Closed Bug 534565 Opened 15 years ago Closed 15 years ago

Port |Bug 499417 - Refactor login manager's crypto code| to SeaMonkey

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Build Config, defect)

defect
Not set
major

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED FIXED
seamonkey2.1a1

People

(Reporter: sgautherie, Assigned: sgautherie)

References

Details

(Keywords: fixed-seamonkey2.0.3)

Attachments

(2 files)

No description provided.
Flags: in-testsuite-
Attachment #417420 - Flags: approval-seamonkey2.0.2?
I don't know why you're touching 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 code, bug 499417 isn't going to land there.
(In reply to comment #3) To "support downgrading": "better safe than sorry."
I don't see what that's needed or even a good idea. But hey, it's your product, knock yourself out.
Dolske, as far as I remember, the Firefox removed-files was changed in similar ways to allow downgrading from one release to another. If that wouldn't have happened, I'd not allow such patches in SeaMonkey either, as that file is already too hard to read in any case (and it probably will still get worse over time) :(
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.3a1pre) Gecko/20091214 SeaMonkey/2.1a1pre] (nightly) (W2Ksp4) { Failed to load XPCOM component: ...\components\crypto-SDR.js } And saved passwords list is empty, etc :-(
Severity: trivial → major
Blocks: 534589
Attachment #417419 - Flags: review?(kairo) → review+
Attachment #417420 - Flags: approval-seamonkey2.0.2? → approval-seamonkey2.0.2+
Attachment #417419 - Attachment description: (Av1) Fix m-c and m-1.9.2 → (Av1) Fix m-c and m-1.9.2 [Checkin: Comment 8]
Attachment #417420 - Attachment description: (Bv1-191) Support downgrading → (Bv1-191) Support downgrading [Checkin: Comment 9]
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.3a1pre) Gecko/20091215 SeaMonkey/2.1a1pre] (nightly, 2009-12-15-10) (W2Ksp4) V.Fixed.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
(In reply to comment #10) > SeaMonkey/2.1a1pre] (nightly, 2009-12-15-10) (W2Ksp4) > > V.Fixed. Looks like its not fixed in trunk-builds yet.
(In reply to comment #11) > Looks like its not fixed in trunk-builds yet. Which builds specifically? (Which steps?)
(In reply to comment #11) > Looks like its not fixed in trunk-builds yet. It is fixed in my private builds on Linux. You are using Windows NT 6.0; de-DE and i am not sure, if this is a clobber build.
(In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > Looks like its not fixed in trunk-builds yet. > > Which builds specifically? (Which steps?) ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/comm-central-trunk-win32/ From platform.ini: [Build] BuildID=20091216022627 Milestone=1.9.3a1pre SourceStamp=f8d2c6f4631d SourceRepository=http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central
(In reply to comment #14) > ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/tinderbox-builds/comm-central-trunk-win32/ [Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.3a1pre) Gecko/20091216 SeaMonkey/2.1a1pre] (comm-central-trunk-win32/1260970429) (W2Ksp4) > From platform.ini: > BuildID=20091216022627 > SourceStamp=f8d2c6f4631d > SourceRepository=http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central application.ini: BuildID=20091216053349 SourceRepository=http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central SourceStamp=d25bb34f4cce Well, you're right that the P.M. list is empty, but I don't see this bug error in the console: ftb, I can only assume that this is a side-effect of one of the multiple other packaging errors our 2.1 "hourlies" still have. NB: Don't file bugs about these errors, I'm working on fixing packaging...
(In reply to comment #15) > Well, you're right that the P.M. list is empty, > but I don't see this bug error in the console: Do you look for this? http://lahls.de/temp/pic/errorconsole.png (112KB) You may pay attentions for the first line! > ftb, I can only assume that this is a side-effect of one of the multiple other > packaging errors our 2.1 "hourlies" still have. ACK. > NB: Don't file bugs about these errors, I'm working on fixing packaging... Sorry, I thought, the packaging was already fixed.
(In reply to comment #16) > http://lahls.de/temp/pic/errorconsole.png (112KB) You may pay attentions for > the first line! This nsSuiteGlue.js error comes after the packaging errors on first profile use, then it comes alone (on my local Windows). That's why (or anyway) I think it's better to fix the latters before looking into the former. I have no idea why you still get crypto-SDR.js error(s). > > NB: Don't file bugs about these errors, I'm working on fixing packaging... > > Sorry, I thought, the packaging was already fixed. Your report(s) is appreciated. But "hourlies" are meant for developer use "only" and maybe you shouldn't bother with them (atm).
(In reply to comment #17) > it's better to fix the latters before looking into the former. Now I've filed bug 535462.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: