Closed
Bug 538810
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
When in Offline mode Reply To buttons either do not appear or do not work
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Message Reader UI, defect)
Tracking
(thunderbird3.0 .2-fixed)
VERIFIED
FIXED
Thunderbird 3.1b1
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
thunderbird3.0 | --- | .2-fixed |
People
(Reporter: david, Assigned: Bienvenu)
References
Details
Attachments
(3 files)
307.36 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
808 bytes,
patch
|
neil
:
review+
neil
:
superreview+
standard8
:
approval-thunderbird3.0.2+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
4.04 KB,
application/x-javascript
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20091221 Firefox/3.5.7
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0
When working in Offline mode Reply To buttons either do not work or do not appear. The only way to send a message is to right click on it and select reply to from the context menu that appears.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go into Offline Mode
2. Select a message
3. Look at either the menu bar above the message, the "reply to" button is not there.
3b. if you have chose to display the "reply to" in the general menu bar it is grayed out.
Actual Results:
Could not select "reply to"
Expected Results:
Should be able to respond to messages when offline and then be able to "send later" after composing.
Updated•15 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
This WFM on Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1. Humph, what version were you using when you confirmed ? Could this be 10.6 only ?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
It looks to me like reply is disabled on junk messages.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
The screen shot is of junk mail as I didn't want to show personal email. The same thing occurs with all mail I have.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
weird, it only happened to me with junk mail.
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
> confirmed ? Could this be 10.6 only ?
I saw it in 10.6.2, yes. So perhaps it's version specific, not sure. Untested elsewhere.
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
CONFIRMED on OSX 10.6.2 with Tb 3.0.1, buttons disappear in non-JUNK folders too, and come right back as soon as I go back online. This is with IMAP hitting Exchange 2003. I have "Keep messages for this account on this computer" turned OFF in Account Setup if that makes a difference.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
reply is disabled if we don't have the contents of the message stored offline - do you have the messages store for offline use?
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
I can fully see the message as well as the TO/FROM fields, but REPLY button is gone.
All of the TO/FROM information shows up just fine. I do NOT have the Account Option "Keep messages for this account on this computer" turned on though, though I did click the "Download" when I switched to "Offline" mode.
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
I tried checking "Keep messages for this account on this computer" and it didn't change anything. Reply buttons still do not appear.
Updated•15 years ago
|
Flags: blocking-thunderbird3.1?
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
I did run into an instance of this - if you're in a saved search/smart folder, and the message is in a local folder, when offline, reply won't be enabled. I need to add a mozmill test for this.
Assignee: nobody → bienvenu
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
sid0, thoughts about where to add this? I could add it to the test-smart-folder test (though it's really about cross-folder virtual folders in general); I could add it to test-message-commands, but then I'd need to make that test use smart folders (which I probably should do in general because we have a lot of smart folder-specific command handling issues). Or I could add a new test, e.g., test-smart-folder-commands.js
Comment 13•15 years ago
|
||
test-smart-folder-commands.js sounds good. In general I think it's a good idea to have lots of smaller test files, because they're generally easier to debug.
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 423557 [details] [diff] [review]
fix for local mail in smart folders/saved search
I wasted most of the day writing a mozmill test for this only to discover that mozmill doesn't work if the ioservice is offline.
Attachment #423557 -
Flags: superreview?(neil)
Attachment #423557 -
Flags: review?(neil)
Comment 15•15 years ago
|
||
That kinda sounds like a bug in MozMill to me. Clint, are you aware of this and/or any sort of fix/workaround on the horizon?
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•15 years ago
|
||
I've already e-mailed Clint privately to ask about this.
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•15 years ago
|
||
this is a simplified version of the test that doesn't work because offline is turned on.
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #423557 -
Flags: superreview?(neil)
Attachment #423557 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #423557 -
Flags: review?(neil)
Attachment #423557 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•15 years ago
|
||
fixed on trunk.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 423557 [details] [diff] [review]
fix for local mail in smart folders/saved search
nice simple fix for 3.02
Attachment #423557 -
Flags: approval-thunderbird3.0.2?
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #423557 -
Flags: approval-thunderbird3.0.2? → approval-thunderbird3.0.2+
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•15 years ago
|
||
fixed for 3.02 as well.
status-thunderbird3.0:
--- → .2-fixed
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 3.1b1
Updated•15 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Keywords: verified-thunderbird3.0
Updated•15 years ago
|
Flags: blocking-thunderbird3.1?
Reporter | ||
Comment 21•14 years ago
|
||
Just wanted to say thank you to everyone who worked on this bug. Great learning process for me.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•