Closed
Bug 524030
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Fix 4 "Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org /*"
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Build Config, defect)
SeaMonkey
Build Config
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
seamonkey2.1a1
People
(Reporter: sgautherie, Assigned: kairo)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: [fixed by bug 521523])
Same on trunk and 2.0 branch:
{
[chatzilla]
bin/extensions/{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}/components/chatzilla-service.js
bin/extensions/{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}/chrome/chatzilla.jar
bin/extensions/{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}/chrome/icons/default/chatzilla-window.ico
bin/extensions/{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}/chrome.manifest
bin/extensions/{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}/install.rdf
Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/chrome/chatzilla.jar (packages, 491).
Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/chrome.manifest (packages, 492).
Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/install.js (packages, 493).
Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/install.rdf (packages, 494).
}
I don't know much about l10n. KaiRo?
Flags: in-testsuite-
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Hardware: x86 → All
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
Thos are intentional, as we want to be able to package localized builds, and langpack-@ab-CD@/ exists there.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Is/Could there an 'ifdef' or something we could use?
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
> Is/Could there an 'ifdef' or something we could use?
Not an ifdef by itself, possibly some convoluted construct defining something in a Makefile which then can be used by an ifdef there, but I don't think it's worht that for fighting the non-issue of such a package warning.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Bug 521523 landing removed the following lines too:
{
make package-compare
-bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/chrome.manifest
-bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/chrome/chatzilla.jar
-bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/install.js
-bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/install.rdf
}
Assignee: nobody → kairo
Severity: normal → trivial
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Depends on: 521523
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [fixed by bug 521523]
Target Milestone: --- → seamonkey2.1a1
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
yes, I intentionally added an ifdef for that, to make you feel better ;-)
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•