Closed
Bug 546547
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
HG Account Request -Andreas Nilsson <nisses.mail@home.se >
Categories
(mozilla.org :: Repository Account Requests, task)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: andreasn, Assigned: jlaz)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
736 bytes,
application/octet-stream
|
Details |
I would like to have an account created if I don't currently have one. Mostly in order to push changes to the ongoing addons experiments for Thunderbird.
See also bug 488575
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Commit_Policy:Current_Procedures#Hg_.28hg.mozilla.org.29 has the requirements for HG access.
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Which, translated, says "our policy does not match our wishes or needs, and the only way you can get access to user repos is by getting access to comm-central."
vouch.
form is on file per bug 488575.
Whiteboard: form, voucher1
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
All right, I'll ask for access to comm-central as well. Might as well start pushing my own patches.
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Commit_Access_Policy#Level_3_-_Core_Product_Access indicates: Vouch: 2 module owners/peers, plus 1 super-reviewer will be what is needed.
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
re comment 2: see github.com and bitbucket.org. We should have something like that at mozilla.org for extension authors. In the meantime, extension authors could use bitbucket.org.
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
or mozdev, of course (silly me!)
Sorry, probably not relevant to this bug anyways.
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Mmm, if we're citing Commit_Access_Policy, does that mean that we now *do* have the Level 1 access that is actually what Andreas wanted to request?
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
Y, see Bug 548096
(In reply to comment #7)
> Mmm, if we're citing Commit_Access_Policy, does that mean that we now *do* have
> the Level 1 access that is actually what Andreas wanted to request?
Component: Account Request: Hg → Repository Account Requests
QA Contact: hg-acct-req → repo-acct-req
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
I'll vouch for Andreas as well.
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: form, voucher1 → form, voucher1,voucher2
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
So this is for level 1? Looks like it's ready to go, then.
Over to server-ops for the hg/scm_level_1 bitflips.
Assignee: marcia → server-ops
Whiteboard: form, voucher1,voucher2
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Assignee: server-ops → jlazaro
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
hg and scm_level_1 bits enabled for nisses.mail@home.se
-jlazaro
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•