Closed
Bug 520226
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
the try server web interface should be implemented through push-to-try
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: bhearsum, Assigned: lsblakk)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [tryserver])
Currently the web interface is processed by processchanges.pl, which sends them on to the master with 'buildbot sendchange'. We'd have a much more maintainable try server if we had it send them through push-to-try. This would let us only have _one_ code path to maintain on the try server.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → lsblakk
Comment 1•16 years ago
|
||
I guess fixing this bug will allow changes from the web interface to show up on http://tests.themasta.com/tinderboxpushlog/?tree=MozillaTry.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•16 years ago
|
||
Yup, it certainly will
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Mass move of bugs from Release Engineering:Future -> Release Engineering. See http://coop.deadsquid.com/2010/02/kiss-the-future-goodbye/ for more details.
Component: Release Engineering: Future → Release Engineering
Priority: -- → P3
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
We're going to rollout try-as-branch with only push to try and no web interface. At a later date there might be a web interface that works with schedulerDB but until that time, we will not have a web UI for try. John O'Duinn checked on the current usage of the try web interface and found that it had not been used once in the past month.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
The web interface is far from unused. Each .info file here represents one use of it:
https://build.mozilla.org/patches/
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
Reopening to gather further data as I was mistakenly lead to believe there was no activity when there actually is. Will continue to rollout try without web UI at first, though.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WONTFIX → ---
| Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Summary: the try server web interface should by implemented through push-to-try → the try server web interface should be implemented through push-to-try
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
There was some confusion in #developers about the status of the web interface. I modified the page to indicate that it does not work right now.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [tryserver]
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
this doesn't actually block the implementation of try as a branch in config.
No longer blocks: 520227
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
We're assuming this fix will deal with binary patches; could you add one to the list of tests to run in staging (when there's a patch for this)? Bug 509122
| Assignee | ||
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
Try-as-branch has been rolled out, try enhancements to how try actually works
now are being tracked in bug 572808. This bug is so far out of date that I am
closing it and once we have (if we return to) a web interface we will design its integration with push-to-try accordingly, further bugs on its
design can be filed as needed.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago → 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Is there a bug about bringing back non-mozilla-central (branch) support for try (via push-to-try now, since that seems to be the only supported interface any more) that I haven't seen?
One of the things I found very useful about the web interface was the ability to try on branches (to check patches there, given the increasing differences from m-c) vs. only being able to try against mozilla-central. :-(
| Assignee | ||
Comment 14•15 years ago
|
||
The closest bug to what you mention would be bug 563822 where we are continuing the discussion of how to handle other non m-c pushes to try. Can't say how soon that will be actively worked on, but feel free to comment in that bug as to your usage and prefs. Cheers.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•