547466 - Release Notes for Bugzilla 3.6rc1

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Bugzilla :: Documentation, defect)

Comment 1

[Max Kanat-Alexander]

Attachment: Work In Progress

Comment 2

[Reed Loden [:reed]]

Comment on attachment 428264 [details] [diff] [review]
Work In Progress

+  <li>The <kbd>loginnetmask</kbd> parameter has been removed. Since
+    [% terms.Bugzilal %] sends secure cookies, it's no longer necessary
+    to always restrict logins to a specific IP or block of addresses.</li>

s/Bugzilal/Bugzilla/

+  <li>The <kbd>quicksearch_comment_cutoff</kbd> parameter is gone.
+    Quicksearch now always searches comments, but uses a much faster
+    algorithm to do it.</li>

Comma-splice.

Comment 3

[Max Kanat-Alexander]

Attachment: WIP 2

Thanks for the feedback reed. :-) I fixed both of the things you pointed out in this one (in addition to adding more stuff).

Comment 4

[Reed Loden [:reed]]

Comment on attachment 428279 [details] [diff] [review]
WIP 2

>+  <li><b>Attachments:</b> There is now a link back to the [% terms.bug %]
>+    at the bottom of the "Details" page for an attachment.</li>
>+  <li><b>Attachments:</b> There is now a link back to the [% terms.bug %]
>+    at the bottom of the "Details" page for an attachment.</li>

The Department of Redundancy Department called. It wants its sentence back. ;)

Comment 5

[Max Kanat-Alexander]

Attachment: WIP 3

Comment 6

[Max Kanat-Alexander]

Attachment: v1

Okay, this is complete and passes runtests.

Comment 7

[Deepnarayan Choubey]

Happy day all ,  Thanks for reply.

Comment 8

[Matt Rogers]

Shouldn't the attribution for Lambda Research be with the attributions for the other companies that funded Bugzilla work?

Otherwise, seems fine to me.

Comment 9

[Max Kanat-Alexander]

(In reply to comment #8)
> Shouldn't the attribution for Lambda Research be with the attributions for the
> other companies that funded Bugzilla work?

  In this particular case, since their contribution was so focused, I decided to list them in the feature itself.

Comment 10

[Max Kanat-Alexander]

Attachment: v2

Added a credit for Red Hat.

Comment 11

[Frédéric Buclin]

Comment on attachment 428823 [details] [diff] [review]
v2

>+  [% terms.Bugzilla %], but the results of the research have already

Please also fixes such lines which start with "  [% terms.* %]". I see 5 occurences. Should be [%+

Comment 12

[Max Kanat-Alexander]

Attachment: v3

I used a regex to fix all the lines like that, which included some old relnotes. I'll probably go back and fix those on the stable branches as well, without a bug filed, since I have the regex command line to do it now.

Comment 13

[Max Kanat-Alexander]

Attachment: v4

Okay, I actually just went ahead and fixed the old release notes on all the branches for the "[% terms" stuff, so this patch now only contains the current release notes.

Comment 14

[Deepnarayan Choubey]

Happy day sir!  What is Release Notes for Bugzilla 3.6rc1?  Thanks.

Comment 15

[Gervase Markham [:gerv]]

Comment on attachment 428828 [details] [diff] [review]
v4

Priorify -> Priority.

Otherwise, looks good :-)

Gerv

Comment 16

[Reed Loden [:reed]]

Bug 108243, comment #35 needs to be added to the relnotes.

Comment 17

[Frédéric Buclin]

Comment on attachment 428828 [details] [diff] [review]
v4


>-<ul>
>-  <li><a href="#v34_req_perl">Perl</a></li>
>-  <li><a href="#v34_req_mysql">For MySQL Users</a></li>
>-  <li><a href="#v34_req_pg">For PostgreSQL Users</a></li>
>-  <li><a href="#v34_req_oracle">For Oracle Users</a></li>
>-  <li><a href="#v34_req_modules">Required Perl Modules</a></li>
>-  <li><a href="#v34_req_optional_mod">Optional Perl Modules</a></li>
>-</ul>
>-
>-<h3 id="v34_req_perl">Perl</h3>
>-
>+<ul> 
>+  <li><a href="#v34_req_perl">Perl</a></li> 
>+  <li><a href="#v34_req_mysql">For MySQL Users</a></li> 
>+  <li><a href="#v34_req_pg">For PostgreSQL Users</a></li> 
>+  <li><a href="#v34_req_oracle">For Oracle Users</a></li> 
>+  <li><a href="#v34_req_modules">Required Perl Modules</a></li> 
>+  <li><a href="#v34_req_optional_mod">Optional Perl Modules</a></li> 
>+</ul> 

Please revert these changes. These lines do not need an extra whitespace at the end.

Otherwise looks good (I didn't check all links, nor did I check that every new feature or bug fix is indeed new to 3.6). r=LpSolit

Comment 18

[Frédéric Buclin]

Comment on attachment 428828 [details] [diff] [review]
v4

>+  <li><a href="#v36_req">Minimum Requirements</a></li>

I just found that this link points to nowhere. Please fix that on checkin.

Comment 19

[Max Kanat-Alexander]

  Thanks for all the feedback, everybody!

Committing to: bzr+ssh://bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/trunk/                       
modified Bugzilla/Template.pm
modified template/en/default/pages/release-notes.html.tmpl
Committed revision 7037.      

Committing to: bzr+ssh://bzr.mozilla.org/bugzilla/3.6/                         
modified Bugzilla/Template.pm
modified template/en/default/pages/release-notes.html.tmpl
Committed revision 7008.

Comment 20

[Max Kanat-Alexander]

Attachment: Checked-In Version

On checkin, thanks to LpSolit's comments, I noticed that I had accidentally added back-in some <a name> tags, and I also fixed up the problem that LpSolit pointed out (which was actually that there was no <h2> or Table of Contents for a Minimum Requirements section for 3.6!).