Same on trunk and 2.0 branch:
Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/chrome/chatzilla.jar (packages, 491).
Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/chrome.manifest (packages, 492).
Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/install.js (packages, 493).
Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/install.rdf (packages, 494).
I don't know much about l10n. KaiRo?
Thos are intentional, as we want to be able to package localized builds, and langpack-@ab-CD@/ exists there.
Is/Could there an 'ifdef' or something we could use?
(In reply to comment #2)
> Is/Could there an 'ifdef' or something we could use?
Not an ifdef by itself, possibly some convoluted construct defining something in a Makefile which then can be used by an ifdef there, but I don't think it's worht that for fighting the non-issue of such a package warning.
Bug 521523 landing removed the following lines too:
V.Fixed, per tinderboxes.
yes, I intentionally added an ifdef for that, to make you feel better ;-)
Oh, great :-)