Closed
Bug 55940
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
large view-image blanked out with low memory
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.0
People
(Reporter: orion, Assigned: pavlov)
References
()
Details
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001007 BuildID: 2000100720 the picture is displayed while loading but as soon as the picture has finished being transferred it shows nothing Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: just let the browser load the picture and wait for it to finish Actual Results: nothing Expected Results: just displayed the picture
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
Might be something to do with the large size of the image (2400 x 3000).
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
win98 2000100720, worksforme. Are you still seeing this?
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
2000100908 win98 WFM
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
win98 2000100908 worksforme as well
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
worksforme with win32 mozilla trunk build 101004
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
I'm still seeing this in Build 2000101020 in WinNT SP5 with 64MB RAM at 1024x768x24.
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
2000101104 stills worksforme
Comment 8•24 years ago
|
||
I'm still seeing this on WinNT. What can I run to analyse what is happening? I don't have any MS C++ Development tools on my machine.
Comment 9•24 years ago
|
||
over to imagelib for further investigation.
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Component: Browser-General → ImageLib
Resolution: WORKSFORME → ---
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
reassign to default owner.
Assignee: asa → pnunn
QA Contact: doronr → tpreston
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
wfm on win2k trunk build 2000110120. But while loading my Mozilla is very very slow. My Athlon 600 seem to be a C64 :-)
Comment 12•24 years ago
|
||
I still see this problem with Build 2000110220 in WinNT.
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
perhaps a problem with low memory ? The reporter have "only" 64MB RAM and NT. I can´t see this with WIN2K but I have 196MB. Reporter: Can you Do you delete your cache files (Profile/Cache) and the mozregistry.dat ?
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
I should point out that I'm not the reporter but I can see the Bug. At weekends I use a Linux box with 32MB ram, and I don't see the problem here, although the image does take 35-40 minutes to load! On Monday I'll delete the cache and mozregistry.dat when I use WinNT next and try loading the image.
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
I deleted mozregistry.dat and the Cache directory and started Mozilla build 2000110520 in WinNT. I went to this page and clicked on the url. The picture loaded and blanked out as soon as it had completed loading. I can still see this Bug.
Comment 17•24 years ago
|
||
Works For Me in Build 2000111220 in WinNT, although the image appears to be downloaded fully before any of it is displayed, rather than been incrementally displayed as the file is downloaded.
Comment 18•24 years ago
|
||
Picture blanks out in Build 2000111404 in WinNT. The picture is displayed as the image is loaded, but blanks out when the image is fully downloaded.
Comment 19•24 years ago
|
||
looks fine to me on my NT build from 11-10. Let me update my tree and see if I can duplicate the Mystery of the Disappearing Image. -p
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 20•24 years ago
|
||
I can see the disappearing image problem on a win95 machine with 48M ram. -p
Summary: picture blanks out → large view-image blanked out with low memory
Comment 21•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 62534 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 22•24 years ago
|
||
Isn't this another dup of bug 9922?
Comment 23•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 62602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24•24 years ago
|
||
Win98SE Mozilla 0.6 Problem seen here from time to time, not 100% reproducible. Only seen here on a dialup connection, never seen on fast connection, ie., T1, Cable, DSL. Size of image(s) does not seem to matter, happens with large or small images as well.
Comment 25•24 years ago
|
||
Image problem exists for me. Win98/PIII-600(256MB) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001108 Netscape6/6.0 Always reproducible. A large percentage of our image files are acting exactly as described. The file will download as part of a simple HTML document and, upon completion, remain viewable for about 1/2 second, then disappear. The image can be saved and re- loaded directly from disk with the same effect (not HTML related or download- bandwidth related). No problems in IE5 or Netscape 4.75. The page layout remains as if the image was there. In fact, you can right-click the (blank) image and save it, etc. Typical files are around 250KB and 2100 x 2100 px.
Comment 26•24 years ago
|
||
After further investigation, 1. The image rendering problem exists whether or not Java/Javascript is enabled (see, I read the ImageLib bug FAQ!) 2. I take back what I said about it not being an HTML problem. If I explicitly set the IMG tag to have WIDTH <= 2044 and HEIGHT <= 2043, the image renders fine - always reproducible. Budging either of these values up 1 results in the lost image (even if you lower the other number by any amount) - always reproducible. This works successfully for all of our image library (so far). Deliberately NOT setting the WIDTH and HEIGHT values also results in the disappearing image (as in our original code). That's probably why saving an image to disk still doesn't render properly - it appears that ImageLib just can't handle images of greater size (can anyone refute this?). At least our customers can see our images now, but this workaround incorporates image scaling, which wouldn't be cool for someone pushing out a 4k x 4k. Again, this is a PIII-600 with 256MB RAM and an ATI 3D Rage Pro displaying 32- bit color at 1024 x 768.
Comment 27•24 years ago
|
||
mark: super info. this bug may be related to 61597, though the symptoms are different enought to keep the bug "unduped" for now. much thanks for the info. -p
Comment 28•24 years ago
|
||
One more thing that may be of some help. Setting the IMG tag WIDTH and/or HEIGHT values to <I>percentages</I> still does not work, and the image disappears anyway (even if the percentage brings the dimensions well within the apparent maximums I discussed earlier). If you dynamically generate web pages with CGI and don't want smaller images enlarged to hard coded dimensions, Perl's user_agent and Image::Size module can help you work around this issue.
Comment 29•23 years ago
|
||
All pnunn bugs reassigned to Pav, who is taking over the imglib.
Assignee: pnunn → pavlov
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Comment 30•23 years ago
|
||
I believe this was fixed with the new imagelib, tested on network and over modem w98 build 2001042504 closing fixed, reporter please reopen if you are still experiencing this
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago → 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•