526424 - Vertical scrollbar disappears with long mail header name.

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 526918

(Thunderbird :: Message Reader UI, defect)

Description

[A. Shimono [:himorin]]

Attachment: screen shot

I think we might already have a bug like this, but i could not find.

View an attachment for details.
* Vertical scrollbar disappears when long mail header name such as 'content-transfer-encoding' are displaied.
* Can view vertical scrollbar when such header name isn't listed.
* enlarging the window (to the max of XGA) doesn't solve this

Comment 1

[Ludovic Hirlimann [:Usul]]

Hello Himorin,

What version of thunderbird are you seeing this on ?

Comment 2

[A. Shimono [:himorin]]

(In reply to comment #1)
> Hello Himorin,
> 
> What version of thunderbird are you seeing this on ?

Ah, forgot it. sorry.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; ja; rv:1.9.1.6pre) Gecko/20091103 Shredder/3.0pre

Comment 3

[Dan Mosedale (:dmosedale, :dmose)]

Looking at that screenshot, I see an "other actions" dropdown, which makes me suspect it's displaying all the headers it needs to.  Am I correctly understanding that you expect to see more headers below content-transfer-encoding and a vertical scrollbar for the message header area?  If so, which headers are you expecting to see?

Comment 4

[A. Shimono [:himorin]]

Attachment: screenshot 2

(In reply to comment #3)
> Looking at that screenshot, I see an "other actions" dropdown, which makes me
> suspect it's displaying all the headers it needs to.  Am I correctly
> understanding that you expect to see more headers below
> content-transfer-encoding and a vertical scrollbar for the message header area?
>  If so, which headers are you expecting to see?

No, the problem is that I cannot use 'scrollbar' at the right side.
Hrm. I think I should attach like this rather than the privious one.

Comment 5

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

A.A. do you still see this?
I think it should be gone.
perhaps a dup of bug 526918

Comment 6

[A. Shimono [:himorin]]

(In reply to comment #5)
> A.A. do you still see this?
> I think it should be gone.
> perhaps a dup of bug 526918

Ah, no.
Not see this on 3.2a1pre/20100124, 3.2a1pre/20100217, nor 3.0.2pre/20100216.

I think its a dup of bug 526918, as you said.