The default bug view has changed. See this FAQ.

Fix 4 "Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/*"

VERIFIED FIXED in seamonkey2.1a1

Status

SeaMonkey
Build Config
--
trivial
VERIFIED FIXED
8 years ago
7 years ago

People

(Reporter: sgautherie, Assigned: Robert Kaiser)

Tracking

Trunk
seamonkey2.1a1
Dependency tree / graph
Bug Flags:
in-testsuite -

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

(Whiteboard: [fixed by bug 521523], URL)

(Reporter)

Description

8 years ago
Same on trunk and 2.0 branch:

{
[chatzilla]
bin/extensions/{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}/components/chatzilla-service.js
bin/extensions/{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}/chrome/chatzilla.jar
bin/extensions/{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}/chrome/icons/default/chatzilla-window.ico
bin/extensions/{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}/chrome.manifest
bin/extensions/{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}/install.rdf
Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/chrome/chatzilla.jar (packages, 491).
Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/chrome.manifest (packages, 492).
Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/install.js (packages, 493).
Warning: package error or possible missing or unnecessary file: bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/install.rdf (packages, 494).
}

I don't know much about l10n. KaiRo?
Flags: in-testsuite-
(Reporter)

Updated

8 years ago
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Hardware: x86 → All
(Assignee)

Comment 1

8 years ago
Thos are intentional, as we want to be able to package localized builds, and langpack-@ab-CD@/ exists there.
(Reporter)

Comment 2

8 years ago
Is/Could there an 'ifdef' or something we could use?
(Assignee)

Comment 3

8 years ago
(In reply to comment #2)
> Is/Could there an 'ifdef' or something we could use?

Not an ifdef by itself, possibly some convoluted construct defining something in a Makefile which then can be used by an ifdef there, but I don't think it's worht that for fighting the non-issue of such a package warning.
(Reporter)

Comment 4

7 years ago
Bug 521523 landing removed the following lines too:
{
make package-compare

-bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/chrome.manifest
-bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/chrome/chatzilla.jar
-bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/install.js
-bin/extensions/langpack-en-US@chatzilla.mozilla.org/install.rdf
}
Assignee: nobody → kairo
Severity: normal → trivial
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 7 years ago
Depends on: 521523
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [fixed by bug 521523]
Target Milestone: --- → seamonkey2.1a1
(Reporter)

Comment 5

7 years ago
V.Fixed, per tinderboxes.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
(Assignee)

Comment 6

7 years ago
yes, I intentionally added an ifdef for that, to make you feel better ;-)
(Reporter)

Comment 7

7 years ago
Oh, great :-)
http://mxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/search?string=LOCALE_BUILD&case=1&find=%2Fsuite%2Finstaller%2F
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.