Closed
Bug 548605
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
[tracking bug] release automation needs to support Linux x86_64 builds
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: bhearsum, Assigned: rail)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [automation][linux64][3.7alpha])
Attachments
(2 files, 2 obsolete files)
9.38 KB,
patch
|
bhearsum
:
review-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.03 KB,
patch
|
bhearsum
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We need to run through the automation with x86_64 release builds enabled and see what issues we hit, and fix them.
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Blocks: support-L64
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
I will try to give a stab at this next week. Time permitting.
Assignee: nobody → armenzg
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: P5 → P2
Updated•15 years ago
|
OS: Mac OS X → Linux
Updated•15 years ago
|
Priority: P2 → P3
Updated•15 years ago
|
Priority: P3 → P2
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Just posting for reference.
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
In http://staging-stage.build.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/3.6.2-candidates/build3/
we can find the following:
* en-US.xpi
* linux-x86_64/en-US/
** namoroka-3.6.2.tar.bz2
** namoroka-3.6.2.txt (20100317140027 cd857b3b0e33)
* linux64_info.txt (buildID=20100317140027)
* update/linux-x86_64/en-US/
** namoroka-3.6.2.complete.mar
I will look into fixing the naming and try to trigger following builders.
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
>
> I will look into fixing the naming and try to trigger following builders.
Modified these to the release mozconfigs:
-ac_add_options --disable-tests
-ac_add_options --with-branding=browser/branding/unofficial
+ac_add_options --enable-tests
+ac_add_options --enable-official-branding
Build in progress.
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
That worked:
* http://staging-stage.build.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/3.6.2-candidates/build1/linux-x86_64/en-US/firefox-3.6.2.tar.bz2
* http://staging-stage.build.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/3.6.2-candidates/build1/linux-x86_64/en-US/firefox-3.6.2.tests.tar.bz2
* http://staging-stage.build.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/3.6.2-candidates/build1/linux-x86_64/en-US/firefox-3.6.2.txt
* http://staging-stage.build.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/3.6.2-candidates/build1/update/linux-x86_64/en-US/firefox-3.6.2.complete.mar
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #433411 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #437873 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #438561 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #438562 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 438562 [details] [diff] [review]
allow linux64 L10n repackages
I really don't understand why we have this check at all, to be honest.
Attachment #438562 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review+
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #438561 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review-
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 438561 [details] [diff] [review]
enable linux 64 for releases, l10n and some clean up (match staging and production)
This patch is fine, but as you're probably aware, there's more work to be done before updates will work. Please do not update the production config until we know exactly which release we know which release we're shipping it with.
r+ for everything except the mozilla2/ release config.
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
I won't have time for a while to deal with this putting into the pool.
For the record, we want to get this in with the alpha releases.
Assignee: armenzg → nobody
Priority: P2 → --
Updated•15 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P5
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [automation][linux64] → [automation][linux64][3.7alpha]
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
This is a mass change. Every comment has "assigned-to-new" in it.
I didn't look through the bugs, so I'm sorry if I change a bug which shouldn't be changed. But I guess these bugs are just bugs that were once assigned and people forgot to change the Status back when unassigning.
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → rail
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: P5 → P3
Comment 13•15 years ago
|
||
Rail let me know if you need any help with this.
I was always able to get all the way to signing but never got around to know what to do with updates.
There is no much more work than updating the patches (few releases have already happened) and get it through past the updates generation. Ben has more knowledge on that area than me.
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Comment 14•15 years ago
|
||
Any news about linux64 L10n repackages ? It would surely help me with testing l10n on my linux64 box.
Comment 15•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #14)
> Any news about linux64 L10n repackages ? It would surely help me with testing
> l10n on my linux64 box.
Hi Pavel,
Please use bug 571331 for tracking L10n nightly repackages.
We are able to do repackages for releases but for alpha releases we don't generate them.
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•15 years ago
|
||
All of the requested features of this bug have been fixed and tested in bug 559057. Closing.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•