Closed
Bug 557165
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
[SeaMonkey 2.1] mochitest-plain-4: "leaked 360 bytes = 5 instances of jsdScript + 10 instances of nsStringBuffer"
Categories
(Other Applications Graveyard :: Venkman JS Debugger, defect)
Other Applications Graveyard
Venkman JS Debugger
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.9.3a5
People
(Reporter: sgautherie, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug, )
Details
(Keywords: memory-leak, Whiteboard: [fixed by the "new add-ons manager UI"])
Example:
{
http://tinderbox.mozilla.org/showlog.cgi?log=SeaMonkey/1270436938.1270438962.15113.gz&fulltext=1
OS X 10.5 comm-central-trunk debug test mochitests-4/5 on 2010/04/04 20:08:58
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | automationutils.processLeakLog() | leaked 360 bytes during test execution
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | automationutils.processLeakLog() | leaked 5 instances of jsdScript with size 56 bytes each (280 bytes total)
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | automationutils.processLeakLog() | leaked 10 instances of nsStringBuffer with size 8 bytes each (80 bytes total)
}
***
KaiRo, ftb, we should use a bbc config.py leak_threshold for this case.
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #0)
> KaiRo, ftb, we should use a bbc config.py leak_threshold for this case.
I don't see how we should need one when Firefox doesn't. We first should try to find out where the leak comes from, as it's not a systemic leak in all mochitests, it is probably confined to a certain test.
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
And, BTW, I see no evidence that this is a venkman thing, all those leaked objects are core code (jsd is part of the core and has a component there, IIRC).
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> I don't see how we should need one when Firefox doesn't.
Ftb, I'm _guessing_ Firefox doesn't because it is not running Venkman.
> We first should try to find out where the leak comes from,
> as it's not a systemic leak in all mochitests,
> it is probably confined to a certain test.
But who do you think "we" is in practice?
I seem to be the (only) one most interested in test failures/leaks but I can't run debug mochitests atm.
(In reply to comment #2)
> And, BTW, I see no evidence that this is a venkman thing,
I concur, but I was looking for evidence that it's not related to Venkman first.
*****
Anyway, this leak went away with the "new add-ons manager UI" landing:
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=b826d7ba5c45&tochange=45a1894f2f9a
though I don't know what exactly fixed it.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Whiteboard: [fixed by the "new add-ons manager UI"]
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9.3a5
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
V.WorksForMe per 3-platform SeaMonkey tinderboxes.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
Leaks again after bug 562679 backout.
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
Fixed with bug 562679.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago → 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•7 years ago
|
Product: Other Applications → Other Applications Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•