Closed Bug 54904 Opened 24 years ago Closed 8 months ago

Install scripts cannot select chrome

Categories

(Core Graveyard :: Installer: XPInstall Engine, defect, P1)

All
Other

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
mozilla1.3alpha

People

(Reporter: dveditz, Unassigned)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: [xpiprd])

Attachments

(1 file)

Install must be able to select chrome. without it when you install locales or skins they do not update the user-<chrome>.rdf files in the bin/chrome directory. This leads to a couple of major problems: First, if you install an add-on component with a private skin then the component will not work -- period. The user will have to know how to edit the user-skins.rdf file manually. This is tempting certain developers to use the install to overwrite the existing user-skins.rdf file, which will certainly make their component work, but will break anything else registered there. Given more than one such component we would end up in an install-war. Second, on the initial Mozilla/Netscape 6 install without a way to select skin and locale during the install then the user-<chrome>.rdf files will be updated as components are used, which on a locked-down system (e.g. Unix or corporate WinNT) cannot be done after the first run, leading to failure.
Blocks: 41057
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Keywords: rtm
Whiteboard: [rtm+]
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.6
Ccing David.
You can force a selection using installed-chrome.txt. Is that not good enough? Also, the chrome registry will auto-select for you if nothing is selected, but it tries to do this only for the install dir (which is bad, since you may not have write access to the install dir).
I have a temp work around which works ok. After xpi installs the package, i have an install.xul file which is a simple dialog which calls "selectSkinForPackage" and does the right thing for the package. The only problem is the user has to do this: ./mozilla -chrome chrome://my_package/content/install.xul This is a lot to ask an end user to do . . . --pete
>You can force a selection using installed-chrome.txt. Is that not good enough? How . . . ?
How do we know what to put in installed-chrome.txt? Updating the summary to indicate this is a deficiency in the install command set, not that we're lacking any chrome registry functionality. We don't want add-on components to solve this problem by overwriting installed-chrome.txt themselves, that just leads to an install war.
Summary: Install cannot select chrome → Install scripts cannot select chrome
Yes, absolutely. We should give people the capability to install and select right off the bat. Make sure you give the capability to do the selection in the profile dir, since we won't want to be writing to the install dir.
Dan Dave. I have an idea that is a resonable solution i think. How about for now making package authors responsable for including and install.xul file. I have tested this method out all morning and it works great! If there was a way to make a call to call "window.openDialog" at the end of the install all of our problems will be solved. I can call this dialog after the install happens the user presses the finish button, the skin path is registered w/ selectSkinForPackage and the app then launches. Clean and easy. If you guys accept this method then we are already done. You can test out what i am talking about here: http://aphrodite.mozdev.org/installation.html or here: http://chameleon.mozdev.org/installation.html It is actually pretty cool. Dan, can we open a window from install.js w/out compromising "thread safety" ?? --pete
Pete, since this dialog would presumably be the same for all packages, it seems like we should automatically display the appropriate dialog for selection on our own.
Well the only reason i was suggesting that the authors do it themselves is because i have a real cool image of a chameleon as the background of my dialog. It just looks *SO COOL* man! ;-) --pete
There is a discussion, "UI language switching", about selecting the initial default locale in an intranet deployment environment. Please read news://news.mozilla.org/netscape.public.mozilla.i18n for details.
Attached image Cool Dialog!
Dan, one note on install wars. I have been wiping installed-chrome.txt away with the different packages i'm workin on and have not had any probs. I tried *not* using installed-chrome.txt but it doesn't work w/out it . . . It seems that this file is only needed once for initialization of the package. Is this correct? Thanks --pete
The installed-chrome.txt is only needed once, but it's not processed until next start up. By "install wars" I meant that if you happened to install more than one package in the same session that used this technique they would stomp on each other, and the one installed first would not get registered/selected correctly.
PDT marking [rtm-]. It's not clear why Seamonkey needs this before we ship. If skins work for our shipping components, we're done. Please renominate if we've misunderstood.
Whiteboard: [rtm+] → [rtm-]
Appealing PDT decision: they don't work, at least not well. With the select line put in installed-chrome.txt (which this fix would do) the right stuff gets written to user-skins.rdf at first start-up (and user-locales.rdf -- locales have the same problem). Without it nothing gets written until that component is used, which has been leaving mail and aim without a skin or locale if installed on a system that locks down the installed directory (as is common on unix, less common but not rare on windows NT). The workaround would be to leave the install directory world writable, or hand-hack an installed-chrome.txt
Whiteboard: [rtm-] → [rtm+]
I need this for Netscape's Theme Builder FWIW. This certianly is a problem and quite frankly is half/assed the way it is implemented right now. --pete
Dan, this seems to point out a profile related problem. We shouldn't have to hack stuff into the install directory to handle user level choices. It seems to me that we're storing this info in the wrong place and shouldn't have user-<anything>.rdf files anywhere in the install hierarchy. Can you explain that part of it for me?
Dan, i have stumbled upon an issue w/ installed-chrome.txt. On unix a carrage return is ^J and on windows it is ^M It seems that the ^J's are barfing on windows. How do i deal w/ this issue of platform control chars? If i edit them out on windows it works fine. Thanks --pete
Steve: The two user-<foo>.rdf files in the global chrome directory are misnamed IMO; a better choice would be default-skins.rdf and default-locales.rdf since these contain the selections used when the user hasn't otherwise made a selection recorded in the profile user-<foo>.rdf files. Whatever the name, if you install on a unix system or locked-down NT system the user-<foo>.rdf files generated on the first launch are incomplete. This leads to problems with SHIPPING CHROME, this is not some abstract nice to have. See bug 53674 for one instance, there are similar problems with Mail and AIM.
Blocks: 53674, 53680
Whiteboard: [rtm+] → [rtm+ need patch]
PDT marking [rtm need info]. Please change to [rtm+] when fix has been code reviewed.
Whiteboard: [rtm+ need patch] → [rtm need info]
I'm working for Japanese language pack. Many end users said why langpack doesn't switch default global locale to ja-JP in xpi installing. If I add "locale,install,select,ja-JP" into installed-chrome.txt manually, mozilla use ja-JP for default global locale. But I don't know how to add this line into installed-chrome.txt automatically. I'd like the option. Is there the method? I can add the following line into installed-chrome.txt by writing "registerChrome(LOCALE | DELAYED_CHROME, getFolder(cf, chromeName), "locale/ja-JP/global/");" in install.js. locale,install,url,jar:file://H|/mozilla/M18-10-6/bin/chrome/ja-JP.jar!/locale/ ja-JP/global/
That's exactly the problem this bug is aimed at solving.
Can't see that I'll get this by the PDT. Guess we'll have to ship a 6.01 upgrade so l10n can install new locales correctly.
Whiteboard: [rtm need info] → [rtm-]
Keywords: nsbeta1
Priority: P3 → P2
Target Milestone: mozilla0.6 → mozilla0.9
Whiteboard: [rtm-] → [xpiprd][rtm-]
Moz 0.8 tasks
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9 → mozilla0.8
Blocks: 66909
Priority: P2 → P1
Target Milestone: mozilla0.8 → mozilla0.9
Keywords: nsbeta1, rtmnsbeta1-
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9 → ---
No, we really do need to do this one because of theme upgrade problems, to make sure the user gets back to a safe state. Plussing.
Keywords: nsbeta1-nsbeta1+
Whiteboard: [xpiprd][rtm-] → [xpiprd]
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9
Blocks: 62177
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9 → mozilla0.9.1
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9.1 → mozilla0.9.3
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9.3 → mozilla0.9.4
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9.4 → mozilla0.9.5
Nominating.
Assignee: dveditz → syd
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Keywords: nsbeta1+nsbeta1
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9.5 → ---
Blocks: 104166
Keywords: nsbeta1
The raw chrome registry files have recently been collapsed into a single chrome.rdf file for performance reasons which eliminates the workaround hack localizers have been employing of overwriting one of the files to select the default language. The same issues come up for default skins -- this is now something we can't keep putting off.
Keywords: mozilla0.9.8
Btw. You can still use chrome.rdf to setup default skin / language during installation.
Overwriting an existing chrome.rdf is evil -- you have no idea what packages, skins or locales might be registered in there. It's an OK workaround for an initial fresh installation from scratch -- is my redundancy making the point? :-) -- but absolutely the wrong thing to do for an XPInstall to be doing.
It's working on fresh install and installed browser. Chrome.rdf is not overwritten when installing packages with chrome.rdf in properly installed browser (XPInstall method).
Keywords: nsbeta1+
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9.8
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Keywords: nsbeta1
Taking these two
Assignee: syd → dveditz
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Target Milestone: mozilla0.9.8 → mozilla1.0
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Blocks: 116669
nsbeta1- per ADT/XPInstall triage.
Keywords: nsbeta1+nsbeta1-, relnote
Please update this bug with an [adt1] - [adt3] impact rating (or take it off the list if it doesn't even rate adt3.) Thanks!
Hi, Dan: do you plan to work on this? If not, do you mind if we take it over? thx!
Feel free, I'd like to review though. I was imagining a syntax like int status selectChrome( type, chromeName [, package] ) Where type is all the values registerChrome() supports except CONTENT (i.e., support PROFILE_CHROME and DELAYED_CHROME in addition to SKIN and LOCALE). chromeName is self-explanatory, and the optional package is to allow authors to select chrome for only those packages for which the chrome is provided. You could support a list, or just make people enter multiple lines if you like, probably a rare use. Not sure it's supportable in installed-chrome.txt (delayed_chrome style).
Hi, Juraj: Please work with dveditz on this. thx!
Assignee: dveditz → jbetak
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
accepting
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Keywords: nsbeta1-nsbeta1+
Priority: P1 → P2
Target Milestone: mozilla1.0 → mozilla1.2alpha
Dan, just trying to establish what needs to be done. While surveying the source and useful APIs I stumbled upon this: http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/xpinstall/src/nsJSInstall.cpp#1839 http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/rdf/chrome/src/nsChromeRegistry.cpp#1732 It seems like I need to flesh out the InstallSelectChrome function in nsJSInstall.cpp. On the chrome backend, I'm tempted to follow what's being done for SelectSkin and SelectLocale - namely using SetProvider. I hope to be able to get this done by Sept. 4 - I'm also helping out Syd and Curt on MRE...
Arg, have to continue the "tradition" of pushing this out. Raising priority, I'd really like to get this done soon.
Priority: P2 → P1
Target Milestone: mozilla1.2alpha → mozilla1.3alpha
--> tao for reconsideration
Assignee: jbetak → tao
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Keywords: nsbeta1+nsbeta1
Installer triage team: nsbeta1-
Keywords: nsbeta1nsbeta1-
Hi, Bob: please reassign these i18n/l10n/l12y bugs accordingly. thx!
Assignee: tao → bobj
Assignee: bobj → nobody
QA Contact: jimmykenlee → xpi-engine
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 months ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: