.

Comment 6

[[e-mail] (:bhearsum)]

(In reply to comment #5)
> I don't see any minis.

Per bug 527764, they're still on order.

Also, please don't use the names in comment #0 anymore, use the following instead:
moz2-fast-darwin9-slave01-10.

Comment 7

[Phong Tran [:phong]]

Do we still need this or will we move to new hardware for these?

Comment 8

[matthew zeier [:mrz]]

Let's close this and re-open when you know what you want to do.