535231 - Port |Bug 513783 - Land js-ctypes on trunk and 1.9.2| to SeaMonkey

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(SeaMonkey :: Build Config, defect)

Description

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

[Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.3a1pre) Gecko/20091216 SeaMonkey/2.1a1pre] (comm-central-trunk-win32/1260970429) (W2Ksp4)
{
Failed to load XPCOM component: ...\components\jsctypes.dll
}

I'll fix the packaging part immediately.
I'll leave the "configure.in" part(s) for later, as we don't really care for them (atm).

Comment 1

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Attachment: (Av1) Fix m-1.9.2+, packaging part only [Checkin: Comment 3]

Comment 2

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Attachment: (Bv1-191) Support downgrading [Checkin: Comment 4]

Comment 3

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Comment on attachment 417938 [details] [diff] [review]
(Av1) Fix m-1.9.2+, packaging part only
[Checkin: Comment 3]


http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/59a4f0081fe2

Comment 4

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Comment on attachment 417939 [details] [diff] [review]
(Bv1-191) Support downgrading
[Checkin: Comment 4]


http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-1.9.1/rev/21bf46738f83

Comment 5

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

(In reply to comment #3)
> (From update of attachment 417938 [details] [diff] [review])
> 
> http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/59a4f0081fe2

This part is V.Fixed, per tinderbox.

Comment 6

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

(In reply to comment #0)
> I'll leave the "configure.in" part(s) for later, as we don't really care for
> them (atm).

Afaict, the "only" relevant part would be the first block of
http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-1.9.2/diff/8dcb04076a94/configure.in
of which we can notice
{
    1.11 +if test "$OS_TEST" != "arm"; then
    1.12 +  BUILD_CTYPES=1
}

Mark, Robert,
am I right to assume that c-c apps are not targeting "arm"?
(So we wouldn't need to port any configure part.)

Comment 7

[Robert Kaiser]

(In reply to comment #6)
> Mark, Robert,
> am I right to assume that c-c apps are not targeting "arm"?
> (So we wouldn't need to port any configure part.)

If possible, we should not explicitely un-support it, as Thundebird may very well want to work on a version for netbooks and maybe even smaller devices that often run with arm processors.
And I as well as others might still like to be able to build SeaMonkey e.g. for the N810, even if its UI doesn't fit well.

Comment 8

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Attachment: (Cv1) Port configure part (= 3 Core bugs), Update SeaMonkey packaging [Checkin: Comment 10]

Per comment 7.

Comment 9

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Attachment: (Dv1-TB) Update Thunderbird packaging [Checkin: Comment 11]

NB: TB team can check (and fix if need be) their (lack of) removed-files.in handling in another bug...

Comment 10

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Comment on attachment 423537 [details] [diff] [review]
(Cv1) Port configure part (= 3 Core bugs), Update SeaMonkey packaging
[Checkin: Comment 10]


http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/4e92978d386a

Comment 11

[Serge Gautherie (:sgautherie)]

Comment on attachment 423543 [details] [diff] [review]
(Dv1-TB) Update Thunderbird packaging
[Checkin: Comment 11]


http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/701e06745f44